Policy presence
Radboud University has 1 source-backed public claim for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Nijmegen, Netherlands
Radboud University
Radboud University is listed as QS 2026 rank 279. Radboud University has 5 source-backed AI policy claim records from 3 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
Short answer
v1 public contract
Radboud University is listed as QS 2026 rank 279. Radboud University has 5 source-backed AI policy claim records from 3 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
Citation-ready summary
As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists Radboud University as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 15, 2026 and last changed on May 15, 2026. The record contains 5 source-backed claims, including 5 reviewed claims, from 3 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/radboud-university.json. The entity-level confidence is 94%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy signals in this record
- Evidence includes Academic integrity claims.
- Evidence includes Privacy claims.
- Evidence includes AI tool treatment claims.
- Evidence includes Teaching claims.
- Named AI services detected in public claims: ChatGPT, Microsoft Copilot, Gemini.
- Privacy, sensitive-data, or security language appears in the public claim text.
Review: Agent reviewed
This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.
This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy profile
Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.
Review: Machine candidate
Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.
Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.
AI disclosure
Radboud University has 1 source-backed public claim for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Coursework
Radboud University has 3 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: allowed.
Exams
Radboud University has 3 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: allowed.
Privacy and data entry
Radboud University has 2 source-backed public claims for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Academic integrity
Radboud University has 1 source-backed public claim for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: allowed.
Approved tools
Radboud University has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: allowed.
Named AI services
Radboud University has 5 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Teaching guidance
Radboud University has 1 source-backed public claim for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Research guidance
No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.
Security and procurement
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.
Evidence-backed claims
5 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Academic Integrity
Radboud University says students may use ChatGPT or other AI tools during their studies only with lecturer approval and when they mention that they used it.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: ai_tools_require_lecturer_approval_and_disclosure
Original evidence
Evidence 1This means that you may only use ChatGPT or other AI tools during your studies when you have lecturer’s approval and when you mention that you have used it.
Privacy
Radboud University advises users not to input sensitive or critical business information or personal data when using AI, and says not to share personal data without consent.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: do_not_input_sensitive_or_personal_data_without_consent
Original evidence
Evidence 1In addition, we advise that you do not input sensitive or critical business information or personal data when using AI. In any case, do not share personal data without consent.
Ai Tool Treatment
Radboud University requests that staff and students who wish to use AI choose Copilot Chat.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: copilot_chat_preferred
Original evidence
Evidence 1At Radboud University, the AI assistant Copilot Chat is available: an AI assistant that prioritises data security. We therefore request that staff and students who wish to use AI choose Copilot Chat.
Privacy
Radboud University says free tools such as ChatGPT and Google Gemini are not recommended because they pose privacy and security risks.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: free_ai_tools_not_recommended_privacy_security
Original evidence
Evidence 1The use of free tools like ChatGPT and Google Gemini is not recommended, as it poses various privacy and security risks. The data you enter is used to further train the tool.
Teaching
Radboud University's lecturer guidance says lecturers have responsibility to help students use tools such as ChatGPT responsibly and point out risks.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: lecturers_help_students_use_ai_responsibly
Original evidence
Evidence 1Ultimately, the responsibility for the use of tools such as ChatGPT lies with the student themselves, but lecturers do have the responsibility to help students deal with this in a responsible manner and to point out the risks.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.
Official sources
3 source attribution
AI in education
ru.nl
Fraud and plagiarism
ru.nl
Using generative AI at Radboud University
ru.nl
Change log
Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.
View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.
Corrections and missing evidence
Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.
If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.