Policy presence
University of St Andrews has 5 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
St. Andrews, United Kingdom
University of St Andrews
University of St Andrews is listed as QS 2026 rank 113. University of St Andrews has 6 source-backed AI policy claim records from 4 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
Short answer
v1 public contract
University of St Andrews is listed as QS 2026 rank 113. University of St Andrews has 6 source-backed AI policy claim records from 4 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
Citation-ready summary
As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists University of St Andrews as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 14, 2026 and last changed on May 14, 2026. The record contains 6 source-backed claims, including 6 reviewed claims, from 4 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/university-of-st-andrews.json. The entity-level confidence is 96%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy signals in this record
- Evidence includes Privacy claims.
- Evidence includes Academic integrity claims.
- Evidence includes AI tool treatment claims.
- Evidence includes Procurement claims.
- Named AI services detected in public claims: Microsoft Copilot.
- Disclosure, acknowledgment, citation, or attribution language appears in the public claim text.
- Teaching, assessment, coursework, or syllabus-related language appears in the public claim text.
- Privacy, sensitive-data, or security language appears in the public claim text.
Review: Agent reviewed
This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.
This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy profile
Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.
Review: Machine candidate
Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.
Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.
AI disclosure
University of St Andrews has 2 source-backed public claims for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Coursework
University of St Andrews has 4 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: required.
Exams
University of St Andrews has 4 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: required.
Privacy and data entry
University of St Andrews has 2 source-backed public claims for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Academic integrity
University of St Andrews has 2 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: required.
Approved tools
University of St Andrews has 3 source-backed public claims for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: allowed.
Named AI services
University of St Andrews has 4 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Teaching guidance
No source-backed public claim about teaching guidance is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about instructor, classroom, assessment-design, or syllabus guidance.
Research guidance
No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.
Security and procurement
University of St Andrews has 1 source-backed public claim for security and procurement; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.
Evidence-backed claims
6 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Privacy
St Andrews GenAI information policy says University information classified as internal, confidential, or strictly confidential must not be input into publicly available generative AI tools.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: internal_confidential_strictly_confidential_information_not_for_public_genai_tools
Original evidence
Evidence 1internal, confidential, or strictly confidential ... must not be disclosed/input into publicly available Generative AI tools
Academic Integrity
St Andrews Good Academic Practice policy treats presenting AI output as a student's own work without acknowledgement as unauthorised use of AI, except where an assessment specifically permits or encourages such tools.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: unacknowledged_ai_output_as_own_work_is_unauthorised_use_except_permitted_assessments
Original evidence
Evidence 1presents the output of an AI technology ... as their own work without acknowledgment. This does not apply to assessments which specifically permit
Academic Integrity
St Andrews student guidance says students should not use generative AI for assessed work unless the module coordinator explicitly authorises it, and any AI use should be declared on an assessment coversheet.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: assessed_work_genai_requires_module_coordinator_authorisation_and_declaration
Original evidence
Evidence 1Can Students use AI to produce assessed work? ... unless authorised explicitly by the module co-ordinator. If AI has been used, this should be clearly declared on an assessment coversheet.
Ai Tool Treatment
St Andrews student guidance says Microsoft Copilot is the University's provided AI tool for staff and students, with Commercial Data Protection enabled.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: microsoft_copilot_university_provided_ai_tool_commercial_data_protection
Original evidence
Evidence 1The University's provided AI tool is Microsoft Copilot ... with 'Commercial Data Protection' services enabled.
Ai Tool Treatment
St Andrews staff guidance says Turnitin AI detection has not been switched on at the University because of concerns over accurate detection.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: turnitin_ai_detection_not_switched_on_due_to_accuracy_concerns
Original evidence
Evidence 1has not currently been switched on at the University of St Andrews due to concerns over accurate detection
Procurement
St Andrews GenAI information policy says selection and procurement of generative AI tools should follow existing University procurement policies and procedures.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: genai_tool_procurement_follows_existing_university_procurement_policies
Original evidence
Evidence 1The selection and procurement of Generative AI tools should follow existing University policies and procedures.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.
Official sources
4 source attribution
Generative AI - FAQs for students
st-andrews.ac.uk
Good academic practice
st-andrews.ac.uk
Good academic practice: Guidance for staff
st-andrews.ac.uk
Use of University personal data and other information with Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI)
st-andrews.ac.uk
Change log
Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.
View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.
Corrections and missing evidence
Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.
If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.