版本差异
Indian Institute of Science
针对...的统一追踪器差异 public-release-20260523-001。未发布完整的源页面文本；仅显示简短的原始语言证据片段以供引用参考。
统一差异
基于公开版本快照生成的版本间跟踪器变更。
Indian Institute of Science public-release-20260523-001 差异
初始跟踪发布。
+13-0
11 # Indian Institute of Science AI policy diff
22 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
33 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
4+privacy: IISc faculty-facing AI guidance says entering data into an open AI tool should be treated like posting it publicly unless there are strong reasons to trust the tool, and says not to input sensitive, confidential, or restricted information into open AI tools.
5+Evidence (en, 704962d44534): Hence, entering data into an AI tool should be regarded as equivalent to posting it in public (unless there are strong reasons to trust that a specific tool will not use your queries). Do not enter, contribute, or otherwise input sensitive, confidential, or restricted information into open AI tools.
6+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-15T13:22:00.000Z
47 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
58 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
9+teaching: An IISc committee report recommends 'allowed with attribution' as the default institutional policy for AI tool use in courses, while allowing instructors, departments, divisions, or programmes to tailor the baseline policy.
10+Evidence (en, 711c21895ddd): We recommend allowed with attribution as the default institutional policy. This default policy should be articulated via an appropriate channel, such as the Student Handbook. Furthermore, this default policy can be tailored at each level in the hierarchy: individual course instructor, department, division, or programme.
11+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-15T13:21:00.000Z
612 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
713 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
14+research: The IISc committee report recommends full, precise, and transparent disclosure of generative AI use in research publications, theses, and other Institute documents, with details depending on how the tools were used.
15+Evidence (en, 711c21895ddd): Use of generative AI should be fully disclosed, with attribution that is precise, transparent, and with adequate details. In particular, when one is using generative AI in publications, one should follow the guidelines of the Journal, Conference, or Publisher. For thesis and other Institute documents, one should follow the guidelines for publications given below.
16+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-15T13:21:00.000Z
817 ## Source attribution added
918 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
19+Source https://iisc.ac.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/Report-of-Committee-on-AI-Tools-for-Education-and-Research.pdf snapshot 711c21895ddd1b4d94fd830bef540b4d8c60d99d43ff56491d311523eeb0224e
20+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-15T13:21:00.000Z
1021 ## Source attribution added
1122 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
23+Source https://www.iisc.ac.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/Generative_AI_Science_faculty.pdf snapshot 704962d4453473a4636aab056db910db21caae7e94e3f7e4b53f4386110fa9cb
24+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-15T13:22:00.000Z
如何阅读此差异
追踪器发布元数据，而非大学发布时间点的直接证明。
新提取的主张是追踪器的新增项，不一定是大学新发布的。来源快照变更意味着同一 URL 产生了不同的哈希值；这可能是政策文本、布局、导航或元数据的变化。
边界
仅限追踪器元数据
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.