版本差异
Effat University
针对...的统一追踪器差异 public-release-20260523-001。未发布完整的源页面文本；仅显示简短的原始语言证据片段以供引用参考。
统一差异
基于公开版本快照生成的版本间跟踪器变更。
Effat University public-release-20260523-001 差异
初始跟踪发布。
+23-0
11 # Effat University AI policy diff
22 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
33 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
4+other: Effat University Library provides a generative-AI resources guide that introduces AI concepts, impacts, approaches, and examples such as ChatGPT, Copilot, and Gemini.
5+Evidence (en, 75c9119a7719): Welcome to this library guide on artificial intelligence/AI. The guide is a valuable resource that will allow you to get more familiar with AI, including some key concepts, impacts, and approaches.
6+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-21T14:20:00.000Z
47 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
58 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
9+academic_integrity: Effat University's library AI guide warns that generative-AI tools can produce inaccurate or false citations and advises users to verify citations for accuracy and credit the underlying source rather than the AI tool when citing sourced information.
10+Evidence (en, a51a8c72b705): Tools like ChatGPT, which use Generative AI, have produced inaccurate citations. Even if the citations refer to actual papers, the content derived from them in ChatGPT may still be incorrect. It is always essential to verify citations for accuracy.
11+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-21T14:20:00.000Z
612 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
713 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
14+academic_integrity: Effat University's library AI guide says using generative-AI text without proper citation is considered plagiarism according to Effat University, while policies for using and crediting AI tools may vary by class.
15+Evidence (en, a51a8c72b705): Although a generative AI tool may not be classified as a "person," using text generated by such a tool without proper citation is still considered plagiarism, according to Effat University, because the work is not the researcher's original creation.
16+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-21T14:20:00.000Z
817 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
918 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
19+academic_integrity: Effat University's library AI guide advises users who decide to use ChatGPT or other AI technology for writing to be transparent with teachers and publishers and comply with applicable policies.
20+Evidence (en, 224cba9d80b1): Suppose you decide to use ChatGPT or any other AI technology for writing. In that case, being transparent with your teachers and publishers and ensuring you comply with their policies is essential.
21+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-21T14:20:00.000Z
1022 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1123 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
24+research: Effat University's library AI guide provides research-support guidance on prompt design, stating that well-structured prompts can help AI tools produce more accurate, meaningful, and relevant results.
25+Evidence (en, 60001a688d69): Good prompts enhance AI performance: A well-structured prompt enables the AI to deliver accurate, meaningful, and relevant results. On the other hand, poorly written prompts can lead to irrelevant or unhelpful outputs, hindering your research process.
26+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-21T14:20:00.000Z
1227 ## Source attribution added
1328 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
29+Source https://effat.libguides.com/c.php?g=1444046 snapshot 75c9119a771980cde938005c09d68ae1a9d10d351a70d1af51e5c5fa54c30cc9
30+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-21T14:20:00.000Z
1431 ## Source attribution added
1532 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
33+Source https://effat.libguides.com/c.php?g=1444046&p=10727441 snapshot 60001a688d69470199184c65fa530ecc4b609b98d43e1e0c54925adb4c93e1a9
34+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-21T14:20:00.000Z
1635 ## Source attribution added
1736 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
37+Source https://effat.libguides.com/c.php?g=1444046&p=10727449 snapshot a51a8c72b705fcdb8373ffdc64c920f0ae00bb6ff8bc4b5a0cdf0a40c884c42f
38+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-21T14:20:00.000Z
1839 ## Source attribution added
1940 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
41+Source https://effat.libguides.com/c.php?g=1444046&p=10727450 snapshot 224cba9d80b190ee2a77a180c0b8a1cb7d8cf3b45356f7d479a9932b7a7aba80
42+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-21T14:20:00.000Z
如何阅读此差异
追踪器发布元数据，而非大学发布时间点的直接证明。
新提取的主张是追踪器的新增项，不一定是大学新发布的。来源快照变更意味着同一 URL 产生了不同的哈希值；这可能是政策文本、布局、导航或元数据的变化。
边界
仅限追踪器元数据
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.