變更紀錄
追蹤器歷史：0 筆發布紀錄。
目前公開紀錄的時效性與審查狀態。
5 條當前主張；3 個官方來源。
此頁面整合了所有公開發布版本差異，適用於 Universidade de Brasília。個別發布快照仍可從其特定版本 URL 取得。
此追蹤器歷史紀錄中無已記錄的更新。
本追蹤器並非法律意見，亦非學術誠信建議；除非所連結的來源為大學本身的官方網頁，否則亦不構成大學的正式聲明。
新擷取的主張屬於追蹤器的新增項目，不一定是大學新近發布的內容。來源快照的變更表示同一來源網址的雜湊值有所改變，本身並不等同於政策變動。
此次版本差異的語意分類。
僅顯示具備完全符合 Claim ID 的已記錄比較。
此追蹤器歷史紀錄中無已記錄的更新。
追蹤器歷史：0 筆發布紀錄。
現行主張紀錄：5。
The UnB-hosted Anuario Antropologico author instructions state that the use and type of generative AI should be made explicit in submitted materials for evaluation when applicable, and recommend mentioning any AI-tool use in manuscript preparation.
The UnB-hosted journal Sociedade e Estado says it does not currently use AI resources in publication evaluation and editing, and tells authors that any material or content generated by an AI application should be reported in the abstract and methods section or equivalent.
The UnB-hosted Revista de Estudos e Pesquisas sobre as Americas instructs reviewers not to use generative AI to analyze or summarize submitted articles, and prohibits importing unpublished manuscripts, proposals, files, images, or related information into generative AI tools.
The UnB-hosted Revista de Estudos e Pesquisas sobre as Americas states that generative AI cannot be considered an author, and that only a natural person can take responsibility for and sign the submitted contribution.
The UnB-hosted Revista de Estudos e Pesquisas sobre as Americas allows generative AI for brainstorming and language improvement, but requires authors to clearly disclose any generative AI use with tool, version, use, and reason information in submission editor notes.
官方來源紀錄：3。
official_guidance 追蹤器檢查於 May 20, 2026, 1:50 PM
official_guidance 追蹤器檢查於 May 20, 2026, 1:50 PM
official_guidance 追蹤器檢查於 May 20, 2026, 1:50 PM
