Rochester, United States

University of Rochester

Record status

Policy statusReviewed evidence-backed recordReview: Agent reviewedClaim coverage4 reviewedEvidence-backed claims4Reviewed4Candidate0Official sources4Source languageen-USPublic JSON/api/public/v1/universities/university-of-rochester.json

Policy profile

Coverage score100/100Coverage labelbroad public coverageReview: Machine candidateAnalysis confidence77%

AI disclosure

University of Rochester has 1 source-backed public claim for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: required.

RequiredMachine candidateConfidence77%Evidence1Sources1

Coursework

University of Rochester has 1 source-backed public claim for coursework; deterministic analysis status: restricted.

RestrictedMachine candidateConfidence77%Evidence1Sources1

Academic integrity

University of Rochester has 1 source-backed public claim for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: restricted.

RestrictedMachine candidateConfidence75%Evidence1Sources1

Approved tools

University of Rochester has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: restricted.

RestrictedMachine candidateConfidence78%Evidence1Sources1

Named AI services

University of Rochester has 1 source-backed public claim for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: restricted.

RestrictedMachine candidateConfidence78%Evidence1Sources1

Research guidance

University of Rochester has 1 source-backed public claim for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.

RecommendedMachine candidateConfidence77%Evidence1Sources1

Security and procurement

University of Rochester has 1 source-backed public claim for security and procurement; deterministic analysis status: restricted.

RestrictedMachine candidateConfidence78%Evidence1Sources1

AI tools

Derived tool records0

No tool-level evidence is published for this record yet. Broad AI tool mentions are not expanded into named tool conclusions.

Evidence-backed claims

4 reviewed evidence-backed public claim

Privacy

University of Rochester Provost guidance says non-public or sensitive University information should not be uploaded into external AI tools unless there is a university agreement with the vendor approved by an AI governance group.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%

Normalized value: external_ai_tools_sensitive_data_restricted

Original evidence

Evidence 1
non-public or sensitive University information should never be uploaded into external AI tools--whether free or paid--unless there is a university agreement with the vendor approved by one of the various AI governance groups.

Teaching

University of Rochester Provost guidance says instructors should create written course GenAI policies stating when students must, may, or cannot use GenAI and how use should be verified, disclosed, documented, and attributed.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence91%

Normalized value: provost_guidance_course_genai_policies

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Instructors should create and communicate student GenAI course policies. For each assignment, the policy should state when students must, may, or cannot use GenAI and how they should verify, disclose, document, and attribute any GenAI use.

Research

University of Rochester research guidance frames responsible GenAI use in research around data protection, verification, and transparency, including only considering low-risk data generally suitable for GenAI and using appropriate internal review for medium- or high-risk data.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%

Normalized value: research_genai_data_protection_verification_transparency

Original evidence

Evidence 1
As a general guide, only data classified as low risk by the University Data Security Classification Policy should be considered suitable for entry to GenAI.

Original evidence

Evidence 2
Three key duties of data protection, verification, and transparency frame appropriate use of GenAI in research.

Academic Integrity

The SAS/Hajim Academic Honesty Policy lists use of AI-generated material not allowed by the instructor as an example of plagiarism under that school-scoped policy.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence88%

Normalized value: sas_hajim_instructor_disallowed_ai_material_plagiarism_example

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Usage of material generated by AI tools (Grammarly, ChatGPT, DALL-E, translation software, or similar) that is not allowed by the instructor.

Candidate claims

0 machine or needs-review claim

Official sources

4 source attribution

Change log

Last checkedMay 15, 2026Last changedMay 15, 2026Open change log

Corrections

Back to universities