academic_integrity
Oregon State University Student Community Standards states that misuse of GenAI on an assignment could violate the university's Academic Integrity Policy, including plagiarism, cheating, or fabrication.
Review: Agent reviewed
Change log
Oregon State University
Source-check timeline, source snapshot hashes, claim review state, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed claim evidence.
Change summary
Current public record freshness and review state.
Oregon State University currently has 7 source-backed claim records and 4 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 17, 2026.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Claim/evidence diff preview
Diff-style preview built from current public claim/evidence records. Full old/new source diffs require paired historical snapshots.
Oregon State University current policy evidence
Inserted lines represent current public claim and evidence records in the source-backed dataset.
+14-0
11 # Oregon State University AI policy record
2+academic_integrity: Oregon State University Student Community Standards states that misuse of GenAI on an assignment could violate the university's Academic Integrity Policy, including plagiarism, cheating, or fabrication.
3+Evidence (en, 491c553afe71): The misuse of GenAI on an assignment could violate the university's Academic Integrity Policy. Relevant provisions that GenAI misuse could violate include: Plagiarism, Cheating, Fabrication.
4+privacy: Oregon State University guidance says instructors may not input student work into GenAI tools or applications that are not approved by OSU.
5+Evidence (en, 575dfecefe5b): To protect student privacy, meet legal obligations, and uphold our enterprise security: Instructors may not input student work into any GenAI tools or applications that are not approved by OSU.
6+teaching: Oregon State University strongly encourages instructors to include a syllabus statement about whether and how students should engage with GenAI in their course learning and assignments.
7+Evidence (en, 575dfecefe5b): Instructors are strongly encouraged to have a statement on their syllabus about whether and how students should be engaged with GenAI in their OSU course learning and assignments.
8+academic_integrity: Oregon State University tells students that faculty may set course-specific AI expectations and that students must follow the specific expectations for each course.
9+Evidence (en, 491c553afe71): At OSU, individual faculty have the freedom to set course-specific expectations for artificial intelligence use. It is important to recognize that different classes may have widely varying or even contradictory expectations. You must follow the specific expectations for each course.
10+privacy: Oregon State University says AI tools under review may only be used with unrestricted, publicly available data.
11+Evidence (en, fafe7992429b): Submit your AI tool for review by sending a request using the "Technology - I Need Something Form" on ServiceNow. While tools are under review they may only be used with unrestricted, publicly available data.
12+ai_tool_treatment: Oregon State University lists recommended and approved generative AI tools and pairs each listed tool with an approved data classification.
13+Evidence (en, fafe7992429b): Looking for the right AI tools? Start here with OSU's recommended and approved options. Approved Tool: A software application that has been officially provisioned, secured, and contracted by the university, with centralized support and controls in place.
14+teaching: Oregon State Ecampus faculty guidance recommends explicitly describing what AI use is and is not allowed on every assignment.
15+Evidence (en, 67277cbcadb6): Explicitly describe what is and is not allowed on every assignment. Include a statement as to why. Provide specific instructions and prompts that will help students appropriately use AI tools.
Claim changes
7 claim records
privacy
Oregon State University guidance says instructors may not input student work into GenAI tools or applications that are not approved by OSU.
Review: Agent reviewed
teaching
Oregon State University strongly encourages instructors to include a syllabus statement about whether and how students should engage with GenAI in their course learning and assignments.
Review: Agent reviewed
academic_integrity
Oregon State University tells students that faculty may set course-specific AI expectations and that students must follow the specific expectations for each course.
Review: Agent reviewed
privacy
Oregon State University says AI tools under review may only be used with unrestricted, publicly available data.
Review: Agent reviewed
ai_tool_treatment
Oregon State University lists recommended and approved generative AI tools and pairs each listed tool with an approved data classification.
Review: Agent reviewed
teaching
Oregon State Ecampus faculty guidance recommends explicitly describing what AI use is and is not allowed on every assignment.
Review: Agent reviewed
Source snapshots
4 source attributions
Guidance for AI Use in Teaching and Learning | Center for Teaching and Learning | Oregon State University
official_guidance checked May 17, 2026
Guidelines | AI | Oregon State University
official_guidance checked May 17, 2026
Practical Strategies - Artificial Intelligence Tools - Faculty Support | Oregon State Ecampus | OSU Degrees Online
official_guidance checked May 17, 2026
Using Artificial Intelligence | Student Community Standards | Office of the Dean of Students | Oregon State University
official_guidance checked May 17, 2026