ai_tool_treatment
The Anuario Asia Pacifico El Colegio de Mexico requires authors to declare whether they used AI tools in any research phase and, if so, identify the tools, versions, and specific tasks.
Open, evidence-backed AI policy records for public reuse.
Change log
Source-check timeline, source snapshot hashes, claim review state, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed claim evidence.
Current public record freshness and review state.
El Colegio de México, A.C. currently has 4 source-backed claim records and 1 official source attribution. Latest tracked changed date: May 21, 2026.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Diff-style preview built from current public claim/evidence records. Full old/new source diffs require paired historical snapshots.
Inserted lines represent current public claim and evidence records in the source-backed dataset.
4 claim records
The Anuario Asia Pacifico El Colegio de Mexico requires authors to declare whether they used AI tools in any research phase and, if so, identify the tools, versions, and specific tasks.
Anuario Asia Pacifico reviewers are not authorized to use AI to prepare journal-requested reviews because submitted texts are unpublished and AI analysis would feed AI databases and compromise that status.
The Anuario Asia Pacifico El Colegio de Mexico states that it uses NotebookLM version 2025.06.18.773149930 to prepare summaries for historical-collection articles that lack that metadata.
For Anuario Asia Pacifico submissions, the Editorial Committee evaluates whether disclosed AI use is admissible before considering texts for evaluation.
1 source attribution
official_guidance checked May 21, 2026