版本差异

Peking University

针对...的统一追踪器差异 public-release-20260523-001。未发布完整的源页面文本;仅显示简短的原始语言证据片段以供引用参考。

统一差异

基于公开版本快照生成的版本间跟踪器变更。

Peking University public-release-20260523-001 差异

初始跟踪发布。

+12-0
11 # Peking University AI policy diff
22 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
33 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
4+other: Peking University's AI Scientific Integrity Platform defines AI use boundaries across seven research stages: topic selection, literature search and management, research design and implementation, paper writing, paper submission, paper review, and grant application and review.
5+Evidence (zh, d1e587a8dab6): 覆盖论文选题、文献检索与管理、研究设计与实施、论文写作、论文投稿、论文评审、基金申报与评审七个研究环节。
46 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
57 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
8+other: Peking University's AI use guidelines apply to faculty, students, researchers, and administrators who use generative AI or other AI-assisted tools in teaching, research, and management activities.
9+Evidence (zh, d1e587a8dab6): 适用于在教学、科研与管理活动中引入生成式人工智能或其他AI辅助工具的教师、学生、科研人员与管理人员。
610 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
711 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
12+other: Peking University classifies AI use in research into three tiers: open use (low risk, broadly applicable), limited use (moderate risk, requires verification and constraints), and prohibited use (high risk or violation, forbidden).
13+Evidence (zh, d1e587a8dab6): 开放使用:指在特定的环节或场景中,应用生成式AI的风险较低或几乎不存在风险,具有普适性或广泛适用性的情形。有限使用:指在特定的环节或场景中,应用生成式AI存在一定的风险,需要进行核查、规范或约束的情形。不可使用:指在特定的环节或场景中,应用生成式AI存在高风险或违规,禁止使用的情形。
814 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
915 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
16+other: Peking University distinguishes two levels of AI involvement in research: instrumental assistance (using AI as a tool to handle routine or repetitive tasks) and replacement completion (using AI to independently complete tasks involving core intellectual contribution and creative labor).
17+Evidence (zh, d1e587a8dab6): 工具性辅助:指将生成式AI作为一种增强人类能力的工具,用于处理流程化、重复性或辅助性的任务。替代性完成:指将生成式AI用于独立完成本应由科研工作者承担的、涉及核心智力贡献和创造性劳动的任务。
1018 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1119 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
20+other: Peking University's AI Scientific Integrity Platform synthesizes AI use policies from 18 domestic and international sources, including Chinese government agencies (MOST, NSFC), Chinese universities (Fudan, Nanjing, Sichuan), international bodies (EU Commission, NIH), and universities (Harvard, Yale, Cambridge, UCL, Oxford, MIT).
21+Evidence (zh, d1e587a8dab6): 科技部监督司—负责任研究行为规范指引 国家自然科学基金—科研诚信规范手册 中国科学技术信息研究所—学术出版中AIGC使用边界指南2.0 中国科学院—关于在科研活动中规范使用人工智能技术的诚信提醒 复旦大学—关于在本科毕业论文(设计)中使用AI工具的规定 南京大学—关于本科生规范使用生成式人工智能工具的指导意见 四川大学—四川大学本科教育教学人工智能工具应用规范 欧盟委员会—Living Guidelines on the Responsible Use of Generative AI in Research 美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)-The Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence Technologies is Prohibited for the NIH Peer Review ProcessSpringer Nature-Editorial Policies on AI 哈佛大学-Generative AI Guidelines 耶鲁大学-Guidelines for the Use of Generative AI Tools 剑桥大学-Cambridge launches AI research ethics policy 伦敦大学学院-GenAI and academic integrity in assessment 牛津大学-Policy for using Generative AI in Research: guidelines for researchers and professional staff...
1222 ## Source attribution added
1323 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
24+Source http://scielab.pku.edu.cn/aigc/guidelines/overview.html snapshot d1e587a8dab6502a4ef59e10633212e32e1682744f543a38d437eb4c75da1186
25+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-06T04:55:45Z

如何阅读此差异

追踪器发布元数据,而非大学发布时间点的直接证明。

新提取的主张是追踪器的新增项,不一定是大学新发布的。来源快照变更意味着同一 URL 产生了不同的哈希值;这可能是政策文本、布局、导航或元数据的变化。

边界

仅限追踪器元数据

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.