Tulane University

It is important to note that the major questions about the use of AI by our students are already covered in our academic integrity policies. Transparency and Accountability Using AI, especially externally sourced models, can raise concerns about accuracy, potential biases, and privacy. Prior to employing such tools, students, faculty and staff should consult with the necessary bodies to ensure safe and appropriate usage. Protect Confidential Data All members of Tulane University have a responsibility to protect university data from unauthorized access or disclosure. Consistent with Tulane’s data governance, data management, and data classification policies, data classified as Level 2- Internal, Level 3-Confidential Data, or Level 4- Restricted should not be entered into publicly available generative AI tools. Information shared with generative AI tools using default settings is not private and could result in unauthorized access or disclosure of university proprietary, confidential or restricted data. Review of AI Tools Appropriate privacy and security considerations must be applied to all technology solutions used by Tulane University. Any procured generative AI tools or systems utilizing generative AI tools require a security and risk review by the Tulane Information Security Office. Questions Around AI If you have questions about AI technology, assessing appropriate data classification levels, or the review process, please contact ciso@tulane.edu. Please refer to university Data Policies for additional information: Data Classification Data Governance Exploring AI's Educational Potential: An Approach for Faculty and Instructors Promote Exploration: Rather than restricting AI, faculty are encouraged to explore its potential. Experimenting with AI can help identify which projects can be effectively handled and which cannot. Strategies include requiring students to incorporate personal experiences, cite sources accurately, or compare diverse ideas. Engage the Community: Everyone – from students and faculty to staff – should actively engage as we integrate AI into our educational and administrative processes. Foster Transparency: Each instructor has the option of putting in place guidelines that make the most sense for their specific course or project, but instructions must be clear and precise. Should the use of AI be permitted, students should be encouraged to describe how AI tools were used.

Collected: 2026-10-08 · 50–65
SHA-256: c571f442de1332b91dabe456aac1c779d780e275471e86449c1a2115f9c566ea

Anyone can report academic misconduct or alleged violations of the Code of Academic Conduct. We prefer that the person who witnessed or experienced the issue submit the report whenever possible, and we will communicate with the instructor of record once the report is received. Reports may be submitted anonymously; however, there is no investigation of an anonymous report without evidence. Named reporters may ask for confidentiality but are needed for initial follow-up. Instructors of record should submit reports in a timely manner — at the time of grading or shortly after witnessing an issue. Giving the student repeated warnings about academic misconduct is not in the spirit of the Code of Academic Conduct. Waiting until the end of the term is not recommended. However, if the incident occurs within 14 days of grades being due, you should issue an “I” or incomplete final grade for the student(s) involved. Accused of Academic Misconduct Students are contacted once a report is received and the initial review yields charges for possible violations of the Code of Academic Conduct. If someone accuses you of academic misconduct, you have the right to have the NTC Honor Board decide your case. If an instructor refuses to submit a report and issues a grade impact, you may have grounds for a grade appeal. All students will have a processing or pre-hearing meeting to discuss the next steps and what to expect in a hearing. These meetings are informational and not adversarial in any way; no resolutions are made in meetings. Students must represent themselves in this process and may not have parents, attorneys or others contact the Honor Board on their behalf. NTC Honor Board Reports of alleged violations of the Code of Academic Conduct are reviewed by the Newcomb-Tulane College Honor Board. The board is composed of a select group of students and faculty who consider evidence, determine responsibility and recommend sanctions for violations as appropriate. The Dean of Newcomb-Tulane College is the authority of the Code and has designated the senior associate dean of academic affairs with general oversight of the Honor Board process. Hearings are chaired by trained student leaders, and panels also include faculty members who receive annual training to evaluate academic misconduct. The faculty chair of the Honor Board serves as the chair of the Committee on Academic Integrity within NTC, in addition to the selection and training of Honor Board members.

Collected: 2026-10-08 · 94–101
SHA-256: dd8b4d4219b33e7f20cfc10bf702c2d3cf43290c34a83b54b7ae7e00950e8ff3

What is a hearing waiver? Students who have no prior violations may be offered the opportunity to accept responsibility and waive a hearing. Information on sanctions for first violations is listed in the letter you receive. Students may not barter sanctions if they wish to waive a hearing. Can a person dismiss my case? There is not a single adjudicator or person who will hear your case. After the initial review and issuing of charges, students must either have a hearing or submit a hearing waiver accepting responsibility (first violations only). How can I get an advisor for my case? A list of NTC Honor Board Advisors can also be provided to you if you wish to consult a faculty member outside of the Honor Board for advice. While advisors are permitted, they may not speak for you or participate in meetings with our office. You may also consult a staff or faculty member of your choice; however, that person will not have training in the Honor Board process. Will I be suspended or expelled? While a full list of sanctions is available in the Code of Academic Conduct, you should ask about the specific consequences in your case during the process or pre-hearing meeting. Students who have a prior violation are typically suspended for further violations. Students with egregious cheating, fabrication and false information are at risk of expulsion. Can I call witnesses for my hearing? Yes. If you know that another person has firsthand knowledge of the issue or incident, you may call them to share information and answer questions in a hearing. The reporter may be called as well, and any other students involved may be called to participate in a hearing or provide information to the Honor Board. No character witnesses or letters of support may be provided. Can I submit evidence for my case? If you have an upcoming hearing, you will be provided with an online form to add evidence for your case. You will be provided the evidence attached to letters from our office and will know what information is available to the Honor Board in advance of your hearing. How can you prove I did something wrong? The Honor Board uses the preponderance standard to weigh information and will determine if it is more likely than not that you violated the Code of Academic Conduct. No one needs to prove something beyond a reasonable doubt. Will this go on my permanent record? This case will be a part of your academic record at Tulane and may be shared with others as you release your records (such as in a Dean’s Certification). As outlined in the Code of Academic Conduct on page 12, records of a responsible finding in academic misconduct cases are maintained internally for seven years from the incident date. Suspension, expulsion and degree revocation are noted on the transcript indefinitely. How do I appeal? The reasons for the appeal and how it will be reviewed are outlined in the Code of Academic Conduct. Students may appeal the decision of a hearing panel; however, if you waive a hearing, you are also waiving the right to appeal.

Collected: 2026-10-08 · 105–113
SHA-256: dd8b4d4219b33e7f20cfc10bf702c2d3cf43290c34a83b54b7ae7e00950e8ff3

a. Dissatisfaction with the results of a hearing is not itself a valid basis for appeal. Appeals are also not an occasion to engage in contempt of the process, administrators, or students who participated in Code process. A respondent may appeal the decision on the grounds of: 1. Procedural error is defined as material deviation from procedures that substantially impacted determinations of responsibility or sanctions applied. 2. New evidence is defined as new and substantial evidence that has appeared that could have not reasonably been discovered before the - 14 - Approved by: Graduate Council (February 14, 2024), Graduate and Professional Student Association (February 21, 2024) determination of responsibility was made, and that could have substantially impacted determinations of responsibility. 3. Disproportionate Sanctions are where sanctions are grossly disproportionate to the findings of responsibility. b. A Respondent who wishes to request an appeal of a decision of the Honor Board Hearing Panel may do so by notifying in writing the Dean’s Designee within seven (7) working days after being notified of the Dean's Designee’s decision, except when the appeal is on the basis of new evidence, in which case more time may be granted upon request by the Dean’s Designee. Students requesting an appeal on the basis of new evidence may, with the permission of the Dean’s Designee, listen to a copy of the recording of the original hearing in the presence of an officer of the Honor Board. Access to the recording will not be provided to any other individual. c. The appeal document must be in writing and must provide evidence of procedural error, excessive sanction, and/or new evidence.

Collected: 2026-10-08 · 680–711
SHA-256: a58599e9ebc28170d881b63761e606e556ce549ce46214c46c03fcd3565bd968

Launch Copilot Faculty/Staff Documentation Student Documentation AI Guide Copilot is now available to all faculty, staff, and students at Tulane University as part of our Office365 license. This powerful AI tool is designed to enhance productivity, streamline tasks, and provide valuable support across various activities. The version of Copilot linked above is protected by our Enterprise Data Agreement. Queries run against this version of Copilot will not be centrally stored by Microsoft or trained against for future versions of the model. This pilot is "opt-in". While everyone has access to Copilot, the tool will not automatically engage with your processes, data or documents unless you specifically follow the link to Copilot and prompt the tool. Features Intelligent Assistance: Copilot can help draft emails, create documents, and generate reports, saving you time and effort. Data Analysis: Easily analyze data, create charts, and generate insights from complex datasets. Task Automation: Automate repetitive tasks, set reminders, and manage your schedule efficiently. Research Support: Get assistance with research by summarizing articles, finding relevant sources, and organizing information. Language Translation: Translate documents and communications into multiple languages, facilitating better collaboration. Limitations: Accuracy: While Copilot is useful, it may occasionally provide incorrect information. Always verify critical data. Context Understanding: Copilot may not fully understand complex or highly specific contexts without sufficient background information. Privacy: Ensure sensitive information is handled appropriately, as Copilot processes data to provide assistance. How does Copilot compare to other Generative AI platforms? For a more comprehensive list, click here. We are excited to see how Copilot will enhance your productivity and support your academic and administrative endeavors. To get started, simple click the link: Launch Copilot. For troubleshooting or support, please visit our Tulane IT Service Portal.

Collected: 2026-10-08 · 79–93
SHA-256: ea2f96ebcac48e8b4f35729df79956910b3fe16fcb1740197500f1bb73ad9d31

Do I have to go to a hearing? Not all cases are resolved with a hearing. However, if you have a prior violation of the Code of Academic Conduct or are facing possible suspension for an egregious violation, you will need to have a hearing with the NTC Honor Board. What is a hearing waiver? Students who have no prior violations may be offered the opportunity to accept responsibility and waive a hearing. Information on sanctions for first violations is listed in the letter you receive. Students may not barter sanctions if they wish to waive a hearing. Can a person dismiss my case? There is not a single adjudicator or person who will hear your case. After the initial review and issuing of charges, students must either have a hearing or submit a hearing waiver accepting responsibility (first violations only). How can I get an advisor for my case? A list of NTC Honor Board Advisors can also be provided to you if you wish to consult a faculty member outside of the Honor Board for advice. While advisors are permitted, they may not speak for you or participate in meetings with our office. You may also consult a staff or faculty member of your choice; however, that person will not have training in the Honor Board process. Will I be suspended or expelled? While a full list of sanctions is available in the Code of Academic Conduct, you should ask about the specific consequences in your case during the process or pre-hearing meeting. Students who have a prior violation are typically suspended for further violations. Students with egregious cheating, fabrication and false information are at risk of expulsion. Can I call witnesses for my hearing? Yes. If you know that another person has firsthand knowledge of the issue or incident, you may call them to share information and answer questions in a hearing. The reporter may be called as well, and any other students involved may be called to participate in a hearing or provide information to the Honor Board. No character witnesses or letters of support may be provided. Can I submit evidence for my case? If you have an upcoming hearing, you will be provided with an online form to add evidence for your case. You will be provided the evidence attached to letters from our office and will know what information is available to the Honor Board in advance of your hearing. How can you prove I did something wrong? The Honor Board uses the preponderance standard to weigh information and will determine if it is more likely than not that you violated the Code of Academic Conduct. No one needs to prove something beyond a reasonable doubt.

Collected: 2026-10-08 · 104–111
SHA-256: dd8b4d4219b33e7f20cfc10bf702c2d3cf43290c34a83b54b7ae7e00950e8ff3