Amsterdam, Netherlands

University of Amsterdam

Record status

Policy statusReviewed evidence-backed recordReview: Agent reviewedClaim coverage4 reviewedEvidence-backed claims4Reviewed4Candidate0Official sources5Source languageenPublic JSON/api/public/v1/universities/university-of-amsterdam.json

Policy profile

Coverage score70/100Coverage labelmoderate public coverageReview: Machine candidateAnalysis confidence80%

AI disclosure

No source-backed public claim about AI disclosure or acknowledgement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about disclosing, acknowledging, citing, or declaring AI use.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Privacy and data entry

No source-backed public claim about privacy or data-entry restrictions is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about personal, confidential, sensitive, regulated, or student data entry into AI tools.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Academic integrity

University of Amsterdam has 2 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: recommended.

RecommendedMachine candidateConfidence80%Evidence2Sources2

Approved tools

University of Amsterdam has 2 source-backed public claims for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: allowed.

AllowedMachine candidateConfidence80%Evidence2Sources2

Named AI services

University of Amsterdam has 2 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: unclear.

UnclearMachine candidateConfidence80%Evidence2Sources2

Teaching guidance

University of Amsterdam has 2 source-backed public claims for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.

RecommendedMachine candidateConfidence81%Evidence2Sources2

Research guidance

University of Amsterdam has 1 source-backed public claim for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.

RecommendedMachine candidateConfidence81%Evidence1Sources1

Security and procurement

No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

AI tools

Derived tool records2

ChatGPT

University of Amsterdam

Tool
ChatGPT
About
Not specified
Access
Not specified
Cost
Not specified
Availability
Unknown
Review
Agent reviewed

Institutional AI service

University of Amsterdam

Tool
Institutional AI service
About
Not specified
Access
Not specified
Cost
Not specified
Availability
Unknown
Review
Agent reviewed
Sources

Evidence-backed claims

4 reviewed evidence-backed public claim

Teaching

The University of Amsterdam has a policy framework for Generative AI in education that provides central guidelines for responsible use of GenAI based on scientific integrity, with room for faculties and programmes to translate the policy into their own educational practice.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence96%

Normalized value: UvA has official GenAI policy framework for education with faculty-level customization

Original evidence

Evidence 1
The policy framework contains general and specific guidelines for the responsible use of GenAI in education. At the same time, it offers faculties and programmes room to translate the policy into their own educational practice. After all, GenAI requires customization: the impact and proper application differs per discipline.

Academic Integrity

At the UvA, both the Netherlands Code of Conduct for Research Integrity and the European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity apply, which outline the principles and standards for integrity in research and teaching.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%

Normalized value: UvA adheres to Netherlands and European Codes of Conduct for Research Integrity

Original evidence

Evidence 1
At the UvA, both the Netherlands Code of Conduct for Research Integrity and the European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity apply. These outline the principles and standards for integrity in research and teaching.

Ai Tool Treatment

The University of Amsterdam is developing its own AI chat environment called UvA AI Chat, which is similar to ChatGPT but is fully self-managed and specifically designed for UvA students, lecturers and staff.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%

Normalized value: UvA AI Chat is official self-managed AI tool for UvA community

Original evidence

Evidence 1
The UvA is developing its own AI chat environment: the UvA AI Chat. This application is similar to ChatGPT but is fully self-managed and specifically designed for UvA students, lecturers and staff.

Ai Tool Treatment

The UvA and VU task force on AI in education has produced criteria for software to ensure academic integrity, and expects students to be transparent about how they have applied generative AI in their own learning and work.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%

Normalized value: UvA requires student transparency on GenAI use and has software criteria for academic integrity

Original evidence

Evidence 1
The UvA and VU draw up clear rules and guidelines on how students may use AI during teaching and assessment. We expect students to be transparent about how they have applied generative AI in their own learning and work.

Candidate claims

0 machine or needs-review claim

Official sources

5 source attribution

Change log

Last checkedMay 11, 2026Last changedMay 11, 2026Open change log

Corrections

Back to universities