Policy presence
Wake Forest University has 4 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Winston-Salem, United States
Wake Forest University
Record status
Review: Agent reviewed
Policy profile
Review: Machine candidate
AI disclosure
Wake Forest University has 1 source-backed public claim for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: required.
Coursework
Wake Forest University has 3 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: required.
Exams
Wake Forest University has 3 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: required.
Privacy and data entry
Wake Forest University has 2 source-backed public claims for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Academic integrity
Wake Forest University has 1 source-backed public claim for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Approved tools
Wake Forest University has 3 source-backed public claims for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Named AI services
Wake Forest University has 3 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Teaching guidance
Wake Forest University has 2 source-backed public claims for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Research guidance
No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.
Security and procurement
Wake Forest University has 1 source-backed public claim for security and procurement; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
AI tools
Evidence-backed claims
5 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Privacy
Wake Forest's administrative generative AI guidance says not to input confidential, non-public, or internal-use-only information into AI tools that are not approved for WFU institutional use.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: do_not_input_confidential_data_unapproved_ai
Original evidence
Evidence 1Do not input Confidential, non-public, and/or internal-use-only information when using AI tools that are not approved for WFU institutional use.
Localized display only
The administrative guidance warns against entering confidential or internal-use-only information into unapproved AI tools.
Procurement
Wake Forest's administrative generative AI guidance says AI tools should be routed through the university's standard software request review process before use, especially when university resources or data are involved.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: ai_tools_should_use_standard_software_review
Original evidence
Evidence 1AI tools should be routed through the University’s standard review process as part of an official software request before use, especially if they involve the use of University resources or University data.
Localized display only
Administrative AI tools should go through Wake Forest's standard software request review process before use.
Academic Integrity
Wake Forest's academic generative AI guidance says AI detector results may be included as evidence but are insufficient on their own for academic misconduct proof.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: ai_detector_results_insufficient_alone
Original evidence
Evidence 1Evidentiary standards for academic misconduct should not allow for AI detectors alone to constitute a sufficient standard of proof. GAI detector results may be included as evidence but are insufficient on their own.
Localized display only
AI detector results may be considered, but Wake Forest guidance says they are not enough alone.
Teaching
Wake Forest's academic generative AI guidance says course materials should communicate when and how generative AI tools may be used and acknowledged.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: course_ai_expectations_should_be_communicated
Original evidence
Evidence 1In order to substantiate cases of academic misconduct, instructional materials (such as the course syllabus, assignment prompts, and/or verbal instructions) need to include directions regarding the authorized use of GAI, including method(s) for disclosing or citing such use.
Localized display only
Course materials need directions on authorized generative AI use, including disclosure or citation methods.
Ai Tool Treatment
Wake Forest Information Systems identifies campus-licensed AI tools for students, faculty, and staff and says signing in with a WFU account provides enhanced data protections for queries.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: campus_licensed_ai_tools_with_wfu_account_data_protection
Original evidence
Evidence 1Campus-licensed AI Tools for students, faculty and staff. Sign in with your WFU account to ensure enhanced data protections are in place for all queries.
Localized display only
Information Systems lists campus-licensed AI tools and says WFU-account sign-in provides enhanced data protections.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Official sources
4 source attribution
Academic Integrity FAQ - Center for the Advancement of Teaching
cat.wfu.edu
Generative AI at Wake Forest - Information Systems
is.wfu.edu
Guidelines for Academic Use - AI at Wake Forest
ai.wfu.edu
Guidelines for Administrative Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence Tools - AI at Wake Forest
ai.wfu.edu