Change log

Pennsylvania State University

Source-check timeline, source snapshot hashes, claim review state, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed claim evidence.

Review: Agent reviewedLast checkedMay 13, 2026Last changedMay 13, 2026Claims8Sources6

University page Public JSON

Pennsylvania State University currently has 8 source-backed claim records and 6 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 13, 2026.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

11 # Pennsylvania State University AI policy record
2+security_review: Penn State's AI Studio user agreement permits Level 1 and Level 2 data in AI Studio and prohibits Level 3 and Level 4 data.
3+Evidence (en, 831d5e5df740): Level 1 (Low) and Level 2 (Moderate) data may be entered into AI Studio. Users must not enter Level 3 (High) or Level 4 (Restricted) data into AI Studio.
4+privacy: Penn State guidance tells users not to use free personal AI accounts for Penn State-related teaching, learning, research, or work and never to input Level 3 or Level 4 information into any AI tool.
5+Evidence (en, f216db46b75e): Do not use free personal AI accounts for Penn State-related teaching, learning, research, or work. Never input Level 3 or Level 4 information into any AI tool, including University-provided tools.
6+teaching: Penn State guidance says AI tools used by multiple people in a class, program, or administrative office require an accessibility review before use.
7+Evidence (en, 5de52d642e36): When an AI tool is used by more than one person (such as in a class, program, or administrative office) an accessibility review is required before use to comply with Policy AD69.
8+teaching: Penn State says instructors need department head and dean approval, or appropriate commonwealth campus academic leadership approval, before requesting AI-assisted grading software.
9+Evidence (en, 5de52d642e36): Before submitting a request for an AI-assisted grading software, approval is needed (email is sufficient) from both the department head and dean, or appropriate academic leadership at commonwealth campuses.
10+academic_integrity: Penn State's Academic Integrity page makes student use of content-generating AI tools course- and assignment-specific and warns that improper use can be an academic integrity violation.
11+Evidence (en, 987a9933f1c0): In some classes, students may use AI tools. In some classes, students may not use AI tools. And in some classes, students may use AI tools for some, but not all, assignments or tasks. This applies to the use of all content-generating AI tools... The improper use of these tools can be an academic integrity violation.
12+research: Penn State ORP guidance says researchers using generative AI must document process inputs, outputs, and prompts, verify AI-generated content, data, and references, and disclose use transparently in proposals, manuscripts, and publications.
13+Evidence (en, c3e965196811): Core responsibility include: Documenting research processes including inputs, outputs, and AI prompts. Taking primary responsibility for verifying all AI-generated content, data, and references. Disclosing use transparently in proposals, manuscripts, and publications.
14+privacy: Penn State ORP guidance says identifiable or restricted human-subjects data should not be input into generative AI systems unless IRB and data agreements explicitly approve it.
15+Evidence (en, c3e965196811): Do not input identifiable or "restricted" data into generative AI systems unless explicitly approved by IRB and data agreements.
16+academic_integrity: Penn State says academic integrity policies apply to student use or misuse of all tools, including university-approved AI tools.
17+Evidence (en, 4d696d6ad6cf): For students, academic integrity policies apply to the use or misuse of all tools, including those that are: university-approved, publicly available, offered by subscription, or purchased.

Claim changes

8 claim records

security_review

Penn State's AI Studio user agreement permits Level 1 and Level 2 data in AI Studio and prohibits Level 3 and Level 4 data.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%Evidence1Languagesen

privacy

Penn State guidance tells users not to use free personal AI accounts for Penn State-related teaching, learning, research, or work and never to input Level 3 or Level 4 information into any AI tool.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%Evidence1Languagesen

teaching

Penn State guidance says AI tools used by multiple people in a class, program, or administrative office require an accessibility review before use.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesen

teaching

Penn State says instructors need department head and dean approval, or appropriate commonwealth campus academic leadership approval, before requesting AI-assisted grading software.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

Penn State's Academic Integrity page makes student use of content-generating AI tools course- and assignment-specific and warns that improper use can be an academic integrity violation.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesen

research

Penn State ORP guidance says researchers using generative AI must document process inputs, outputs, and prompts, verify AI-generated content, data, and references, and disclose use transparently in proposals, manuscripts, and publications.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesen

privacy

Penn State ORP guidance says identifiable or restricted human-subjects data should not be input into generative AI systems unless IRB and data agreements explicitly approve it.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

Penn State says academic integrity policies apply to student use or misuse of all tools, including university-approved AI tools.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence88%Evidence1Languagesen