Policy presence
University of Groningen has 3 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Groningen, Netherlands
University of Groningen has 3 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
University of Groningen has 1 source-backed public claim for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: required.
University of Groningen has 3 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: required.
University of Groningen has 3 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: required.
University of Groningen has 2 source-backed public claims for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
University of Groningen has 1 source-backed public claim for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: conditionally_allowed.
University of Groningen has 2 source-backed public claims for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
University of Groningen has 3 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
University of Groningen has 1 source-backed public claim for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
University of Groningen has 1 source-backed public claim for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
University of Groningen has 1 source-backed public claim for security and procurement; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
No tool-level evidence is published for this record yet. Broad AI tool mentions are not expanded into named tool conclusions.
6 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Privacy
Normalized value: do not share personal or organizational details; keep human intervention; follow GDPR
Original evidence
Evidence 1Do not share any personal or organizational details while using AI systems. Do not let AI make decisions about other people without human intervention.
Localized display only
UG's AI policy and regulations page warns against sharing personal or organizational details and against automated decisions about other people.
Teaching
Normalized value: AI aids allowed; GenAI use must be cited; extra faculty/course rules may apply
Original evidence
Evidence 1AI tools may be used as aids. When GenAI functionalities are used, this should always be mentioned/referred to. Additional rules may apply at the level of your faculty, degree programme, and course unit.
Localized display only
UG allows AI tools as aids, requires GenAI use to be mentioned, and notes that extra faculty or course rules may apply.
Academic Integrity
Normalized value: unauthorized student AI use can be fraud; detection scores are not proof
Original evidence
Evidence 1The unauthorized use of AI tools by students that hinders the assessment of a learning goal can be considered fraud and a breach of academic integrity. Cheating scores that are generated by AI detection tools may not be used to prove that a student has cheated.
Localized display only
UG guidance treats unauthorized student AI use that harms assessment as possible fraud and rejects AI-detection scores as proof.
Ai Tool Treatment
Normalized value: Le Chat is UG secure AI assistant pilot
Original evidence
Evidence 1Le Chat (Mistral AI) is a secure and reliable AI assistant for the UG that can help with daily tasks. The pilot offers the opportunity to familiarize yourself with AI within a safe and experimental environment.
Localized display only
UG describes Le Chat as a secure, reliable assistant and frames the rollout as a pilot in a safe experimental setting.
Privacy
Normalized value: Le Chat enterprise only on @rug.nl; external tools public info only; medium confidentiality needs tool limits
Original evidence
Evidence 1This licence is only active on the @rug.nl account. Other External AI tools may only be used for processing public information. Be cautious at medium confidentiality level: Mistral can be used, provided that code interpreter, image generation, web search, and Flash Answers are disabled.
Localized display only
UG says the Le Chat enterprise licence is tied to @rug.nl accounts and that other external AI tools are limited to public information.
Research
Normalized value: no specific research guidelines; general guidelines apply
Original evidence
Evidence 1There are no specific guidelines for AI in research. Of course, the general guidelines do apply.
Localized display only
UG says it has no specific AI research guidance, but the general AI guidelines still apply.
0 machine or needs-review claim
5 source attribution
rug.nl
edusupport.rug.nl
rug.nl
rug.nl
rug.nl