Policy presence
Rice University has 5 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Houston, United States
Rice University has 5 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Rice University has 2 source-backed public claims for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: required.
Rice University has 4 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: required.
Rice University has 4 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: required.
Rice University has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Rice University has 2 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: required.
Rice University has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: required.
Rice University has 2 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Rice University has 3 source-backed public claims for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.
Rice University has 2 source-backed public claims for security and procurement; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Rice University
5 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Academic Integrity
Normalized value: ai_generated_ideas_presented_as_own_plagiarism_course_specific_policy_supersedes
Original evidence
Evidence 1"Utilizing AI software to generate ideas and pass them off as one's own will also be considered plagiarism and will be adjudicated as such." This policy was voted on and ratified as of 2023. While this policy governs all academic work, professors are allowed to create their own course-specific AI policies.
Privacy
Normalized value: sensitive_confidential_information_not_for_public_ai_services_security_review_before_licensing
Original evidence
Evidence 1Information considered sensitive or confidential by University Policy 808 ( https://policy.rice.edu/808 ), including private information about individuals and protected research data, should not be used with consumer-focused or publicly available AI services. Before licensing new services, including Generative AI services, contact the Information Security Office.
Academic Integrity
Normalized value: instructor_permission_required_for_coursework_ai_use
Original evidence
Evidence 1Use of AI tools like ChatGPT, Grammarly, or image generators is only allowed if your instructor explicitly says so. Each course may have different rules. Always check the syllabus or ask your professor before using AI to help with assignments.
Teaching
Normalized value: faculty_urged_to_include_ai_syllabus_policy_and_llm_citation_guidance
Original evidence
Evidence 1To foster transparency and manage expectations, we urge you to include a section in your syllabus outlining your stance on AI usage in your course. This can cover whether students are permitted to use such tools for assignments and the extent of their allowed use. Also, please note that the honor council guidance notes that the use of an LLM (referred to broadly in the undergraduate honor council update as AI) must be cited.
Ai Tool Treatment
Normalized value: supported_ai_tools_must_follow_ai_usage_guidelines_and_tool_documentation
Original evidence
Evidence 1The university provides access to tools like Grammarly, Zoom: AI Companion, Microsoft Copilot (formerly Bing Chat Enterprise), Gemini, and NotebookLM. Use must follow Rice's AI Usage Guidelines and tool-specific support documentation.
0 machine or needs-review claim
5 source attribution
responsibleai.rice.edu
honor.rice.edu
tss.rice.edu
provost.rice.edu
responsibleai.rice.edu