University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
Language
ENZHFRPL

Change log

Universiti Teknologi Brunei

Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.

Review: Agent reviewedLast checkedMay 17, 2026Last changedMay 17, 2026Claims5Sources1Release records0
University pagePublic JSONMonthly reportUniversity index

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

Universiti Teknologi Brunei currently has 5 source-backed claim records and 1 official source attribution. Latest tracked changed date: May 17, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

This page combines all public release diffs for Universiti Teknologi Brunei. Individual release snapshots remain available from their release-specific URLs.

No release-to-release policy diff rows are recorded for this university yet. The page still tracks current source-backed claims, official source attributions, review state, source freshness, and public JSON for discovery and citation.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.

Diff categories

Semantic classification for this release diff.

Policy text0Newly extracted0Evidence0Source snapshots0Source text0Source added0Source removed0

Combined release diff

Unified tracker diff generated from all public release snapshots for this university.

Universiti Teknologi Brunei combined release diff

Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.

+10-0
11 # Universiti Teknologi Brunei AI policy record
2+ai_tool_treatment: UTB's GenAI guidance encourages students and staff to use generative AI as a productivity tool, while stating that use must not come at the expense of academic integrity.
3+Evidence (en, 81fd6fd8d2a0): Universiti Teknologi Brunei encourages students and staff to embrace the usage of generative AI as a useful productivity tool. However, this must not be at the expense of academic integrity.
4+academic_integrity: Where a coursework item has no specified GenAI policy, UTB's guidance treats GenAI content generation as third-party assistance and says the assistance must be explained, declared, and referenced to avoid plagiarism.
5+Evidence (en, 81fd6fd8d2a0): Where no policy on GenAI usage for a coursework item has been specified by the lecturer, any use of GenAI for content generation is the equivalent of getting assistance from third parties ... the exact assistance obtained from GenAI must be explained, declared and referenced properly, to avoid the academic offence of plagiarism.
6+source_status: Universiti Teknologi Brunei has a Senate-approved GenAI guidance section for UTB students' usage in module assessments in its Student Report Manual.
7+Evidence (en, 81fd6fd8d2a0): Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) Guidance for UTB students: Usage in Module Assessments ... Approved by UTB Senate on 12 January 2025.
8+teaching: For UTB module assessments, the GenAI guidance says the lecturer will specify the permitted level of GenAI usage for each coursework item.
9+Evidence (en, 81fd6fd8d2a0): Your lecturer will specify for each coursework item the permitted level of GenAI usage according to the following example.
10+academic_integrity: The UTB coursework declaration in the Student Report Manual asks students to indicate whether they used GenAI and, for generated content, to include prompts and outputs as an appendix and cite the GenAI tool used.
11+Evidence (en, 81fd6fd8d2a0): I declare that (tick any that apply): ... I used genAI to generate contents, ideas, and/or structure ... I used genAI to generate contents which I have copied directly into my submission. * a copy of the prompts and outputs has been included as an appendix to my submission. The genAI tool used has also been cited.

Release history

0 public release diffs

Claim changes

5 claim records

academic_integrity

The UTB coursework declaration in the Student Report Manual asks students to indicate whether they used GenAI and, for generated content, to include prompts and outputs as an appendix and cite the GenAI tool used.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence91%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

Where a coursework item has no specified GenAI policy, UTB's guidance treats GenAI content generation as third-party assistance and says the assistance must be explained, declared, and referenced to avoid plagiarism.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesen

teaching

For UTB module assessments, the GenAI guidance says the lecturer will specify the permitted level of GenAI usage for each coursework item.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%Evidence1Languagesen

ai_tool_treatment

UTB's GenAI guidance encourages students and staff to use generative AI as a productivity tool, while stating that use must not come at the expense of academic integrity.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesen

source_status

Universiti Teknologi Brunei has a Senate-approved GenAI guidance section for UTB students' usage in module assessments in its Student Report Manual.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%Evidence1Languagesen

Source snapshots

1 source attribution