academic_integrity
For manuscripts submitted to the USFQ-hosted Iuris Dictio journal, generative AI use is permitted only as limited formal writing support and has to be explicitly declared.
Open, evidence-backed AI policy records for public reuse.
Change log
Source-check timeline, source snapshot hashes, claim review state, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed claim evidence.
Current public record freshness and review state.
Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ currently has 4 source-backed claim records and 3 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 20, 2026.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Diff-style preview built from current public claim/evidence records. Full old/new source diffs require paired historical snapshots.
Inserted lines represent current public claim and evidence records in the source-backed dataset.
4 claim records
For manuscripts submitted to the USFQ-hosted Iuris Dictio journal, generative AI use is permitted only as limited formal writing support and has to be explicitly declared.
For Iuris Dictio submissions, generative AI tools cannot replace the author’s academic judgment or perform substantive work such as hypothesis formulation, legal analysis, or argumentation.
USFQ’s “Inteligencia Artificial Generativa para Ciencias Sociales, Economía y Derecho” continuing-education program requires access to AI platform accounts, including premium OpenAI ChatGPT and Claude.ai subscriptions during the program.
USFQ’s March 2026 generative-AI content course includes a learning outcome on evaluating AI ethics challenges and applying good practices and ethical guidelines for responsible and transparent AI use.
3 source attributions
official_guidance checked May 20, 2026
official_guidance checked May 20, 2026
official_guidance checked May 20, 2026