版本差异
University of Liverpool
针对...的统一追踪器差异 public-release-20260523-001。未发布完整的源页面文本；仅显示简短的原始语言证据片段以供引用参考。
统一差异
基于公开版本快照生成的版本间跟踪器变更。
大学 of Liverpool public-release-20260523-001 差异
初始跟踪发布。
+33-0
11 # University of Liverpool AI policy diff
22 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
33 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
4+source_status: The University of Liverpool has a central AI policies and guidance hub that collates generative AI guidance covering golden rules, legal/security/data protection, learning/teaching/assessment, and research.
5+Evidence (en, c498e5be4975): On this page, we have collated our University guidance on generative AI including golden rules, legal, security and data protection, as well as existing guidance on using AI in learning, teaching and assessment, and finally, guidance on generative AI for research.
6+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-14T22:35:00.000Z
47 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
58 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
9+ai_tool_treatment: For University work, Liverpool says staff and students should use Microsoft Copilot as the endorsed generative AI chat tool, provided through the University's Microsoft 365 environment with data governance and safeguards aligned to institutional requirements.
10+Evidence (en, ebc4570e49fd): For University work, staff and students should use Microsoft Copilot – the endorsed generative AI chat tool. Copilot is provided through the University's Microsoft 365 environment, with data governance and safeguards aligned to our institutional requirements.
11+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-14T22:35:00.000Z
612 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
713 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
14+privacy: Liverpool's legal, security, and data-protection guidance says GenAI use must comply with UK GDPR and that personal information should not be uploaded or shared with AI tools unless necessary and appropriate safeguards are in place.
15+Evidence (en, e8d63788f7f7): Any use of generative AI must be compliant with UK General Data Protection Regulations (GDPR). No personal information should be uploaded or shared with any AI tool unless it is necessary, and appropriate safeguarding and protection measures are in place.
16+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-14T22:35:00.000Z
817 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
918 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
19+academic_integrity: Liverpool lists unacceptable uses of generative AI in education, including unreviewed copying of AI-generated content into assessment materials or feedback, using AI for grades or final assessment decisions, uploading protected student or confidential information to public AI platforms without required review, and creating or modifying official policy documents without appropriate review and approval.
20+Evidence (en, e5d1080409e9): Unacceptable uses of generative AI in education include copying and pasting AI-generated content directly into assessment briefs, marking rubrics, or feedback without review; using AI to generate grades or make final assessment decisions; uploading student work, personal data, or confidential information to public AI platforms without first completing a Data Protection Impact Assessment.
21+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-14T22:35:00.000Z
1022 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1123 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
24+teaching: Liverpool's central GenAI learning, teaching, and assessment page says the University has devised guidance to help academics and students understand its position and make informed decisions on when and how to use GenAI.
25+Evidence (en, e5d1080409e9): The University of Liverpool has devised guidance to help both academics and students understand the University’s position on GenAI in teaching, learning and assessment, and to make informed decisions on when and how to use it.
26+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-14T22:35:00.000Z
1227 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1328 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
29+other: Liverpool's golden rules frame GenAI as a support tool rather than a substitute, and include expectations to acknowledge AI use where required, protect personal and sensitive data, and verify facts.
30+Evidence (en, 30ce6807f5aa): Use AI to support your work, but do not copy-paste outputs into assessed work, research submissions, or official documents without review and attribution. Where required, acknowledge AI use in your work. Include the tool name, version, and date of use for transparency.
31+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-14T22:38:00.000Z
1432 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1533 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
34+research: Liverpool's research guidance says the University supports responsible and ethical GAI use in research, while expecting researchers and professional services colleagues to apply critical judgement, maintain transparency, prioritize integrity, and remain accountable for research outputs and related materials.
35+Evidence (en, dc99c7a5a316): The University expects all researchers and professional services colleagues to apply critical judgement, maintain transparency, and prioritise integrity at all times. Users remain fully accountable for all research outputs, submissions, analyses, and assessment materials - regardless of whether AI tools were used in their preparation.
36+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-14T22:39:00.000Z
1637 ## Source attribution added
1738 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
39+Source https://www.liverpool.ac.uk/about/the-university/reports-policies-and-governance/ai-at-liverpool/foundations-of-ai/ snapshot ebc4570e49fdb8a336414fde220f1646a96f222e9d0591c3d5b05f2ecef5c38e
40+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-14T22:35:00.000Z
1841 ## Source attribution added
1942 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
43+Source https://www.liverpool.ac.uk/about/the-university/reports-policies-and-governance/ai-at-liverpool/policies-and-guidance/ snapshot c498e5be49758b95222e2cdc981a1be54d59b9e898b01ba05fc9dcfa94128157
44+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-14T22:35:00.000Z
2045 ## Source attribution added
2146 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
47+Source https://www.liverpool.ac.uk/about/the-university/reports-policies-and-governance/ai-at-liverpool/policies-and-guidance/golden-rules/ snapshot 30ce6807f5aa50541739241017dab9f1e41d1256e0f48c2b91fa51882ee116d4
48+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-14T22:38:00.000Z
2249 ## Source attribution added
2350 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
51+Source https://www.liverpool.ac.uk/about/the-university/reports-policies-and-governance/ai-at-liverpool/policies-and-guidance/guidance-for-research/ snapshot dc99c7a5a316610f03570aa8a1202e89bf47477c24f1738cdffa344baf622835
52+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-14T22:39:00.000Z
2453 ## Source attribution added
2554 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
55+Source https://www.liverpool.ac.uk/about/the-university/reports-policies-and-governance/ai-at-liverpool/policies-and-guidance/guidance-learning-teaching-and-assessment/ snapshot e5d1080409e9a0c1f7890626167ffd70b8a49fbf0d5316e57ab2689b586f43e6
56+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-14T22:35:00.000Z
2657 ## Source attribution added
2758 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
59+Source https://www.liverpool.ac.uk/about/the-university/reports-policies-and-governance/ai-at-liverpool/policies-and-guidance/legal-security-and-data-protection/ snapshot e8d63788f7f7c96b4d66f9f78a0834d016523810c734a7fad3a197e9594495e6
60+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-14T22:35:00.000Z
如何阅读此差异
追踪器发布元数据，而非大学发布时间点的直接证明。
新提取的主张是追踪器的新增项，不一定是大学新发布的。来源快照变更意味着同一 URL 产生了不同的哈希值；这可能是政策文本、布局、导航或元数据的变化。
边界
仅限追踪器元数据
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.