Lubbock, United States

Texas Tech University

Last checkedMay 18, 2026Last changedMay 18, 2026Review: Agent reviewedConfidence96%

Public JSON Change log Monthly report Citation rules Dataset access Analysis JSON Submit correction

Policy statusReviewed evidence-backed recordReview: Agent reviewedClaim coverage5 reviewedEvidence-backed claims5Reviewed5Candidate0Official sources5Source languageenPublic JSON/api/public/v1/universities/texas-tech-university.json

Coverage score85/100Coverage labelbroad public coverageReview: Machine candidateAnalysis confidence79%

Policy presence

Texas Tech University has 3 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.

UnclearMachine candidateConfidence79%Evidence3Sources3

Claim claim-ttu-thesis-ai-limits Claim claim-ttu-ai-data-protection Claim claim-ttu-ai-detection-not-sole-evidence

AI disclosure

No source-backed public claim about AI disclosure or acknowledgement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about disclosing, acknowledging, citing, or declaring AI use.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Coursework

Texas Tech University has 3 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: restricted.

RestrictedMachine candidateConfidence79%Evidence3Sources3

Claim claim-ttu-ai-own-work-integrity Claim claim-ttu-ai-data-protection Claim claim-ttu-ai-detection-not-sole-evidence

Exams

Texas Tech University has 3 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: restricted.

RestrictedMachine candidateConfidence78%Evidence3Sources3

Claim claim-ttu-ai-own-work-integrity Claim claim-ttu-ai-syllabus-disclosure Claim claim-ttu-ai-detection-not-sole-evidence

Privacy and data entry

Texas Tech University has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.

RestrictedMachine candidateConfidence79%Evidence1Sources1

Claim claim-ttu-ai-data-protection

Academic integrity

Texas Tech University has 2 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: restricted.

RestrictedMachine candidateConfidence78%Evidence2Sources2

Claim claim-ttu-ai-own-work-integrity Claim claim-ttu-ai-detection-not-sole-evidence

Approved tools

Texas Tech University has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: restricted.

RestrictedMachine candidateConfidence79%Evidence1Sources1

Claim claim-ttu-ai-data-protection

Named AI services

Texas Tech University has 1 source-backed public claim for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: restricted.

RestrictedMachine candidateConfidence79%Evidence1Sources1

Claim claim-ttu-ai-data-protection

Teaching guidance

Texas Tech University has 3 source-backed public claims for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.

RecommendedMachine candidateConfidence79%Evidence3Sources3

Claim claim-ttu-ai-own-work-integrity Claim claim-ttu-ai-data-protection Claim claim-ttu-ai-syllabus-disclosure

Research guidance

Texas Tech University has 1 source-backed public claim for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: restricted.

RestrictedMachine candidateConfidence82%Evidence1Sources1

Claim claim-ttu-thesis-ai-limits

Security and procurement

No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Derived tool records0

No tool-level evidence is published for this record yet. Broad AI tool mentions are not expanded into named tool conclusions.

Evidence-backed claims

5 reviewed evidence-backed public claim

Normalized value: thesis dissertation ai cannot author; may edit not create; ai use agreement required

Last checked: May 18, 2026
Last changed: May 18, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1

AI cannot be considered an author or co-author of a thesis or dissertation. Students may not use AI (generative or otherwise) tools to write or significantly rewrite the thesis or dissertation document.
Source: AI Guidance for TTU Theses and Dissertations

Source language: English (en)
Snapshot hash: a92b68bfdfe1e994710c466aa29a6df3c3ffc1898de0ccaa3d23ad99e12e7806
Retrieved: May 18, 2026
Evidence locator: AI Guidance for TTU Theses and Dissertations, guideline 1

Normalized value: ai-generated content must not be submitted as own work in recommended syllabus language

Last checked: May 18, 2026
Last changed: May 18, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1

AI-generated content must never be submitted as your own work. Doing so may constitute a violation of academic integrity and may be referred to the Office of Student Conduct.
Source: AI Use Syllabus Statements

Source language: English (en)
Snapshot hash: ed1b8a2ef10e87c14aac59d42af29a9d1af577b490018dc34733fd0395c0ddb0
Retrieved: May 18, 2026
Evidence locator: Generative AI Use is Encouraged and Allowed in this course

Normalized value: no institutional generative AI agreements; private and sensitive data not appropriate for AI platforms

Last checked: May 18, 2026
Last changed: May 18, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1

Currently, Texas Tech does not hold institutional agreements with generative AI providers. As a result, no university-level data protections are in place for faculty or students using these tools.
Source: Navigating Generative AI Together

Source language: English (en)
Snapshot hash: 3bf13fe930964d289ae9b81b3f8ac61a3d89fff9603cc8f76747d0cc82ff1ae6
Retrieved: May 18, 2026
Evidence locator: A Word of Caution on Generative AI Tools and Data Privacy

Normalized value: faculty encouraged to specify generative AI use in syllabus

Last checked: May 18, 2026
Last changed: May 18, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1

Faculty are encouraged to include a clear statement in their syllabus regarding the permitted or prohibited use of generative AI. The following examples offer baseline language you may adapt to fit your course objectives and pedagogical values.
Source: AI Teaching Resources

Source language: English (en)
Snapshot hash: 9f69286a3e6d536742208704b14e58cf6b48687fc39e22e427bf380824d79105
Retrieved: May 18, 2026
Evidence locator: Syllabus Statements section

Normalized value: ai detection not sufficient sole evidence

Last checked: May 18, 2026
Last changed: May 18, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1

Remember that an AI detection tool will not be sufficient as sole evidence of academic misconduct. These tools cannot be considered conclusive and may be problematic in determining if a violation occurred.
Source: What Steps Do I Take if I Suspect Academic Misconduct with AI?

Source language: English (en)
Snapshot hash: 97258d440cb3ba32db403c889c82117df57d90cebb3149f97a817ae1e48020cd
Retrieved: May 18, 2026
Evidence locator: Some recommendations for faculty

Candidate claims

0 machine or needs-review claim

Official sources

5 source attribution

AI Guidance for TTU Theses and Dissertations

depts.ttu.edu

Source URL: https://www.depts.ttu.edu/gradschool/academic/thesis_diss/forms/2023-2024/AI_Guidance_for_TTU_Theses_and_Dissertations.pdf
Snapshot hash: a92b68bfdfe1e994710c466aa29a6df3c3ffc1898de0ccaa3d23ad99e12e7806

AI Teaching Resources

depts.ttu.edu

Source URL: https://www.depts.ttu.edu/tlpdc/ai-resources/teaching-with-ai.php
Snapshot hash: 9f69286a3e6d536742208704b14e58cf6b48687fc39e22e427bf380824d79105

AI Use Syllabus Statements

depts.ttu.edu

Source URL: https://www.depts.ttu.edu/tlpdc/AI-Syllabus-Statements.php
Snapshot hash: ed1b8a2ef10e87c14aac59d42af29a9d1af577b490018dc34733fd0395c0ddb0

Navigating Generative AI Together

depts.ttu.edu

Source URL: https://www.depts.ttu.edu/tlpdc/ai-resources/GenAI-Faculty-Guidance-for-Teaching.pdf
Snapshot hash: 3bf13fe930964d289ae9b81b3f8ac61a3d89fff9603cc8f76747d0cc82ff1ae6

What Steps Do I Take if I Suspect Academic Misconduct with AI?

depts.ttu.edu

Source URL: https://www.depts.ttu.edu/tlpdc/ai-resources/Academic-Misconduct-with-AI.pdf
Snapshot hash: 97258d440cb3ba32db403c889c82117df57d90cebb3149f97a817ae1e48020cd

Last checkedMay 18, 2026Last changedMay 18, 2026Open change log

Open contribution paths Review workflow

Back to universities

Texas Tech University

Record status

Policy profile

Policy presence

AI disclosure

Coursework

Exams

Privacy and data entry

Academic integrity

Approved tools

Named AI services

Teaching guidance

Research guidance

Security and procurement

AI tools

Evidence-backed claims

Texas Tech Graduate School guidance for theses and dissertations says AI cannot be an author or co-author, students may not use AI tools to write or significantly rewrite the thesis or dissertation, and an AI use agreement is required when AI tools are used.

Texas Tech's recommended AI syllabus language says AI-generated content should not be submitted as a student's own work and may constitute an academic integrity violation.

Texas Tech faculty guidance states that the university does not hold institutional agreements with generative AI providers and cautions faculty not to input private or sensitive data into AI platforms.

Texas Tech TLPDC encourages faculty to include clear syllabus statements describing permitted or prohibited generative AI use, with examples that can be adapted to course objectives.

Texas Tech TLPDC academic misconduct guidance says AI detection tools are not sufficient as sole evidence of academic misconduct.

Candidate claims

Official sources

AI Guidance for TTU Theses and Dissertations

AI Teaching Resources

AI Use Syllabus Statements

Navigating Generative AI Together

What Steps Do I Take if I Suspect Academic Misconduct with AI?

Change log

Corrections