版本差异
Rutgers University–New Brunswick
针对...的统一追踪器差异 public-release-20260523-001。未发布完整的源页面文本；仅显示简短的原始语言证据片段以供引用参考。
统一差异
基于公开版本快照生成的版本间跟踪器变更。
Rutgers University–New Brunswick public-release-20260523-001 差异
初始跟踪发布。
+14-0
11 # Rutgers University–New Brunswick AI policy diff
22 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
33 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
4+ai_tool_treatment: Rutgers states that only Rutgers-approved AI tools should be used at the university to protect university data and ensure appropriate use.
5+Evidence (en-US, 251292f2c495): To protect university data and ensure appropriate use, only Rutgers-approved AI tools should be used at the university. You can view a list of available tools provided by OIT .
6+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-16T12:49:03.000Z
47 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
58 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
9+privacy: Rutgers states that confidential information, protected health information, and proprietary Rutgers information may not be appropriate for use in AI applications and systems.
10+Evidence (en-US, 251292f2c495): Confidential information, Protected Health Information (PHI), and other proprietary Rutgers information may not be appropriate for use in AI applications and systems. For additional guidance, please consult this data classification tool.
11+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-16T12:49:03.000Z
612 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
713 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
14+academic_integrity: Rutgers states that AI tools should not be considered permissible for coursework unless instructors clearly state or communicate that use is allowed.
15+Evidence (en-US, 251292f2c495): Though AI tools are widely available to students, they should not be considered permissible for coursework unless clearly stated or communicated by instructors. Students are responsible for understanding and abiding by their program and instructors’ guidance or rules on the use of AI.
16+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-16T12:49:03.000Z
817 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
918 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
19+teaching: Rutgers says faculty should consider giving students guidance on AI use to support learning and coursework.
20+Evidence (en-US, 251292f2c495): Faculty should consider providing guidance to students on the use of AI to support learning and coursework, and students are encouraged to review course materials and speak with their instructors to understand any specific expectations related to AI.
21+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-16T12:49:03.000Z
1022 ## Source attribution added
1123 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
24+Source https://it.rutgers.edu/ai/guidance-on-the-use-of-ai-at-rutgers/ snapshot 251292f2c495df2a2e7e1c86dfd20278597da3d8fb6eb778c599d265ce11031c
25+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-16T12:49:03.000Z
如何阅读此差异
追踪器发布元数据，而非大学发布时间点的直接证明。
新提取的主张是追踪器的新增项，不一定是大学新发布的。来源快照变更意味着同一 URL 产生了不同的哈希值；这可能是政策文本、布局、导航或元数据的变化。
边界
仅限追踪器元数据
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.