Groningen, Netherlands

University of Groningen

Record status

Policy statusReviewed evidence-backed recordReview: Agent reviewedClaim coverage6 reviewedEvidence-backed claims6Reviewed6Candidate0Official sources5Source languageenPublic JSON/api/public/v1/universities/university-of-groningen.json

Policy profile

Coverage score100/100Coverage labelbroad public coverageReview: Machine candidateAnalysis confidence81%

AI disclosure

University of Groningen has 1 source-backed public claim for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: required.

RequiredMachine candidateConfidence82%Evidence1Sources1

Academic integrity

University of Groningen has 1 source-backed public claim for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: conditionally_allowed.

Conditionally AllowedMachine candidateConfidence81%Evidence1Sources1

Teaching guidance

University of Groningen has 1 source-backed public claim for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.

RecommendedMachine candidateConfidence82%Evidence1Sources1

Research guidance

University of Groningen has 1 source-backed public claim for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.

RecommendedMachine candidateConfidence79%Evidence1Sources1

Security and procurement

University of Groningen has 1 source-backed public claim for security and procurement; deterministic analysis status: restricted.

RestrictedMachine candidateConfidence80%Evidence1Sources1

AI tools

Derived tool records0

No tool-level evidence is published for this record yet. Broad AI tool mentions are not expanded into named tool conclusions.

Evidence-backed claims

6 reviewed evidence-backed public claim

Privacy

University of Groningen's AI policy and regulations page tells UG users not to share personal or organizational details with AI systems, to keep human intervention for decisions about other people, and to follow GDPR and related laws.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence96%

Normalized value: do not share personal or organizational details; keep human intervention; follow GDPR

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Do not share any personal or organizational details while using AI systems. Do not let AI make decisions about other people without human intervention.

Localized display only

UG's AI policy and regulations page warns against sharing personal or organizational details and against automated decisions about other people.

Teaching

University of Groningen's teaching AI policy says AI tools may be used as aids, GenAI use beyond that must be mentioned, and faculties or courses may add extra rules.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence96%

Normalized value: AI aids allowed; GenAI use must be cited; extra faculty/course rules may apply

Original evidence

Evidence 1
AI tools may be used as aids. When GenAI functionalities are used, this should always be mentioned/referred to. Additional rules may apply at the level of your faculty, degree programme, and course unit.

Localized display only

UG allows AI tools as aids, requires GenAI use to be mentioned, and notes that extra faculty or course rules may apply.

Academic Integrity

UG guidance says unauthorized student AI use that hinders assessment can be fraud, and AI detection scores do not prove cheating.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%

Normalized value: unauthorized student AI use can be fraud; detection scores are not proof

Original evidence

Evidence 1
The unauthorized use of AI tools by students that hinders the assessment of a learning goal can be considered fraud and a breach of academic integrity. Cheating scores that are generated by AI detection tools may not be used to prove that a student has cheated.

Localized display only

UG guidance treats unauthorized student AI use that harms assessment as possible fraud and rejects AI-detection scores as proof.

Ai Tool Treatment

UG presents Le Chat as a secure and reliable AI assistant and says the pilot is meant to help people use AI in a safe experimental environment.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%

Normalized value: Le Chat is UG secure AI assistant pilot

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Le Chat (Mistral AI) is a secure and reliable AI assistant for the UG that can help with daily tasks. The pilot offers the opportunity to familiarize yourself with AI within a safe and experimental environment.

Localized display only

UG describes Le Chat as a secure, reliable assistant and frames the rollout as a pilot in a safe experimental setting.

Privacy

UG says the Le Chat Enterprise licence is only active on @rug.nl accounts, other external AI tools may only process public information, and medium-confidentiality use requires disabling several tools.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%

Normalized value: Le Chat enterprise only on @rug.nl; external tools public info only; medium confidentiality needs tool limits

Original evidence

Evidence 1
This licence is only active on the @rug.nl account. Other External AI tools may only be used for processing public information. Be cautious at medium confidentiality level: Mistral can be used, provided that code interpreter, image generation, web search, and Flash Answers are disabled.

Localized display only

UG says the Le Chat enterprise licence is tied to @rug.nl accounts and that other external AI tools are limited to public information.

Research

UG says there are no specific AI guidelines for research, but the general AI guidelines still apply.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%

Normalized value: no specific research guidelines; general guidelines apply

Original evidence

Evidence 1
There are no specific guidelines for AI in research. Of course, the general guidelines do apply.

Localized display only

UG says it has no specific AI research guidance, but the general AI guidelines still apply.

Candidate claims

0 machine or needs-review claim

Official sources

5 source attribution

Change log

Last checkedMay 15, 2026Last changedMay 15, 2026Open change log

Corrections

Back to universities