La IA no pot tenir autoria acadèmica o legal. La IA és una eina, no un subjecte amb intencionalitat ni responsabilitat. L’autoria correspon a la persona que utilitza la IA i decideix què n’incorpora. A la citació, s’indica l’eina com a font, no com a autor.
UAB Libraries' AI authorship and attribution guidance says AI cannot have academic or legal authorship; the person using AI remains intellectually responsible and the AI tool should be indicated as a source, not as an author.
Aquest document n’és un primer resultat provisional. Un cop constituït el grup de treball amb professorat de diferents centres, s’ha elaborat aquest document, que serà un document viu, perquè la tecnologia a la qual es refereix evoluciona gairebé a temps real i convindrà anar-lo actualitzant regularment.
UAB Libraries publishes a UAB positioning page on AI use in teaching that describes the document as a provisional, living document intended to support reflection on AI in university teaching rather than an exhaustive regulation.
La irrupció de ChatGPT i altres eines similars obliga a replantejar allò que es demana que provi o evidenciï cada estudiant. En general, tot allò que la màquina pot fer bé i de pressa no hauria de formar part de la proposta avaluativa, perquè s’estaria avaluant, en realitat, una producció artificial.
In its AI-in-teaching positioning guidance, UAB argues that ChatGPT and similar tools require rethinking assessment evidence and that tasks a machine can do quickly and well should not form part of an assessment proposal because they would evaluate artificial production.
claim-uab-002
Section: Impacte de la IA en la docencia i l'avaluacio
La IA no pot tenir autoria acadèmica o legal. La IA és una eina, no un subjecte amb intencionalitat ni responsabilitat. L’autoria correspon a la persona que utilitza la IA i decideix què n’incorpora. A la citació, s’indica l’eina com a font, no com a autor.
UAB Libraries' AI authorship and attribution guidance says AI cannot have academic or legal authorship; the person using AI remains intellectually responsible and the AI tool should be indicated as a source, not as an author.
Aquest document n’és un primer resultat provisional. Un cop constituït el grup de treball amb professorat de diferents centres, s’ha elaborat aquest document, que serà un document viu, perquè la tecnologia a la qual es refereix evoluciona gairebé a temps real i convindrà anar-lo actualitzant regularment.
UAB Libraries publishes a UAB positioning page on AI use in teaching that describes the document as a provisional, living document intended to support reflection on AI in university teaching rather than an exhaustive regulation.
La irrupció de ChatGPT i altres eines similars obliga a replantejar allò que es demana que provi o evidenciï cada estudiant. En general, tot allò que la màquina pot fer bé i de pressa no hauria de formar part de la proposta avaluativa, perquè s’estaria avaluant, en realitat, una producció artificial.
In its AI-in-teaching positioning guidance, UAB argues that ChatGPT and similar tools require rethinking assessment evidence and that tasks a machine can do quickly and well should not form part of an assessment proposal because they would evaluate artificial production.
claim-uab-002
Section: Impacte de la IA en la docencia i l'avaluacio
The IA cannot be listed as author or co-author of an article. AI should not be used to generate hypotheses, interpret data or formulate conclusions without the supervision and validation of the authors. Failure to disclose the use of AI in the article is considered academic misconduct and may result in rejection of the proposal or retraction of the published article.
The UAB Publications Service AI policy for articles says AI cannot be listed as an author or co-author, AI-generated scientific content requires author supervision and validation, and any AI use must be explicitly disclosed in the article.
La IA no pot tenir autoria acadèmica o legal. La IA és una eina, no un subjecte amb intencionalitat ni responsabilitat. L’autoria correspon a la persona que utilitza la IA i decideix què n’incorpora. A la citació, s’indica l’eina com a font, no com a autor.
UAB Libraries' AI authorship and attribution guidance says AI cannot have academic or legal authorship; the person using AI remains intellectually responsible and the AI tool should be indicated as a source, not as an author.
Aquest document n’és un primer resultat provisional. Un cop constituït el grup de treball amb professorat de diferents centres, s’ha elaborat aquest document, que serà un document viu, perquè la tecnologia a la qual es refereix evoluciona gairebé a temps real i convindrà anar-lo actualitzant regularment.
UAB Libraries publishes a UAB positioning page on AI use in teaching that describes the document as a provisional, living document intended to support reflection on AI in university teaching rather than an exhaustive regulation.
Privacitat i seguretat de les dades. La IA es basa principalment en dades obertes d’internet, però també en informació derivada de l’ús de les pròpies eines. Cal: revisar els termes d’ús dels serveis; evitar la filtració d’informació institucional; garantir el compliment del RGPD i altres normatives.
UAB Libraries' responsible-use guidance for AI says privacy and data security require reviewing service terms, avoiding leakage of institutional information, and ensuring compliance with GDPR and other regulations.
Privacitat i seguretat de les dades. La IA es basa principalment en dades obertes d’internet, però també en informació derivada de l’ús de les pròpies eines. Cal: revisar els termes d’ús dels serveis; evitar la filtració d’informació institucional; garantir el compliment del RGPD i altres normatives.
UAB Libraries' responsible-use guidance for AI says privacy and data security require reviewing service terms, avoiding leakage of institutional information, and ensuring compliance with GDPR and other regulations.
The IA cannot be listed as author or co-author of an article. AI should not be used to generate hypotheses, interpret data or formulate conclusions without the supervision and validation of the authors. Failure to disclose the use of AI in the article is considered academic misconduct and may result in rejection of the proposal or retraction of the published article.
The UAB Publications Service AI policy for articles says AI cannot be listed as an author or co-author, AI-generated scientific content requires author supervision and validation, and any AI use must be explicitly disclosed in the article.
La IA no pot tenir autoria acadèmica o legal. La IA és una eina, no un subjecte amb intencionalitat ni responsabilitat. L’autoria correspon a la persona que utilitza la IA i decideix què n’incorpora. A la citació, s’indica l’eina com a font, no com a autor.
UAB Libraries' AI authorship and attribution guidance says AI cannot have academic or legal authorship; the person using AI remains intellectually responsible and the AI tool should be indicated as a source, not as an author.
Aquest document n’és un primer resultat provisional. Un cop constituït el grup de treball amb professorat de diferents centres, s’ha elaborat aquest document, que serà un document viu, perquè la tecnologia a la qual es refereix evoluciona gairebé a temps real i convindrà anar-lo actualitzant regularment.
UAB Libraries publishes a UAB positioning page on AI use in teaching that describes the document as a provisional, living document intended to support reflection on AI in university teaching rather than an exhaustive regulation.
The IA cannot be listed as author or co-author of an article. AI should not be used to generate hypotheses, interpret data or formulate conclusions without the supervision and validation of the authors. Failure to disclose the use of AI in the article is considered academic misconduct and may result in rejection of the proposal or retraction of the published article.
The UAB Publications Service AI policy for articles says AI cannot be listed as an author or co-author, AI-generated scientific content requires author supervision and validation, and any AI use must be explicitly disclosed in the article.
La IA no pot tenir autoria acadèmica o legal. La IA és una eina, no un subjecte amb intencionalitat ni responsabilitat. L’autoria correspon a la persona que utilitza la IA i decideix què n’incorpora. A la citació, s’indica l’eina com a font, no com a autor.
UAB Libraries' AI authorship and attribution guidance says AI cannot have academic or legal authorship; the person using AI remains intellectually responsible and the AI tool should be indicated as a source, not as an author.
Aquest document n’és un primer resultat provisional. Un cop constituït el grup de treball amb professorat de diferents centres, s’ha elaborat aquest document, que serà un document viu, perquè la tecnologia a la qual es refereix evoluciona gairebé a temps real i convindrà anar-lo actualitzant regularment.
UAB Libraries publishes a UAB positioning page on AI use in teaching that describes the document as a provisional, living document intended to support reflection on AI in university teaching rather than an exhaustive regulation.
La irrupció de ChatGPT i altres eines similars obliga a replantejar allò que es demana que provi o evidenciï cada estudiant. En general, tot allò que la màquina pot fer bé i de pressa no hauria de formar part de la proposta avaluativa, perquè s’estaria avaluant, en realitat, una producció artificial.
In its AI-in-teaching positioning guidance, UAB argues that ChatGPT and similar tools require rethinking assessment evidence and that tasks a machine can do quickly and well should not form part of an assessment proposal because they would evaluate artificial production.
claim-uab-002
Section: Impacte de la IA en la docencia i l'avaluacio
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
Security and procurementUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona
Not mentioned in reviewed sources
Status & scope
Scope stated in the cited claims
Original official evidence
No reviewed evidence is included for this topic. This does not establish that no rule exists.
Record updatesLast 90 days
Updates to this site's reviewed record, not confirmation that the university changed its policy.
Update records are not available for this page yet.
Reviewed record
Reviewed claims
5 reviewed claims
Academic Integrity 1 reviewed claim
Academic Integrity
UAB Libraries' AI authorship and attribution guidance says AI cannot have academic or legal authorship; the person using AI remains intellectually responsible and the AI tool should be indicated as a source, not as an author.
Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%
Normalized value: UAB AI guide treats AI as a tool/source, not an academic author
Last checked
May 15, 2026
Last changed
May 15, 2026
Original evidence
Evidence 1
La IA no pot tenir autoria acadèmica o legal. La IA és una eina, no un subjecte amb intencionalitat ni responsabilitat. L’autoria correspon a la persona que utilitza la IA i decideix què n’incorpora. A la citació, s’indica l’eina com a font, no com a autor.
Localized display only
UAB Libraries says AI is a tool rather than an author, and that the person using AI remains responsible for what is incorporated.
Source language
ca
Snapshot hash
fdd1ca36…
Retrieved
May 15, 2026
Evidence locator
Section: Autoria i atribucio de la IA
Teaching 2 reviewed claims
Teaching
UAB Libraries publishes a UAB positioning page on AI use in teaching that describes the document as a provisional, living document intended to support reflection on AI in university teaching rather than an exhaustive regulation.
Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%
Normalized value: UAB has official AI-in-teaching positioning guidance, framed as provisional and reflective
Last checked
May 15, 2026
Last changed
May 15, 2026
Original evidence
Evidence 1
Aquest document n’és un primer resultat provisional. Un cop constituït el grup de treball amb professorat de diferents centres, s’ha elaborat aquest document, que serà un document viu, perquè la tecnologia a la qual es refereix evoluciona gairebé a temps real i convindrà anar-lo actualitzant regularment.
Localized display only
The UAB positioning document is framed as a provisional, living document that will need regular updates.
Source language
ca
Snapshot hash
a8a5baaf…
Retrieved
May 15, 2026
Evidence locator
Section: Presentacio
Teaching
In its AI-in-teaching positioning guidance, UAB argues that ChatGPT and similar tools require rethinking assessment evidence and that tasks a machine can do quickly and well should not form part of an assessment proposal because they would evaluate artificial production.
Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%
Normalized value: UAB teaching guidance recommends rethinking assessments around AI-generated output
Last checked
May 15, 2026
Last changed
May 15, 2026
Original evidence
Evidence 1
La irrupció de ChatGPT i altres eines similars obliga a replantejar allò que es demana que provi o evidenciï cada estudiant. En general, tot allò que la màquina pot fer bé i de pressa no hauria de formar part de la proposta avaluativa, perquè s’estaria avaluant, en realitat, una producció artificial.
Localized display only
UAB's teaching guidance says ChatGPT-like tools require rethinking what assessments ask students to evidence.
Source language
ca
Snapshot hash
a8a5baaf…
Retrieved
May 15, 2026
Evidence locator
Section: Impacte de la IA en la docencia i l'avaluacio
Privacy 1 reviewed claim
Privacy
UAB Libraries' responsible-use guidance for AI says privacy and data security require reviewing service terms, avoiding leakage of institutional information, and ensuring compliance with GDPR and other regulations.
Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%
Normalized value: UAB AI guide includes privacy, institutional data leakage, and GDPR cautions
Last checked
May 15, 2026
Last changed
May 15, 2026
Original evidence
Evidence 1
Privacitat i seguretat de les dades. La IA es basa principalment en dades obertes d’internet, però també en informació derivada de l’ús de les pròpies eines. Cal: revisar els termes d’ús dels serveis; evitar la filtració d’informació institucional; garantir el compliment del RGPD i altres normatives.
Localized display only
The UAB guide says AI privacy/data security requires checking service terms, avoiding institutional-information leaks, and complying with GDPR.
Source language
ca
Snapshot hash
bfc2aa9f…
Retrieved
May 15, 2026
Evidence locator
Section: Privacitat i seguretat de les dades
Research 1 reviewed claim
Research
The UAB Publications Service AI policy for articles says AI cannot be listed as an author or co-author, AI-generated scientific content requires author supervision and validation, and any AI use must be explicitly disclosed in the article.
Review: Agent reviewedConfidence96%
Normalized value: UAB Publications Service AI policy restricts AI authorship and requires disclosure in articles
Last checked
May 15, 2026
Last changed
May 15, 2026
Original evidence
Evidence 1
The IA cannot be listed as author or co-author of an article. AI should not be used to generate hypotheses, interpret data or formulate conclusions without the supervision and validation of the authors. Failure to disclose the use of AI in the article is considered academic misconduct and may result in rejection of the proposal or retraction of the published article.
Localized display only
The UAB Publications Service policy restricts AI authorship, requires author supervision/validation, and treats nondisclosure as academic misconduct for articles.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
5fde6088…
Retrieved
May 15, 2026
Evidence locator
Sections: Unaccepted uses; Disclosure
Source record
Official sources
4 sources
4 official URLs; 4 source attributions and their captured versions retained.
Aspectes etics i deontologics - Intel.ligencia Artificial - Biblioteques UAB
bibguies.uab.cat
University official source
bibguies.uab.cat
Hash and captured version
Aspectes etics i deontologics - Intel.ligencia Artificial - Biblioteques UAB · 2026-05-15T04:05:19Z
Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.
Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked May 15, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/universitat-autonoma-de-barcelona
Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.
Saved from University AI Policy Tracker. This record summarizes the cited sources; it is not an official university statement or assessment permission. Source and review dates are listed above. Hashes identify retained content, not authorization.
Questions students ask
Questions students ask
Can I use AI for my coursework?
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona has 3 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
