Release diff

University of Plymouth

Unified tracker diff for public-release-20260523-001. Full source-page text is not published; short original-language evidence snippets are shown for citation context.

Unified diff

Release-to-release tracker changes generated from public release snapshots.

University of Plymouth public-release-20260523-001 diff

Initial tracked release.

+11-0
11 # University of Plymouth AI policy diff
22 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
33 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
4+academic_integrity: University of Plymouth Faculty of Science and Engineering guidance states that using ChatGPT or similar AI tools to generate assessed work for submission is considered plagiarism and a breach of the university's academic offences regulations.
5+Evidence (en, e19401d4c8a7): Utilizing ChatGPT or similar AI tools to generate the assessed work that you submit is considered plagiarism and a breach of our university's academic offences regulations. Such practices can result in disciplinary action, up to and including a requirement to withdraw from the university.
6+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-17T13:27:49.000Z
47 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
58 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
9+academic_integrity: University of Plymouth Faculty of Science and Engineering guidance says AI tools such as ChatGPT should generally not be used to generate the final version of assessed work, unless the coursework briefing clearly states an exception.
10+Evidence (en, e19401d4c8a7): In general, AI tools such as ChatGPT should not be used in generating the final version of your work for submission. Any exceptions to this will be clearly stated in the coursework briefing.
11+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-17T13:27:49.000Z
612 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
713 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
14+ai_tool_treatment: University of Plymouth Faculty of Science and Engineering guidance describes limited AI uses such as brainstorming, planning, structuring work, proofreading, checking typos, generating example code, and exploring how code works.
15+Evidence (en, e19401d4c8a7): AI tools can be valuable for helping set out the parameters of arguments and providing examples of how to structure different pieces of work; AI can also be used to generate example code and also explore how other people's code works; AI can be used for proof-reading and checking for typos.
16+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-17T13:27:49.000Z
817 ## Source attribution added
918 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
19+Source https://ecm-academics.plymouth.ac.uk/jsummerscales/MATS347/Publications/FoSE_AI_statement_V3.pdf snapshot e19401d4c8a73981c9224819c661a3171d22fbe38e213e45ed455d96be63309c
20+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-17T13:27:49.000Z

How to read this diff

Tracker release metadata, not direct proof of university publication timing.

Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes mean the same URL produced a different hash; that may be policy text, layout, navigation, or metadata.

Boundary

Tracker metadata only

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.