Policy presence
The New School, New York City and Paris has 3 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
New York, United States
The New School, New York City and Paris has 3 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
The New School, New York City and Paris has 1 source-backed public claim for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: required.
The New School, New York City and Paris has 1 source-backed public claim for coursework; deterministic analysis status: required.
The New School, New York City and Paris has 1 source-backed public claim for exams; deterministic analysis status: required.
The New School, New York City and Paris has 2 source-backed public claims for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
No source-backed public claim about academic-integrity treatment of AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about AI use under academic integrity, misconduct, dishonesty, plagiarism, or cheating rules.
The New School, New York City and Paris has 3 source-backed public claims for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
The New School, New York City and Paris has 3 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
No source-backed public claim about teaching guidance is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about instructor, classroom, assessment-design, or syllabus guidance.
No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.
The New School, New York City and Paris has 1 source-backed public claim for security and procurement; deterministic analysis status: required.
No tool-level evidence is published for this record yet. Broad AI tool mentions are not expanded into named tool conclusions.
4 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Ai Tool Treatment
Normalized value: human_review_required_for_mc_professional_ai_output
Original evidence
Evidence 1Ensure that people review AI output. People must evaluate, fact-check, edit, and document all AI-generated content before using it in their professional work.
Privacy
Normalized value: meeting_recording_summary_ai_requires_participant_consent_for_mc
Original evidence
Evidence 1Before AI technology is used to summarize and record meetings and other proceedings, consent must be obtained from all participants.
Security Review
Normalized value: mc_ai_use_must_not_violate_university_standards_or_policies
Original evidence
Evidence 1AI tools should never be used in any way that would violate university standards or policies. Two policies that must be reviewed are the Acceptable Use Policy and the Standard for Information and System Classification.
Privacy
Normalized value: sensitive_personal_data_upload_to_ai_for_audience_prediction_unapproved_for_mc
Original evidence
Evidence 1Unapproved Usage: Staff members upload check-in data or sensitive contact and personal information (phone, home address, salary, Social Security number, etc.) to AI-powered platforms to predict future event attendance.
0 machine or needs-review claim
1 source attribution
newschool.edu