Policy presence
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia has 2 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Modena, Italy
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia has 4 source-backed AI policy claims from 1 official source attribution. Review state: agent reviewed; 4 reviewed claims. Last checked May 20, 2026.
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia AI policy short answer
v1 public contract
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia has 4 source-backed AI policy claims from 1 official source attribution, including 4 reviewed claims. The record review state is agent reviewed; original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, confidence, and public JSON are preserved for citation. Last checked May 20, 2026. Discovery context: University of Modena and Reggio Emilia is listed as QS 2026 rank 801-850.
Citation-ready summary
As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists University of Modena and Reggio Emilia as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 20, 2026 and last changed on May 20, 2026. The record contains 4 source-backed claims, including 4 reviewed claims, from 1 official source attribution. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/university-of-modena-and-reggio-emilia.json. The entity-level confidence is 90%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy signals in this record
- Evidence includes AI tool treatment claims.
- Evidence includes Privacy claims.
- Evidence includes Source status claims.
- Named AI services detected in public claims: ChatGPT.
- Disclosure, acknowledgment, citation, or attribution language appears in the public claim text.
- Privacy, sensitive-data, or security language appears in the public claim text.
Review: Agent reviewed
This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.
This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy profile
Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.
Review: Machine candidate
Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.
Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.
AI disclosure
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia has 1 source-backed public claim for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Coursework
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia has 2 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Exams
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia has 2 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Privacy and data entry
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia has 2 source-backed public claims for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Academic integrity
No source-backed public claim about academic-integrity treatment of AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about AI use under academic integrity, misconduct, dishonesty, plagiarism, or cheating rules.
Approved tools
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia has 2 source-backed public claims for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Named AI services
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia has 3 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Teaching guidance
No source-backed public claim about teaching guidance is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about instructor, classroom, assessment-design, or syllabus guidance.
Research guidance
No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.
Security and procurement
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.
Evidence-backed claims
4 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Ai Tool Treatment
Unimore stated that it had purchased ChatGPT Edu licenses under the CRUI-OpenAI agreement and that requested licenses would provide access to the 'Modena e Reggio Emilia EDU' workspace through institutional email.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: ChatGPT Edu workspace access
Original evidence
Evidence 1A breve verranno assegnate le licenze di ChatGPT Edu che l'Ateneo ha acquistato nell'ambito della convenzione CRUI-OpenAI per il primo lotto di Ottobre. Chi ha richiesto la licenza ricevera una email con un link per accettare la licenza ed entrare con l'indirizzo istituzionale nella forma nome.cognome@unimore.it nel Workspace "Modena e Reggio Emilia EDU" attivato per l'Ateneo su chatgpt.com
Localized display only
Unimore said it had purchased ChatGPT Edu licenses under the CRUI-OpenAI agreement and that requesters would access the 'Modena e Reggio Emilia EDU' workspace through an institutional email address.
Ai Tool Treatment
Pending university AI-use guidelines, Unimore recommended verifying sources, keeping human control by using AI only as assistance, requesting source citations in prompts, protecting sensitive data, and documenting AI use in proceedings.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: responsible AI-use recommendations
Original evidence
Evidence 1Nel frattempo, per un utilizzo responsabile ed efficace dei sistemi di AI, si raccomanda di - verificare sempre le fonti - mantenere il controllo umano usando l'AI solo come strumento di assistenza - strutturare correttamente le richieste chiedendo al sistema di AI la citazione delle fonti - proteggere i dati sensibili - documentare sempre l'utilizzo del sistemi di AI nei vari procedimenti
Localized display only
Pending guidelines, Unimore recommends verifying sources, keeping human control by using AI only as assistance, asking AI systems to cite sources, protecting sensitive data, and documenting AI use in proceedings.
Privacy
For ChatGPT Edu licenses, Unimore stated that inserted data would not be used to train models and that users remain owners of inputs and outputs.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: ChatGPT Edu data not used for model training; input and output ownership retained
Original evidence
Evidence 1Con le licenze ChatGPT Edu viene garantito che i dati inseriti non verranno usati per addestrare i modelli e che si rimane proprietari degli input e output delle interrogazioni (vd. https://openai.com/it-IT/enterprise-privacy/)
Localized display only
The communication says ChatGPT Edu licenses guarantee that entered data will not be used to train models and that users remain owners of query inputs and outputs.
Source Status
Unimore stated that university AI-use guidelines were being defined and framed the listed AI-use practices as interim recommendations for responsible and effective AI use.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: AI guidelines in progress; interim recommendations available
Original evidence
Evidence 1Sono in corso di definizione linee guida per l'utilizzo dell'AI in Ateneo. Nel frattempo, per un utilizzo responsabile ed efficace dei sistemi di AI, si raccomanda di
Localized display only
Unimore says AI-use guidelines for the university are being defined and that, in the meantime, it recommends practices for responsible and effective AI use.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.
Official sources
1 source attribution
Licenze ChatGPT
in.unimore.it
Change log
Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.
View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.
Corrections and missing evidence
Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.
If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.