University AI Policy Tracker

Open, evidence-backed AI policy records for public reuse.

APIGitHub

Change log

Chiba University

Source-check timeline, source snapshot hashes, claim review state, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed claim evidence.

Review: Agent reviewedLast checkedMay 20, 2026Last changedMay 20, 2026Claims5Sources1
University pagePublic JSON

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

Chiba University currently has 5 source-backed claim records and 1 official source attribution. Latest tracked changed date: May 20, 2026.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Claim/evidence diff preview

Diff-style preview built from current public claim/evidence records. Full old/new source diffs require paired historical snapshots.

Chiba University current policy evidence

Inserted lines represent current public claim and evidence records in the source-backed dataset.

+10-0
11 # Chiba University AI policy record
2+privacy: Chiba University's guideline tells students not to enter personal information or confidential information into generative AI and notes the information-leakage risk of entering unpublished research plans or research results.
3+Evidence (ja, 06a73425b426): 学生は、生成 AI を教育・学習で利用する際には、以下の諸点について留意する。生成 AI には個人情報や機密情報は入力しないこと（公開されても差し支えない情報のみ入力すること）。生成 AI に未公表の研究計画や研究成果などを入力すると、情報漏洩につながる危険性があること。
4+teaching: Chiba University's guideline says each course instructor judges whether generative AI use is consistent with class objectives and may prohibit or restrict generative AI use where it would significantly undermine achievement of educational objectives.
5+Evidence (ja, 06a73425b426): 生成 AI の授業での利用は、それが授業の目的に合致することが前提であり、合致するかどうかは、それぞれの授業の担当教員が判断する。生成 AI の利用によって、教育目標の達成が大きく損なわれる授業においては、教員は受講生に生成 AI の利用を禁止・制限することができる。
6+ai_tool_treatment: Chiba University's teaching-and-learning guideline says the university does not uniformly prohibit generative AI use in teaching and learning and promotes learning about, with, and aside from generative AI according to purpose.
7+Evidence (ja, 06a73425b426): 千葉大学は生成 AI の教育・学習での利用を一律に禁止することはせず、その目的に応じて、「生成 AI についての学び」「生成 AI を用いた学び」「生成 AI によらない学び」をそれぞれ推進する。
8+teaching: Chiba University's guideline says that when instructors prohibit or restrict generative AI use in a class, they should clearly state that in the syllabus or other course handouts and explain the reason to students.
9+Evidence (ja, 06a73425b426): 授業において生成 AI の利用を禁止・制限する際には、教員はその旨を当該授業のシラバス等に明記する。また、なぜ利用を禁止・制限するのかを受講生にわかりやすく説明することが望まれる。
10+teaching: Chiba University's guideline says that when instructors allow students to use generative AI in class, instructors should consider fairness because outputs may differ depending on external-service registration and paid or free versions.
11+Evidence (ja, 06a73425b426): 授業において学生に生成 AI の利用を認める場合には、外部サービス利用登録の有無、有料版か無料版かなどにより、成果物等に差が生まれ得るため、教員は公平性に配慮する。

Claim changes

5 claim records

teaching

Chiba University's guideline says that when instructors allow students to use generative AI in class, instructors should consider fairness because outputs may differ depending on external-service registration and paid or free versions.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%Evidence1Languagesja

privacy

Chiba University's guideline tells students not to enter personal information or confidential information into generative AI and notes the information-leakage risk of entering unpublished research plans or research results.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence1Languagesja

teaching

Chiba University's guideline says that when instructors prohibit or restrict generative AI use in a class, they should clearly state that in the syllabus or other course handouts and explain the reason to students.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%Evidence1Languagesja

teaching

Chiba University's guideline says each course instructor judges whether generative AI use is consistent with class objectives and may prohibit or restrict generative AI use where it would significantly undermine achievement of educational objectives.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesja

ai_tool_treatment

Chiba University's teaching-and-learning guideline says the university does not uniformly prohibit generative AI use in teaching and learning and promotes learning about, with, and aside from generative AI according to purpose.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%Evidence1Languagesja

Source snapshots

1 source attribution