版本差异
University of Copenhagen
针对...的统一追踪器差异 public-release-20260523-001。未发布完整的源页面文本；仅显示简短的原始语言证据片段以供引用参考。
统一差异
基于公开版本快照生成的版本间跟踪器变更。
大学 of Copenhagen public-release-20260523-001 差异
初始跟踪发布。
+23-0
11 # University of Copenhagen AI policy diff
22 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
33 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
4+privacy: University of Copenhagen employee guidance says employees may not enter personal data or confidential or copyrighted information into generative AI tools and should use only the licensed Copilot Enterprise tool for UCPH work.
5+Evidence (en, 78f1eb1ac066): As an employee at UCPH, you can now read the first guidelines on how you are allowed to use generative AI tools in your work at the University. You may not enter personal data. You may not enter confidential or copyrighted information. Only use Copilot Enterprise for which UCPH has bought a license.
6+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-14T04:06:39.000Z
47 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
58 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
9+ai_tool_treatment: University of Copenhagen guidance says the Copilot Enterprise-only guideline means employees must avoid using ChatGPT or other non-licensed generative AI in their work for UCPH.
10+Evidence (en, 78f1eb1ac066): The guideline to only use Copilot Enterprise means that, as an employee, you must avoid using ChatGPT or other non-licensed generative AI in your work for UCPH.
11+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-14T04:06:39.000Z
612 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
713 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
14+research: University of Copenhagen PhD guidance says AI-assisted technologies used in a thesis must be clearly disclosed and described, cannot be listed as an author, and leave the PhD student responsible for accuracy, integrity, and originality.
15+Evidence (en, 30c3a8ee5327): if you use AI-assisted technologies in your thesis it must be clearly disclosed, and the use must be described. The AI-assisted technology cannot be listed as an author. You are therefore solely responsible for the accuracy, integrity, and originality of the work.
16+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-14T04:08:17.000Z
817 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
918 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
19+research: University of Copenhagen authorship guidelines say AI-assisted technologies used in scholarly work must be clearly stated and declared; chatbots cannot be listed as co-authors, and researchers using AI-assisted technologies must be able to account for the results.
20+Evidence (en, 2fbd9f81a9cb): If AI-assisted technologies such as large language models, chatbots or image creating programs have been used in the scholarly work, this must be clearly stated and declared in the publication. Chatbots and the like cannot be listed as co-authors of scholarly work; researchers who use AI-assisted technologies in their work must be able to account for the results.
21+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-14T04:08:17.000Z
1022 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1123 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
24+security_review: The University of Copenhagen researcher tools page says staff and students may use Microsoft Copilot, and that work needing a generative AI tool should primarily use Microsoft Copilot Enterprise because it is security-approved and licensed by the university.
25+Evidence (en, 43ee56966fdd): Copilot, developed by Microsoft, is licensed by University of Copenhagen, allowing both staff and students to use it. If you need a generative AI tool for your work, you should primarily use Microsoft Copilot Enterprise, which is security-approved and licensed by University of Copenhagen.
26+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-14T04:07:57.000Z
1227 ## Source attribution added
1328 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
29+Source https://kub.ku.dk/english/researchsupport/tools-for-researchers/ snapshot 43ee56966fdd2006de8abd14963e5986a53510b95cd31699b1b50dcc732f4934
30+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-14T04:07:57.000Z
1431 ## Source attribution added
1532 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
33+Source https://phd.ku.dk/english/regulations/ai-assisted-technologies/2026-01-05_Guideline_on_the_use_of_Ai-assisted_technologies.pdf snapshot 30c3a8ee532752bf0c3e091e7292c31506b46ee6d0f66667bc112397061ffa86
34+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-14T04:08:17.000Z
1635 ## Source attribution added
1736 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
37+Source https://pkunet-shared.ku.dk/newsroom/news/Pages/Three-guidelines-and-a-new-tool-for-using-AI.aspx snapshot 78f1eb1ac066448aa2842c6e4b01d8d05789d4d4cfcfacb632a985b316207682
38+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-14T04:06:39.000Z
1839 ## Source attribution added
1940 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
41+Source https://praksisudvalget.ku.dk/english/rules_guide/University_of_Copenhagen_guidelines_on_authorship_of_scholarly_publications.pdf snapshot 2fbd9f81a9cb1ab68af31f0bfd5d0d4c5b771b2a1d366050d9fbb566f82b2fa8
42+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-14T04:08:17.000Z
如何阅读此差异
追踪器发布元数据，而非大学发布时间点的直接证明。
新提取的主张是追踪器的新增项，不一定是大学新发布的。来源快照变更意味着同一 URL 产生了不同的哈希值；这可能是政策文本、布局、导航或元数据的变化。
边界
仅限追踪器元数据
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.