University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
Language
ENZHFRPL

Change log

University of Amsterdam

Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.

Review: Agent reviewedLast checkedMay 11, 2026Last changedMay 11, 2026Claims4Sources5Release records0
University pagePublic JSONMonthly reportUniversity index

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

University of Amsterdam currently has 4 source-backed claim records and 5 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 11, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

This page combines all public release diffs for University of Amsterdam. Individual release snapshots remain available from their release-specific URLs.

No release-to-release policy diff rows are recorded for this university yet. The page still tracks current source-backed claims, official source attributions, review state, source freshness, and public JSON for discovery and citation.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.

Diff categories

Semantic classification for this release diff.

Policy text0Newly extracted0Evidence0Source snapshots0Source text0Source added0Source removed0

Combined release diff

Unified tracker diff generated from all public release snapshots for this university.

University of Amsterdam combined release diff

Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.

+8-0
11 # University of Amsterdam AI policy record
2+teaching: The University of Amsterdam has a policy framework for Generative AI in education that provides central guidelines for responsible use of GenAI based on scientific integrity, with room for faculties and programmes to translate the policy into their own educational practice.
3+Evidence (en, 859ff4ab2276): The policy framework contains general and specific guidelines for the responsible use of GenAI in education. At the same time, it offers faculties and programmes room to translate the policy into their own educational practice. After all, GenAI requires customization: the impact and proper application differs per discipline.
4+academic_integrity: At the UvA, both the Netherlands Code of Conduct for Research Integrity and the European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity apply, which outline the principles and standards for integrity in research and teaching.
5+Evidence (en, 38493fe8850e): At the UvA, both the Netherlands Code of Conduct for Research Integrity and the European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity apply. These outline the principles and standards for integrity in research and teaching.
6+ai_tool_treatment: The University of Amsterdam is developing its own AI chat environment called UvA AI Chat, which is similar to ChatGPT but is fully self-managed and specifically designed for UvA students, lecturers and staff.
7+Evidence (en, 5510c80cc0df): The UvA is developing its own AI chat environment: the UvA AI Chat. This application is similar to ChatGPT but is fully self-managed and specifically designed for UvA students, lecturers and staff.
8+ai_tool_treatment: The UvA and VU task force on AI in education has produced criteria for software to ensure academic integrity, and expects students to be transparent about how they have applied generative AI in their own learning and work.
9+Evidence (en, 5969f7a14500): The UvA and VU draw up clear rules and guidelines on how students may use AI during teaching and assessment. We expect students to be transparent about how they have applied generative AI in their own learning and work.

Release history

0 public release diffs

Claim changes

4 claim records

academic_integrity

At the UvA, both the Netherlands Code of Conduct for Research Integrity and the European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity apply, which outline the principles and standards for integrity in research and teaching.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence1Languagesen

ai_tool_treatment

The UvA and VU task force on AI in education has produced criteria for software to ensure academic integrity, and expects students to be transparent about how they have applied generative AI in their own learning and work.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%Evidence1Languagesen

ai_tool_treatment

The University of Amsterdam is developing its own AI chat environment called UvA AI Chat, which is similar to ChatGPT but is fully self-managed and specifically designed for UvA students, lecturers and staff.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesen

teaching

The University of Amsterdam has a policy framework for Generative AI in education that provides central guidelines for responsible use of GenAI based on scientific integrity, with room for faculties and programmes to translate the policy into their own educational practice.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence96%Evidence1Languagesen

Source snapshots

5 source attributions