Policy presence
University of Guelph has 2 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Guelph, Canada
University of Guelph has 2 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
No source-backed public claim about AI disclosure or acknowledgement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about disclosing, acknowledging, citing, or declaring AI use.
University of Guelph has 5 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
University of Guelph has 4 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: conditionally_allowed.
University of Guelph has 2 source-backed public claims for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
University of Guelph has 2 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: conditionally_allowed.
University of Guelph has 3 source-backed public claims for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
University of Guelph has 2 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
University of Guelph has 5 source-backed public claims for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
No tool-level evidence is published for this record yet. Broad AI tool mentions are not expanded into named tool conclusions.
6 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Academic Integrity
Normalized value: unauthorized_ai_submission_academic_misconduct
Original evidence
Evidence 1Submission of materials completed by AI, without permission of the instructor, constitutes an offence under the University’s academic misconduct policies, either as a form of plagiarism or the use of unauthorized aids.
Ai Tool Treatment
Normalized value: course_instructor_determines_acceptable_ai_use
Original evidence
Evidence 1Acceptable use of AI should be determined by the course instructor and may vary across disciplines, programs and types of assessments.
Academic Integrity
Normalized value: genai_detection_software_not_currently_approved
Original evidence
Evidence 1Generative AI plagiarism detection software is not currently approved for use at UofG. This software will continue to be reviewed and may be available in the future.
Privacy
Normalized value: sensitive_university_data_and_pii_restricted_in_public_or_unapproved_ai_tools
Original evidence
Evidence 1Internal (S2), Confidential (S3) and Restricted (S4) University data should never be entered into a public AI tool (e.g., ChatGPT), such as including sensitive information in a generative AI prompt.
Source Status
Normalized value: public_official_genai_teaching_guidance_available
Original evidence
Evidence 1The following guidance and resources are available for University of Guelph faculty, instructors, staff, and teaching assistants as they navigate the impact of Generative AI on teaching and learning.
Teaching
Normalized value: students_check_syllabus_or_instructor_before_coursework_genai_use
Original evidence
Evidence 1Always check the course syllabus or check with your instructor before using gen AI in for your course work. At the U of G acceptable use of AI is determined by the course instructor and may vary across disciplines, programs, and types of assessments.
0 machine or needs-review claim
5 source attribution
uoguelph.ca
ithelp.uoguelph.ca
guides.lib.uoguelph.ca
otl.uoguelph.ca
news.uoguelph.ca