University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
Language
ENZHFRPLESNLMSJAKOPTARRUDEITCSTRFISVDANBHULTIDVITHFAHEHIURBNUKELZH-HANT

Exeter, United Kingdom Last checked

University of Exeter

Independent · Open access · Not an official university page

What would you like to check?

Search universities
Can I use AI for my coursework?Conditional in this scopeDo I need to disclose AI use?Required in this scopeCan I upload sensitive data?Restrictions in this scopeWhich tools can I access?Conditional in this scope
Use in ChatGPT ↗Before you submitAdvice and precautionsRecord updates ↓

Explore the current record by topic

Coursework

Conditional in this scope

The 2026/27 guidance uses four assessment tiers: AI-integrated, AI-assisted, AI-minimal and AI-prohibited. Follow the tier and permitted purposes in your assessment brief.

Official source ↗

Exams

Evidence gap or scope limits

The four-tier framework does not establish blanket AI permission in an exam. Check the tier and instructions for the actual assessment.

Official source ↗

Disclosure

Required in this scope

For AI-integrated and AI-assisted assessments, include GenAI prompts and, where possible, links to outputs in the submission. Record direct and indirect use; reference direct use.

Official source ↗

Privacy and data

Restrictions in this scope

Use the university account and match the tool’s approved information-classification level to the information you enter or upload.

Official source ↗

Institutional tools

Conditional in this scope

The current catalogue identifies Amazon Quick as the primary AI platform available to all students, and lists Copilot Chat as a companion tool.

Official source ↗

Research and publication

Required in this scope

Since 1 August 2024, PGR students must include an AI-use statement in the upgrade portfolio and final thesis, including whether and how AI was used. Research use requires critical scrutiny and oversight.

Official source ↗
More reviewed record topics

Academic integrity

Evidence gap or scope limits

Academic conduct is now in the standalone 2026/27 Academic Conduct and Practice Handbook, formerly Chapter 12. Complete investigation, sanction and appeal details were not accepted in this review.

Official source ↗

Teaching guidance

Required in this scope

Apply the assessment’s declared tier and checklist; AI-minimal does not allow ChatGPT or Copilot content generation. Keep the supported assistive-technology exceptions in view.

Official source ↗

Security and procurement

Restrictions in this scope

Choose tools from the AI catalogue and check their permitted information levels. University licensing does not remove tool-specific security conditions.

Official source ↗

Before you submit

Do

  • In integrated or assisted assessments, include prompts and, where possible, output links in your submission.
    Requirement in this scope

Don’t

  • Do not use ChatGPT or Copilot under AI-minimal assessment conditions.
    Requirement in this scope
AI use questioned?Investigation, possible outcomes and appeal

AI use questioned?

University of Exeter

Use the source-specific audience, assessment and publication limits below. Institution-wide policy review remains PARTIAL.

Investigation & response

The current evidence does not include a verified specific procedure or deadline. Check the applicable university rules.

Possible outcomes

The current evidence does not include a verified specific procedure or deadline. Check the applicable university rules.

Review & appeal

The current evidence does not include a verified specific procedure or deadline. Check the applicable university rules.

AI tools & access

  • Microsoft Copilot ChatInstitutional access / licenceConditions apply

    Use the named product and university account; tool access is separate from assessment permission. Specialist tools, information levels and account conditions differ. The current catalogue identifies Amazon Quick as the primary AI platform available to all students, and lists Copilot Chat as a companion tool.

  • Amazon QuickInstitutional access / licenceConditions apply

    Use the named product and university account; tool access is separate from assessment permission. Specialist tools, information levels and account conditions differ. The current catalogue identifies Amazon Quick as the primary AI platform available to all students, and lists Copilot Chat as a companion tool.

Record updatesLast 90 days · Recorded updates: 1

Updates to this site's reviewed record, not confirmation that the university changed its policy.

  1. Page update

    Other records · Page update

    View revision

    Loading revision…

Reviewed claims

6

Historical and pending public Claims (2)

These original public records and sources remain traceable. They are excluded from current topics, FAQ, submission and Analysis conclusions and do not establish current permission.

cl-university-of-exeter-microsoft-copilot-522 · excluded_pending_review

Original public Claim retained in its source-specific scope; institution audit remains PARTIAL.

Excluded from current conclusions pending source, temporal or normative review; original text and evidence retained.

Record history

claim-exeter-002 · excluded_pending_review

Original public Claim retained in its source-specific scope; institution audit remains PARTIAL.

Excluded from current conclusions pending source, temporal or normative review; original text and evidence retained.

Record history

Official sources

5 official URLs; 6 source attributions and their captured versions retained.

Enabling AI at Exeter

www.exeter.ac.uk

University official source

exeter.ac.uk

Hash and captured version

Enabling AI at Exeter · 2026-07-16T02:01:43.896Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

438fec11ac56885c14c8db429945cd0a6e1e39cc83b9ae2404b6b0461ad92ac6

Enabling AI at Exeter | Strategies | University of Exeter · 2026-05-14T17:10:00.000Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

8c4c62ee2ab01cb4fa96c7207c36ec93c9a50ba8ea4bbdca9e720a450b800e74

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) use in assessments - Referencing - LibGuides at University of Exeter

libguides.exeter.ac.uk

University official source

libguides.exeter.ac.uk

Hash and captured version

Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) use in assessments - Referencing - LibGuides at University of Exeter · 2026-05-14T17:10:30.000Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

660a29b5aa3ce9afd86e6c4a94f8dd719ff79fcba3dd1acd95f5f6c36ee02d55

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Recording and referencing GenAI - Referencing - LibGuides at University of Exeter

libguides.exeter.ac.uk

University official source

libguides.exeter.ac.uk

Hash and captured version

Recording and referencing GenAI - Referencing - LibGuides at University of Exeter · 2026-05-14T17:11:00.000Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

3311252ded697e3aca04e487178167ceb48fe28ca337e7ae2c9fb18a1858f8a2

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Research training and skills | Doctoral College | University of Exeter

www.exeter.ac.uk

University official source

exeter.ac.uk

Hash and captured version

Research training and skills | Doctoral College | University of Exeter · 2026-05-14T17:12:00.000Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

617da000c045498aeac49c1b4d149e75fe0fcf0992970757d60eb66a05e84d3e

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Responsible use of AI in research

www.exeter.ac.uk

University official source

exeter.ac.uk

Hash and captured version

Responsible use of AI in research · 2026-05-14T17:11:30.000Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

3895092c8a628da9bc5f88dfcbfd6d36c516fc4c729eca8a9169a1401ec6fee8

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗
Record information, JSON & citation

Review layers: claim review applies to the claims only. Analysis is a separate machine-generated summary awaiting review. Coverage scores do not establish complete policy knowledge.

Claim review state
agent_reviewed
Analysis review state
machine_candidate
Record revision
v6-reading-rankings-ten-20261027
Dataset release
public-release-20260924-002
Correction published
Student snapshot
Not published
Current reviewed JSON · All record history

Published V6 presentation; JSON and MCP retain the existing public record. Supplementary quotations and scope notes remain pending review. Local candidate corrections, tools and student summaries are not approved for publication. Institution-wide audit remains PARTIAL.

  • Institution-wide semantic audit remains PARTIAL. Private historical objects and every new requirement are not automatically accepted by public-Claim review.
  • New evidence retains original bytes where obtained; other items are reviewer excerpts or historical snapshots and do not establish full original documents.
  • Unchanged public APIs, snapshots, MCP, history and tool records do not adopt this local candidate.
        Current reviewed JSON
        Questions students ask

        Questions students ask

        Can I use AI for my coursework?

        The 2026/27 guidance uses four assessment tiers: AI-integrated, AI-assisted, AI-minimal and AI-prohibited. Follow the tier and permitted purposes in your assessment brief.

        View evidence →
        Do I need to disclose AI use?

        For AI-integrated and AI-assisted assessments, include GenAI prompts and, where possible, links to outputs in the submission. Record direct and indirect use; reference direct use.

        View evidence →
        Can I upload sensitive data?

        Use the university account and match the tool’s approved information-classification level to the information you enter or upload.

        View evidence →
        Which tools can I access?

        The current catalogue identifies Amazon Quick as the primary AI platform available to all students, and lists Copilot Chat as a companion tool.

        View evidence →
        What are the examination rules?

        The four-tier framework does not establish blanket AI permission in an exam. Check the tier and instructions for the actual assessment.

        View evidence →
        What rules apply to research and publication?

        Since 1 August 2024, PGR students must include an AI-use statement in the upgrade portfolio and final thesis, including whether and how AI was used. Research use requires critical scrutiny and oversight.

        View evidence →
        What counts as academic misconduct?

        Academic conduct is now in the standalone 2026/27 Academic Conduct and Practice Handbook, formerly Chapter 12. Complete investigation, sanction and appeal details were not accepted in this review.

        View evidence →
        What guidance applies to teaching?

        Apply the assessment’s declared tier and checklist; AI-minimal does not allow ChatGPT or Copilot content generation. Keep the supported assistive-technology exceptions in view.

        View evidence →
        What security and procurement requirements apply?

        Choose tools from the AI catalogue and check their permitted information levels. University licensing does not remove tool-specific security conditions.

        View evidence →
        When was this record checked?

        Record checked:

        Record version →
        Which official sources support these rules?Official source →
        Where can I read the full evidence?

        6 · Full policy evidence

        Full policy evidence →
        University of Exeter AI Policy