West Lafayette, United States

Purdue University

Last checkedMay 14, 2026Last changedMay 14, 2026Review: Agent reviewedConfidence98%

Public JSON Change log Monthly report Citation rules Dataset access Analysis JSON Submit correction

Policy statusReviewed evidence-backed recordReview: Agent reviewedClaim coverage11 reviewedEvidence-backed claims11Reviewed11Candidate0Official sources5Source languageenPublic JSON/api/public/v1/universities/purdue-university.json

Coverage score100/100Coverage labelbroad public coverageReview: Machine candidateAnalysis confidence80%

Policy presence

Purdue University has 5 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.

UnclearMachine candidateConfidence81%Evidence5Sources2

Claim claim-purdue-ai-not-sole-factor-decisions Claim claim-purdue-ai-tools-it-resources Claim claim-purdue-ai-detection-not-sole-determinant

AI disclosure

Purdue University has 1 source-backed public claim for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: recommended.

RecommendedMachine candidateConfidence76%Evidence1Sources1

Claim claim-purdue-toolkit-common-tools-access

Coursework

Purdue University has 5 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: conditionally_allowed.

Conditionally AllowedMachine candidateConfidence81%Evidence5Sources2

Claim claim-purdue-ai-tools-it-resources Claim claim-purdue-ai-detection-not-sole-determinant Claim claim-purdue-instructor-pii-third-party-ai

Exams

Purdue University has 5 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: restricted.

RestrictedMachine candidateConfidence81%Evidence5Sources2

Claim claim-purdue-sensitive-restricted-data-prior-approval Claim claim-purdue-ai-tools-it-resources Claim claim-purdue-ai-detection-not-sole-determinant

Privacy and data entry

Purdue University has 4 source-backed public claims for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.

RestrictedMachine candidateConfidence81%Evidence4Sources3

Claim claim-purdue-sensitive-restricted-data-prior-approval Claim claim-purdue-ai-tools-it-resources Claim claim-purdue-instructor-pii-third-party-ai

Academic integrity

Purdue University has 2 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: conditionally_allowed.

Conditionally AllowedMachine candidateConfidence81%Evidence2Sources1

Claim claim-purdue-ai-detection-not-sole-determinant Claim claim-purdue-teaching-course-level-authorization

Approved tools

Purdue University has 4 source-backed public claims for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: required.

RequiredMachine candidateConfidence80%Evidence4Sources3

Claim claim-purdue-unapproved-ai-tools-review-required Claim claim-purdue-ai-tools-it-resources Claim claim-purdue-data-ethics-review-use-cases

Named AI services

Purdue University has 5 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: restricted.

RestrictedMachine candidateConfidence81%Evidence5Sources3

Claim claim-purdue-sensitive-restricted-data-prior-approval Claim claim-purdue-unapproved-ai-tools-review-required Claim claim-purdue-ai-tools-it-resources

Teaching guidance

Purdue University has 4 source-backed public claims for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.

RecommendedMachine candidateConfidence81%Evidence4Sources1

Claim claim-purdue-ai-detection-not-sole-determinant Claim claim-purdue-instructor-pii-third-party-ai Claim claim-purdue-teaching-course-level-authorization

Research guidance

No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Security and procurement

Purdue University has 2 source-backed public claims for security and procurement; deterministic analysis status: required.

RequiredMachine candidateConfidence81%Evidence2Sources2

Claim claim-purdue-unapproved-ai-tools-review-required Claim claim-purdue-data-ethics-review-use-cases

Derived tool records1

AI tools

Purdue University

Tool: AI tools
About: Not specified
Access: Not specified
Cost: Not specified
Availability: Unknown
Review: Agent reviewed
Sources: Source 1 Source 2 Source 3

Evidence-backed claims

11 reviewed evidence-backed public claim

Normalized value: sensitive_restricted_data_requires_prior_approval

Last checked: May 14, 2026
Last changed: May 14, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1

Sensitive and Restricted Data, as defined in the Acceptable Use policy, must not be entered into AI tools without prior approval. Usage cases include training or testing AI tools.
Source: Artificial Intelligence Use (VII.A.5)

Localized display only

Prior approval is required before Sensitive or Restricted Data is entered into AI tools.

Source language: English (en)
Snapshot hash: 2a9bc01844dcb4e1016786b35baacb98da11e4cf65f6f867c444f51bb674dbd2
Retrieved: May 14, 2026
Evidence locator: Statement of Policy

Normalized value: ai_not_sole_factor_for_personnel_award_disciplinary_decisions

Last checked: May 14, 2026
Last changed: May 14, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1

AI may be used to inform decision makers, but it must not be the sole factor used in making personnel, award or disciplinary decisions.
Source: Artificial Intelligence Use (VII.A.5)

Localized display only

AI may inform decisions, but not be the sole factor in listed decision categories.

Source language: English (en)
Snapshot hash: 2a9bc01844dcb4e1016786b35baacb98da11e4cf65f6f867c444f51bb674dbd2
Retrieved: May 14, 2026
Evidence locator: Statement of Policy

Normalized value: unlisted_ai_tools_require_new_it_solutions_and_services_review

Last checked: May 14, 2026
Last changed: May 14, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1

A New IT Solutions and Services Review is required for use of any AI tools, whether developed externally or internally, not already on the approved AI tools list.
Source: Artificial Intelligence Use (VII.A.5)

Localized display only

AI tools outside the approved list require New IT Solutions and Services Review.

Source language: English (en)
Snapshot hash: 2a9bc01844dcb4e1016786b35baacb98da11e4cf65f6f867c444f51bb674dbd2
Retrieved: May 14, 2026
Evidence locator: Statement of Policy

Normalized value: ai_tools_as_it_resources_and_data_as_information_assets

Last checked: May 14, 2026
Last changed: May 14, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1

AI tools and the university data used with them are IT Resources and Information Assets, respectively, as defined within and subject to the Acceptable Use policy.
Source: Artificial Intelligence Use (VII.A.5)

Localized display only

Purdue classifies AI tools and related university data under existing IT-resource and information-asset controls.

Source language: English (en)
Snapshot hash: 2a9bc01844dcb4e1016786b35baacb98da11e4cf65f6f867c444f51bb674dbd2
Retrieved: May 14, 2026
Evidence locator: Statement of Policy

Normalized value: student_ai_authorization_determined_by_instructor_at_course_level

Last checked: May 14, 2026
Last changed: May 14, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1

The instructor, therefore, should determine and inform students when the use of AI is authorized or unauthorized. Authorization is determined at the course level by the instructor.
Source: Guidance on the Use of AI in Teaching and Learning

Localized display only

Purdue places student AI-use authorization at the course level under instructor communication.

Source language: English (en)
Snapshot hash: c1008eb0705bfb6063e04440402a7294e07a4715cc3348e858f9c48e19dd8011
Retrieved: May 14, 2026
Evidence locator: Syllabus Language

Normalized value: ai_detection_positive_not_sole_factor_for_academic_integrity_violation

Last checked: May 14, 2026
Last changed: May 14, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1

a positive result from one of these tools is not the sole determining factor of an academic integrity violation and subsequent consequences.
Source: Guidance on the Use of AI in Teaching and Learning

Localized display only

AI-detection results should not alone determine an academic-integrity violation or consequences.

Source language: English (en)
Snapshot hash: c1008eb0705bfb6063e04440402a7294e07a4715cc3348e858f9c48e19dd8011
Retrieved: May 14, 2026
Evidence locator: Use of AI Detection

Normalized value: instructors_should_never_share_student_pii_with_third_party_ai_tools

Last checked: May 14, 2026
Last changed: May 14, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1

Commit to never sharing personally identifiable information about students with any third-party AI tool
Source: Guidance on the Use of AI in Teaching and Learning

Localized display only

Instructors should not share student PII with third-party AI tools.

Source language: English (en)
Snapshot hash: c1008eb0705bfb6063e04440402a7294e07a4715cc3348e858f9c48e19dd8011
Retrieved: May 14, 2026
Evidence locator: FERPA and Other Privacy Issues

Normalized value: data_or_human_decision_use_cases_require_data_ethics_committee_review

Last checked: May 14, 2026
Last changed: May 14, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1

Purdue University policy requires AI use cases that use Purdue data and/or make decisions on behalf of humans must be reviewed and approved by the Data Ethics Committee.
Source: AI Governance and Review

Localized display only

Purdue describes Data Ethics Committee review for AI use cases involving Purdue data or human-facing decisions.

Source language: English (en)
Snapshot hash: 981126e39c50499c499cb0af7abdc2e07edf5a31ef5d4c05dadd1c8cbd5ef0a2
Retrieved: May 14, 2026
Evidence locator: Use Case Review Process

Normalized value: syllabus_should_include_ai_use_detection_and_consequence_guidance

Last checked: May 14, 2026
Last changed: May 14, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1

On the course syllabus, instructors should include specific guidance on: Allowable use of AI tools by students for assessed work in the course.
Source: Guidance on the Use of AI in Teaching and Learning

Localized display only

Purdue asks instructors to state AI expectations in course syllabi, including assessed-work uses.

Source language: English (en)
Snapshot hash: c1008eb0705bfb6063e04440402a7294e07a4715cc3348e858f9c48e19dd8011
Retrieved: May 14, 2026
Evidence locator: Syllabus Language

Normalized value: toolkit_treat_ai_input_as_potentially_public_and_avoid_sensitive_confidential_restricted_data

Last checked: May 14, 2026
Last changed: May 14, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1

When using AI tools, including those listed here, you should treat all data entered as potentially public. Do not input or process any sensitive, confidential or restricted data through these tools.
Source: Generative AI Toolkit

Localized display only

The toolkit gives a broad data-privacy caution for listed AI tools.

Source language: English (en)
Snapshot hash: 8372412f2bb944a83755ffebc8ddbd741ccb2d2bad1cf93420d979a312149dc5
Retrieved: May 14, 2026
Evidence locator: Important Data Privacy Notice

Normalized value: toolkit_lists_genai_studio_copilot_chat_teams_premium_m365_copilot_scite

Last checked: May 14, 2026
Last changed: May 14, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1

Feature / Capability | GenAI Studio | Copilot Chat | Teams Premium | M365 Copilot | Scite | Access | Free to all | Free to all | $25 per user annually | $360 per user annually | Free to all
Source: Generative AI Toolkit

Localized display only

The toolkit table identifies Purdue University AI tools and access terms.

Source language: English (en)
Snapshot hash: 8372412f2bb944a83755ffebc8ddbd741ccb2d2bad1cf93420d979a312149dc5
Retrieved: May 14, 2026
Evidence locator: AI Tools and Capabilities

Candidate claims

0 machine or needs-review claim

Official sources

5 source attribution

AI Governance and Review

purdue.edu

Source URL: https://www.purdue.edu/ai/ai-governance-and-review/
Snapshot hash: 981126e39c50499c499cb0af7abdc2e07edf5a31ef5d4c05dadd1c8cbd5ef0a2

Application of the Artificial Intelligence (AI) Use Policy

purdue.edu

Source URL: https://www.purdue.edu/securepurdue/it-policies-standards/Application%20of%20AI.php
Snapshot hash: 44aab7670e0a692c49482566f3469506be4483ee02e81d408f2c85a99c4ce9e6

Artificial Intelligence Use (VII.A.5)

purdue.edu

Source URL: https://www.purdue.edu/vpec/policies/information-technology/viia5/
Snapshot hash: 2a9bc01844dcb4e1016786b35baacb98da11e4cf65f6f867c444f51bb674dbd2

Generative AI Toolkit

purdue.edu

Source URL: https://www.purdue.edu/ai/generative-ai-toolkit/
Snapshot hash: 8372412f2bb944a83755ffebc8ddbd741ccb2d2bad1cf93420d979a312149dc5

Guidance on the Use of AI in Teaching and Learning

purdue.edu

Source URL: https://www.purdue.edu/teaching-learning/instructors/ai.php
Snapshot hash: c1008eb0705bfb6063e04440402a7294e07a4715cc3348e858f9c48e19dd8011

Last checkedMay 14, 2026Last changedMay 14, 2026Open change log

Open contribution paths Review workflow

Back to universities

Purdue University

Record status

Policy profile

Policy presence

AI disclosure

Coursework

Exams

Privacy and data entry

Academic integrity

Approved tools

Named AI services

Teaching guidance

Research guidance

Security and procurement

AI tools

AI tools

Evidence-backed claims

Purdue requires prior approval before Sensitive or Restricted Data is entered into AI tools, including training or testing AI tools.

Purdue allows AI to inform decision makers, but the AI Use policy says AI must not be the sole factor in personnel, award, or disciplinary decisions.

Purdue requires a New IT Solutions and Services Review for AI tools not already on the approved AI tools list, whether developed externally or internally.

Purdue's AI Use policy treats AI tools and university data used with them as IT Resources and Information Assets subject to Purdue acceptable-use and security/privacy policy controls.

Purdue teaching guidance says instructors should determine and tell students when AI use is authorized or unauthorized; authorization is determined at the course level.

Purdue teaching guidance warns that an AI-detection positive result should not be the sole determining factor for an academic-integrity violation and subsequent consequences.

Purdue teaching guidance says instructors should commit to never sharing personally identifiable student information with third-party AI tools.

Purdue says AI use cases that use Purdue data or make decisions on behalf of humans must be reviewed and approved by the Data Ethics Committee.

Purdue teaching guidance says instructors should include specific syllabus guidance on allowable AI-tool use, learning-process use, detection approaches, and potential consequences.

Purdue's AI toolkit tells users to treat data entered into AI tools as potentially public and not to input sensitive, confidential, or restricted data through the listed tools.

Purdue's AI toolkit lists GenAI Studio, Copilot Chat, Teams Premium, M365 Copilot, and Scite as Purdue University AI tools with access terms for users.

Candidate claims

Official sources

AI Governance and Review

Application of the Artificial Intelligence (AI) Use Policy

Artificial Intelligence Use (VII.A.5)

Generative AI Toolkit

Guidance on the Use of AI in Teaching and Learning

Change log

Corrections