版本差异
Charles Darwin University
针对...的统一追踪器差异 public-release-20260523-001。未发布完整的源页面文本；仅显示简短的原始语言证据片段以供引用参考。
统一差异
基于公开版本快照生成的版本间跟踪器变更。
Charles Darwin University public-release-20260523-001 差异
初始跟踪发布。
+32-0
11 # Charles Darwin University AI policy diff
22 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
33 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
4+academic_integrity: CDU's academic integrity guidance identifies inappropriate or unsanctioned GenAI use as academic misconduct and says CDU will not tolerate misrepresenting AI-generated content as a student's own work or failing to disclose AI use.
5+Evidence (en, d7737b9068c5): Types of Academic Misconduct include Generative artificial intelligence: Inappropriate or unsanctioned use of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) tools. CDU staff and students will not tolerate: Misrepresenting AI generated content as your own; Failure to disclose use of AI.
6+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-16T21:28:00.000Z
47 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
58 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
9+privacy: CDU prohibits employees and students from putting confidential or sensitive information or intellectual property into GenAI platforms.
10+Evidence (en, 80db2f71c977): Employees and students must ensure they do not put confidential or sensitive information or intellectual property into gen AI platforms.
11+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-16T21:22:00.000Z
612 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
713 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
14+academic_integrity: CDU requires students and employees to be transparent about and disclose GenAI use, with academic integrity guidance applying to students.
15+Evidence (en, 80db2f71c977): Students and employees must be transparent about and disclose gen AI use and should refer to the Academic Integrity Policy for more guidance on academic integrity.
16+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-16T21:22:00.000Z
817 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
918 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
19+ai_tool_treatment: Charles Darwin University's formal Generative Artificial Intelligence Policy sets principles for GenAI use and applies to all CDU employees and students.
20+Evidence (en, 80db2f71c977): This policy sets out principles for the use of generative artificial intelligence (gen AI) at the University. This policy applies to all employees and students of the University.
21+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-16T21:22:00.000Z
1022 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1123 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
24+research: For HDR studies, CDU guidance says GenAI may assist but should not replace a candidate's original intellectual contribution, GenAI use should be clearly acknowledged, and supervisors or external examiners should not use GenAI to critique or assess candidate work.
25+Evidence (en, b47798a2bd8d): GenAI tools may assist but should not replace the candidate's original intellectual contribution. Do I need to acknowledge GenAI use? Yes--clearly. Can I use GenAI to read, critique, or offer feedback on student work? No. Can I use GenAI to assess or critique candidate work? No.
26+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-16T21:31:00.000Z
1227 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1328 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
29+procurement: CDU says it does not generally maintain a static approved, preferred, or endorsed GenAI platform list, and Design Authority approval is required before institutionally adopting new GenAI platforms that are implemented, integrated, or used to process University data.
30+Evidence (en, 80db2f71c977): The University does not generally maintain a static list of "approved", "preferred", or "endorsed" gen AI platforms. Approval by the Design Authority is required prior to the adoption of new gen AI platforms where they are to be institutionally implemented, integrated with University systems, or used to process University data.
31+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-16T21:22:00.000Z
1432 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1533 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
34+research: CDU's GenAI policy says GenAI use is never acceptable in peer review, in generating substantive content of research outputs including HDR theses, or in writing critical components of ethics applications.
35+Evidence (en, 80db2f71c977): There are circumstances when the use of gen AI is never acceptable. This includes in the conduct of peer review, the generation of substantive content of research outputs, including HDR theses, and in the writing of the critical components of ethics applications.
36+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-16T21:22:00.000Z
1637 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1738 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
39+security_review: CDU staff may use generative AI tools for legitimate work purposes, but must not enter confidential, sensitive, or personally identifiable University information unless it is appropriately de-identified or redacted; tools with unclear hosting, ownership, or data handling must not be used with University information.
40+Evidence (en, 87b587956c5a): Staff may use generative AI tools for legitimate work purposes; however, University information that is confidential, sensitive, or personally identifiable must not be entered into such tools unless it has been appropriately de-identified or redacted. Where the hosting location, ownership, or data-handling practices of a generative AI tool are unknown or unclear, the tool must not be used with University information.
41+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-16T21:25:00.000Z
1842 ## Source attribution added
1943 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
44+Source https://policies.cdu.edu.au/view-current.php?id=243 snapshot 80db2f71c977def00552b55ef1c0cd52e86c43e0ad87eb9603b23b629b1b3a8d
45+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-16T21:22:00.000Z
2046 ## Source attribution added
2147 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
48+Source https://policies.cdu.edu.au/view-current.php?id=55&version=3 snapshot 87b587956c5ac09120ba9b0f561e13946f65bec5728f988d710d185a64b40a26
49+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-16T21:25:00.000Z
2250 ## Source attribution added
2351 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
52+Source https://www.cdu.edu.au/current-students/student-code-conduct/academic-integrity snapshot d7737b9068c56193a56c1402564f530e7c0725c49f8289339a5608556a066bc6
53+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-16T21:28:00.000Z
2454 ## Source attribution added
2555 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
56+Source https://www.cdu.edu.au/library/language-and-learning-support/study-skills/research-communication/using-generative-ai-genai-hdr-studies snapshot b47798a2bd8df5eb0324137918536540f6913f94265bd2bdece929d8fa51e144
57+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-16T21:31:00.000Z
如何阅读此差异
追踪器发布元数据，而非大学发布时间点的直接证明。
新提取的主张是追踪器的新增项，不一定是大学新发布的。来源快照变更意味着同一 URL 产生了不同的哈希值；这可能是政策文本、布局、导航或元数据的变化。
边界
仅限追踪器元数据
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.