Change log

The University of Hong Kong

Source-check timeline, source snapshot hashes, claim review state, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed claim evidence.

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

The University of Hong Kong currently has 6 source-backed claim records and 3 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 5, 2026.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Claim/evidence diff preview

Diff-style preview built from current public claim/evidence records. Full old/new source diffs require paired historical snapshots.

The University of Hong Kong current policy evidence

Inserted lines represent current public claim and evidence records in the source-backed dataset.

+12-0
11 # The University of Hong Kong AI policy record
2+source_status: HKU's Guidelines on the Responsible Use of Generative AI in Research were formally approved by the Senate on September 23, 2025 and are now in effect.
3+Evidence (en, 56fea967d30f): I am pleased to announce that the Guidelines on the Responsible Use of Generative AI in Research at The University of Hong Kong have been formally approved by the Senate and are now in effect.
4+research: HKU states that researchers should clearly disclose generative AI tool usage in research outputs, publications, and presentations, including the type of GenAI used, data sources, and potential limitations.
5+Evidence (en, a2a40ef2dbad): Transparency and Disclosure: Clearly disclose GenAI tool usage in research outputs, publications, or presentations, for example the type of GenAI used, data sources, and potential limitations. Maintain detailed documentation of GenAI prompts, outputs, and decision-making processes involving GenAI.
6+privacy: HKU states that input data used with generative AI should comply with data protection laws and university policies, and that users should avoid sharing sensitive, confidential, or proprietary information with GenAI platforms.
7+Evidence (en, a2a40ef2dbad): Data Privacy and Confidentiality: Ensure input data used with GenAI complies with data protection laws and University policies. Avoid sharing sensitive, confidential, or proprietary information with GenAI platforms.
8+research: HKU holds researchers responsible for the outputs generated by generative AI and their implications; GenAI should be used as a support tool, not a substitute for critical analysis and human expertise.
9+Evidence (en, a2a40ef2dbad): Accountability: Researchers are responsible for the outputs generated by GenAI and their implications. ... Limit Over-Reliance: Use GenAI as a support tool, not a substitute for critical analysis and human expertise.
10+research: HKU states that researchers should ensure generative AI use does not infringe existing intellectual property rights or compromise research output ownership.
11+Evidence (en, a2a40ef2dbad): Respect Intellectual Property and Ownership: Ensure that the use of GenAI does not infringe on existing rights or compromise research outputs ownership.
12+source_status: HKU's GenAI research guidelines are positioned as an institutional policy under the Research Integrity framework, approved by Senate in September 2025.
13+Evidence (en, c72f52741aae): HKU is committed to fostering responsible GenAI practices and promoting best practices in the adoption of GenAI among researchers, students, supervisors and other staff in the research community. The Guidelines on the Responsible Use of Generative AI in Research at The University of Hong Kong was approved by the Senate on September 23, 2025.

Claim changes

6 claim records

source_status

HKU's Guidelines on the Responsible Use of Generative AI in Research were formally approved by the Senate on September 23, 2025 and are now in effect.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence97%Evidence1Languagesen

research

HKU states that researchers should clearly disclose generative AI tool usage in research outputs, publications, and presentations, including the type of GenAI used, data sources, and potential limitations.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence1Languagesen

privacy

HKU states that input data used with generative AI should comply with data protection laws and university policies, and that users should avoid sharing sensitive, confidential, or proprietary information with GenAI platforms.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesen

research

HKU holds researchers responsible for the outputs generated by generative AI and their implications; GenAI should be used as a support tool, not a substitute for critical analysis and human expertise.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%Evidence1Languagesen

research

HKU states that researchers should ensure generative AI use does not infringe existing intellectual property rights or compromise research output ownership.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%Evidence1Languagesen

source_status

HKU's GenAI research guidelines are positioned as an institutional policy under the Research Integrity framework, approved by Senate in September 2025.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence85%Evidence1Languagesen

Source snapshots

3 source attributions

Research Services - Research Integrity

official_guidance checked May 5, 2026

Snapshot hash
c72f52741aae7ac105ebb79e05dd4148279c964e7c205aeb8308e4d374e88bab