Policy presence
University of Minnesota (System) has 5 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Minneapolis, United States
University of Minnesota (System) has 5 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
University of Minnesota (System) has 1 source-backed public claim for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
University of Minnesota (System) has 4 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
University of Minnesota (System) has 3 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
University of Minnesota (System) has 2 source-backed public claims for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: allowed.
University of Minnesota (System) has 2 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
University of Minnesota (System) has 2 source-backed public claims for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: required.
University of Minnesota (System) has 1 source-backed public claim for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: allowed.
University of Minnesota (System) has 4 source-backed public claims for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
University of Minnesota (System) has 1 source-backed public claim for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
University of Minnesota (System) has 1 source-backed public claim for security and procurement; deterministic analysis status: required.
No tool-level evidence is published for this record yet. Broad AI tool mentions are not expanded into named tool conclusions.
7 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Academic Integrity
Normalized value: course_ai_use_requires_instructor_authorization
Original evidence
Evidence 1Instructors at the University may allow or prohibit the use of Generative AI (GenAI) tools in their courses and are strongly encouraged to include a clear syllabus statement outlining their expectations.
Localized display only
The same page says coursework use of generative AI requires written instructor permission and may not be used except as explicitly authorized.
Privacy
Normalized value: licensed_ai_data_use_limits
Original evidence
Evidence 1Safeguarding data means only uploading allowed University data into appropriately licensed tools. The table below outlines the data types you can and can't add to AI tools.
Security Review
Normalized value: human_review_required_for_ai_outputs_and_code
Original evidence
Evidence 1AI tools can generate incomplete or biased responses, so any output should be closely reviewed and verified by a human. AI-generated code should not be used for institutional IT systems and services unless it is reviewed by a technologist with appropriate skills.
Academic Integrity
Normalized value: student_ai_citation_and_acknowledgement
Original evidence
Evidence 1Each class or project might have different rules or expectations on AI use. Each instructor gets to decide how they are using or not using these tools in their classes.
Localized display only
The page also tells students to keep track of GenAI use and cite AI-generated text, images, or other media when used.
Teaching
Normalized value: instructor_course_specific_ai_guidance
Original evidence
Evidence 1Faculty are encouraged to address guidelines for generative AI tools early in the semester both in the syllabus and in person. Revisiting the topic during new assignments can also be helpful.
Localized display only
The FAQ adds that one instructor's permission is specific to that course and does not extend to other courses or override existing University policies.
Other
Normalized value: marketing_communications_ai_review_privacy
Original evidence
Evidence 1Review, verify, and modify all Generative AI-produced content. AI output is based on the data it’s trained on and the information you provide, filling gaps—even if incorrect—as it sees fit.
Localized display only
The guidance is scoped to marketing and communications and also says AI use should comply with University data privacy and information security policies.
Research
Normalized value: researcher_agency_ai_policy_awareness
Original evidence
Evidence 1Faculty and researchers must understand the AI policies of the granting and research agencies they work with.
0 machine or needs-review claim
7 source attribution
it.umn.edu
provost.umn.edu
libguides.umn.edu
it.umn.edu
umarcomm.umn.edu
teachingsupport.umn.edu
libguides.umn.edu