Change log

Middlesex University

Source-check timeline, source snapshot hashes, claim review state, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed claim evidence.

Review: Agent reviewedLast checkedMay 20, 2026Last changedMay 20, 2026Claims5Sources5

University page Public JSON

Middlesex University currently has 5 source-backed claim records and 5 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 20, 2026.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

11 # Middlesex University AI policy record
2+academic_integrity: Middlesex guidance tells students to consult their module tutor before using AI for studies or assignments and says submitting AI-generated work as their own is a breach of academic integrity.
3+Evidence (en, 12bed11aa51c): Please consult with your module tutor before using AI for your studies or an assignment. It is crucial that you only use AI for your studies or an assignment where your tutor has advised regarding whether and how AI should be used for their module. AI can generate a wide range of materials, including text, images, code and even ideas. Using AI to support your learning can be beneficial if used responsibly and with integrity. However, submitting work generated by AI as your own work is a breach of academic integrity.
4+ai_tool_treatment: Middlesex states that generative AI tools may be used in assessments only as specified by the module leader, and allowed use requires written acknowledgment, extent of use, generation details including prompts, and citation or referencing where generated material is not adapted.
5+Evidence (en, 44761dc61905): Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools may be used in your assessments as specified by the module leader. Where the use of Generative AI is allowed you must provide, as a minimum: written acknowledgment of the use of generative artificial intelligence; the extent of use, and how generated materials were used; descriptions of how the information was generated (including the prompts used).
6+teaching: Middlesex guidance says assessment criteria should make clear when and how students can use AI for each assessment, and how to acknowledge AI use appropriately.
7+Evidence (en, 44761dc61905): It may be that some assessments explicitly ask students to work with Generative AI while others specify that AI should not be used, or used in specific ways. It must be made clear to students within the assessment criteria when and how they can use AI for each assessment, and how to acknowledge appropriately when they do so.
8+academic_integrity: Middlesex copyright guidance says AI-generated references should be authenticated before being requested or cited, and that fake AI references can result in academic misconduct proceedings if used in coursework assignments.
9+Evidence (en, 3230b3f1acf1): AI generated references must be authenticated before requesting copies from the library or citing them in your work. AI tools have been creating fake references which result in unnecessary work for the Inter- Library Loans team and can also result in academic misconduct proceedings if used in coursework assignments. You should always say where you have used AI to generate a piece of work for complete transparency.
10+privacy: Middlesex copyright guidance flags GDPR infringement as a legal and ethical issue where personal data is included in AI-sourced, uploaded, or generated content, and notes that AI tool terms may require users to own or have permission for uploaded content and grant retention and reuse permissions.
11+Evidence (en, 3230b3f1acf1): Other legal and ethical issues to consider include: GDPR infringement where personal data is included in the content sourced, uploaded and generated. Other issues to consider when uploading content to AI tools are: the terms of AI tools require the user to own the copyright or have permission to upload the content onto their platform and to grant permission for it to be retained and used indefinitely by the tool and it's users.

Claim changes

5 claim records

academic_integrity

Middlesex guidance tells students to consult their module tutor before using AI for studies or assignments and says submitting AI-generated work as their own is a breach of academic integrity.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

Middlesex copyright guidance says AI-generated references should be authenticated before being requested or cited, and that fake AI references can result in academic misconduct proceedings if used in coursework assignments.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence87%Evidence1Languagesen

privacy

Middlesex copyright guidance flags GDPR infringement as a legal and ethical issue where personal data is included in AI-sourced, uploaded, or generated content, and notes that AI tool terms may require users to own or have permission for uploaded content and grant retention and reuse permissions.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence84%Evidence1Languagesen

ai_tool_treatment

Middlesex states that generative AI tools may be used in assessments only as specified by the module leader, and allowed use requires written acknowledgment, extent of use, generation details including prompts, and citation or referencing where generated material is not adapted.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence91%Evidence1Languagesen

teaching

Middlesex guidance says assessment criteria should make clear when and how students can use AI for each assessment, and how to acknowledge AI use appropriately.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence88%Evidence1Languagesen