University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
Language
ENZHFRPL

Change log

Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ

Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.

Review: Agent reviewedLast checkedMay 20, 2026Last changedMay 20, 2026Claims4Sources3Release records0
University pagePublic JSONMonthly reportUniversity index

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ currently has 4 source-backed claim records and 3 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 20, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

This page combines all public release diffs for Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ. Individual release snapshots remain available from their release-specific URLs.

No release-to-release policy diff rows are recorded for this university yet. The page still tracks current source-backed claims, official source attributions, review state, source freshness, and public JSON for discovery and citation.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.

Diff categories

Semantic classification for this release diff.

Policy text0Newly extracted0Evidence0Source snapshots0Source text0Source added0Source removed0

Combined release diff

Unified tracker diff generated from all public release snapshots for this university.

Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ combined release diff

Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.

+8-0
11 # Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ AI policy record
2+academic_integrity: For manuscripts submitted to the USFQ-hosted Iuris Dictio journal, generative AI use is permitted only as limited formal writing support and has to be explicitly declared.
3+Evidence (es, 4617e64dbc30): El uso de herramientas de inteligencia artificial generativa se permite exclusivamente como apoyo limitado en aspectos formales de redacción (por ejemplo, gramática o claridad lingüística) y deberá declararse explícitamente.
4+academic_integrity: For Iuris Dictio submissions, generative AI tools cannot replace the author’s academic judgment or perform substantive work such as hypothesis formulation, legal analysis, or argumentation.
5+Evidence (es, 4617e64dbc30): En ningún caso estas herramientas podrán sustituir el criterio académico del autor ni asumir tareas sustantivas como la formulación de hipótesis, el análisis jurídico o la elaboración argumentativa.
6+ai_tool_treatment: USFQ’s “Inteligencia Artificial Generativa para Ciencias Sociales, Economía y Derecho” continuing-education program requires access to AI platform accounts, including premium OpenAI ChatGPT and Claude.ai subscriptions during the program.
7+Evidence (es, e6b6d59056bc): Acceso a cuentas en plataformas de IA (se requiere suscripción premium a OpenAI ChatGPT y Claude.ai durante la duración del programa)
8+teaching: USFQ’s March 2026 generative-AI content course includes a learning outcome on evaluating AI ethics challenges and applying good practices and ethical guidelines for responsible and transparent AI use.
9+Evidence (es, 15abc2b0e054): Evaluar y abordar los desafíos éticos asociados con el uso de IA, aplicando buenas prácticas y directrices éticas para asegurar una implementación responsable y transparente.

Release history

0 public release diffs

Claim changes

4 claim records

academic_integrity

For manuscripts submitted to the USFQ-hosted Iuris Dictio journal, generative AI use is permitted only as limited formal writing support and has to be explicitly declared.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence88%Evidence1Languageses

academic_integrity

For Iuris Dictio submissions, generative AI tools cannot replace the author’s academic judgment or perform substantive work such as hypothesis formulation, legal analysis, or argumentation.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence88%Evidence1Languageses

ai_tool_treatment

USFQ’s “Inteligencia Artificial Generativa para Ciencias Sociales, Economía y Derecho” continuing-education program requires access to AI platform accounts, including premium OpenAI ChatGPT and Claude.ai subscriptions during the program.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence84%Evidence1Languageses

teaching

USFQ’s March 2026 generative-AI content course includes a learning outcome on evaluating AI ethics challenges and applying good practices and ethical guidelines for responsible and transparent AI use.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence78%Evidence1Languageses

Source snapshots

3 source attributions