Change log

RMIT University

Release-to-release tracker diff with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

RMIT University currently has 9 source-backed claim records and 5 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 14, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.

Diff categories

Semantic classification for this release diff.

Policy text0Newly extracted0Evidence0Source snapshots0Source text0Source added0Source removed0

Release diff

Unified tracker diff generated from the previous and current public release snapshots.

No tracker claim/evidence/source changes are recorded for this university in the latest public release.

Claim changes

9 claim records

source_status

RMIT has a Responsible Artificial Intelligence procedure that establishes ethical principles and a risk-based framework for safe and responsible AI adoption across RMIT Group functions and activities.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

RMIT academic integrity guidance says students cannot use AI to complete or contribute to an assessment task unless specifically allowed, pass off unreferenced AI-produced ideas as their own, or submit AI-produced content they cannot understand or explain.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence1Languagesen

security_review

Before RMIT initiates its AI Governance Framework for an AI initiative, existing governance assessments include Privacy Impact Assessment, Security Risk Assessment, and Third-Party Risk Assessment.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

RMIT assessment guidance tells students to review and fact-check AI outputs and acknowledge AI tools when those tools contribute ideas, text, images, or other content to assessment work.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

RMIT says whether students may use AI in assessments depends on their course and Course Coordinator instructions, and students should check with the Course Coordinator if unsure.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesen

ai_tool_treatment

RMIT describes Val as its generative AI tool for eligible students, powered by OpenAI models, and says course guides determine whether Val or other AI tools are appropriate for learning and assessment.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesen

privacy

RMIT's Val guidance says data shared with Val is kept private, secure and confidential, is not shared with OpenAI or other external organisations outside RMIT, and should not include personal, sensitive, or health information.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesen

ai_tool_treatment

RMIT student AI learning guidance says RMIT has approved tools with AI capability and that students should be cautious when using public AI tools outside that approved set.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%Evidence1Languagesen

privacy

RMIT tells students to verify AI outputs and treat public AI tools as privacy, security, and reputation risks because inputs could be shared.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence91%Evidence1Languagesen

Source snapshots

5 source attributions

RMIT University AI Policy Tracker Release Diff | University AI Policy Tracker