Malang, Indonesia

Universitas Brawijaya

Last checkedMay 18, 2026Last changedMay 18, 2026Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%

Public JSON Change log Monthly report Citation rules Dataset access Analysis JSON Submit correction

Policy statusReviewed evidence-backed recordReview: Agent reviewedClaim coverage3 reviewedEvidence-backed claims3Reviewed3Candidate0Official sources2Source languageen, idPublic JSON/api/public/v1/universities/universitas-brawijaya.json

Coverage score75/100Coverage labelbroad public coverageReview: Machine candidateAnalysis confidence73%

Policy presence

Universitas Brawijaya has 3 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.

UnclearMachine candidateConfidence75%Evidence3Sources2

Claim claim-ub-jitecs-reviewer-genai-ban-20260518 Claim claim-ub-jitecs-author-genai-disclosure-20260518 Claim claim-ub-library-ai-policy-guidance-20260518

AI disclosure

Universitas Brawijaya has 1 source-backed public claim for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: recommended.

RecommendedMachine candidateConfidence77%Evidence1Sources1

Claim claim-ub-jitecs-author-genai-disclosure-20260518

Coursework

No source-backed public claim about coursework AI use is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about coursework, assignments, or syllabus-level AI use.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Exams

Universitas Brawijaya has 1 source-backed public claim for exams; deterministic analysis status: recommended.

RecommendedMachine candidateConfidence70%Evidence1Sources1

Claim claim-ub-library-ai-policy-guidance-20260518

Privacy and data entry

No source-backed public claim about privacy or data-entry restrictions is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about personal, confidential, sensitive, regulated, or student data entry into AI tools.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Academic integrity

Universitas Brawijaya has 1 source-backed public claim for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: recommended.

RecommendedMachine candidateConfidence70%Evidence1Sources1

Claim claim-ub-library-ai-policy-guidance-20260518

Approved tools

Universitas Brawijaya has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: recommended.

RecommendedMachine candidateConfidence70%Evidence1Sources1

Claim claim-ub-library-ai-policy-guidance-20260518

Named AI services

No source-backed public claim naming a specific AI service is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence naming a specific AI service.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Teaching guidance

Universitas Brawijaya has 1 source-backed public claim for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.

RecommendedMachine candidateConfidence70%Evidence1Sources1

Claim claim-ub-library-ai-policy-guidance-20260518

Research guidance

Universitas Brawijaya has 2 source-backed public claims for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: restricted.

RestrictedMachine candidateConfidence77%Evidence2Sources1

Claim claim-ub-jitecs-reviewer-genai-ban-20260518 Claim claim-ub-jitecs-author-genai-disclosure-20260518

Security and procurement

No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Derived tool records0

No tool-level evidence is published for this record yet. Broad AI tool mentions are not expanded into named tool conclusions.

Evidence-backed claims

3 reviewed evidence-backed public claim

Normalized value: jitecs_reviewers_must_not_use_genai_for_peer_review

Last checked: May 18, 2026
Last changed: May 18, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1

Reviewers must not use Generative AI tools for any part of the peer-review process ... Reviewers may not upload, quote, or share manuscripts with any AI system or external entity.
Source: GenAI Policy | Journal of Information Technology and Computer Science

Source language: English (en)
Snapshot hash: cd7a4ab4cab667f99b8ded36b9d43f7917bb5f75fbd3c42571c1b6d81533b588
Retrieved: May 18, 2026
Evidence locator: Policy for Reviewers, sections 2.1 and 2.2

Normalized value: jitecs_authors_may_use_genai_for_language_assistance_with_disclosure

Last checked: May 18, 2026
Last changed: May 18, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1

Authors are allowed to use GenAI for the following purposes: Language and Writing Assistance ... Drafting or refining sections of text with author oversight. All GenAI usage must be disclosed in the manuscript.
Source: GenAI Policy | Journal of Information Technology and Computer Science

Source language: English (en)
Snapshot hash: cd7a4ab4cab667f99b8ded36b9d43f7917bb5f75fbd3c42571c1b6d81533b588
Retrieved: May 18, 2026
Evidence locator: Policy for Authors

Normalized value: library_article_recommends_clear_ai_use_policies

Last checked: May 18, 2026
Last changed: May 18, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1

Setiap institusi pendidikan perlu mengembangkan kebijakan eksplisit mengenai penggunaan AI. Ini mencakup: Batas penggunaan alat AI dalam tugas dan ujian; Panduan untuk dosen dalam menilai keaslian karya; Sanksi terhadap pelanggaran etika akademik yang melibatkan AI.
Source: Etika dan Potensi AI dalam Dunia Akademik

Localized display only

Each educational institution needs explicit AI-use policies, including limits for AI tools in assignments and exams, guidance for assessing originality, and sanctions for academic-ethics violations involving AI.

Source language: id
Snapshot hash: 79092d82eb41e3f5c7600ecda6c130ae973bea2e4fa0a85d21dd9944e4289b87
Retrieved: May 18, 2026
Evidence locator: III. Strategi dan Rekomendasi Penggunaan AI secara Etis, item 2

Candidate claims

0 machine or needs-review claim

Official sources

2 source attribution

Etika dan Potensi AI dalam Dunia Akademik

lib.ub.ac.id

Source URL: https://lib.ub.ac.id/featured/etika-dan-potensi-ai-dalam-dunia-akademik/
Snapshot hash: 79092d82eb41e3f5c7600ecda6c130ae973bea2e4fa0a85d21dd9944e4289b87

GenAI Policy | Journal of Information Technology and Computer Science

jitecs.ub.ac.id

Source URL: https://jitecs.ub.ac.id/index.php/jitecs/GenAIPolicy
Snapshot hash: cd7a4ab4cab667f99b8ded36b9d43f7917bb5f75fbd3c42571c1b6d81533b588

Last checkedMay 18, 2026Last changedMay 18, 2026Open change log

Open contribution paths Review workflow

Back to universities

Universitas Brawijaya

Record status

Policy profile

Policy presence

AI disclosure

Coursework

Exams

Privacy and data entry

Academic integrity

Approved tools

Named AI services

Teaching guidance

Research guidance

Security and procurement

AI tools

Evidence-backed claims

The UB-hosted JITeCS GenAI policy says reviewers must not use generative AI tools for any part of the peer-review process and must not share manuscripts with AI systems.

The UB-hosted JITeCS GenAI policy permits authors to use generative AI for language and writing assistance with author oversight, while requiring disclosure of GenAI use in the manuscript.

A UB Library article recommends clear institutional AI-use policies, including limits for AI tools in assignments and exams, guidance for assessing originality, and sanctions for academic-ethics violations involving AI.

Candidate claims

Official sources

Etika dan Potensi AI dalam Dunia Akademik

GenAI Policy | Journal of Information Technology and Computer Science

Change log

Corrections