Policy presence
National Institute of Technology, Tiruchirappalli has 1 source-backed public claim for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Tiruchirappalli, India
National Institute of Technology, Tiruchirappalli
Record status
Review: Agent reviewed
Policy profile
Review: Machine candidate
AI disclosure
No source-backed public claim about AI disclosure or acknowledgement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about disclosing, acknowledging, citing, or declaring AI use.
Coursework
National Institute of Technology, Tiruchirappalli has 3 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: conditionally_allowed.
Exams
National Institute of Technology, Tiruchirappalli has 3 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: conditionally_allowed.
Privacy and data entry
No source-backed public claim about privacy or data-entry restrictions is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about personal, confidential, sensitive, regulated, or student data entry into AI tools.
Academic integrity
National Institute of Technology, Tiruchirappalli has 3 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: conditionally_allowed.
Approved tools
No source-backed public claim identifying approved or licensed AI tools is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence that identifies institutionally approved, licensed, procured, or enterprise AI tools.
Named AI services
National Institute of Technology, Tiruchirappalli has 1 source-backed public claim for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Teaching guidance
National Institute of Technology, Tiruchirappalli has 1 source-backed public claim for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Research guidance
No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.
Security and procurement
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
AI tools
No tool-level evidence is published for this record yet. Broad AI tool mentions are not expanded into named tool conclusions.
Evidence-backed claims
3 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Academic Integrity
NITT's 2024 PG Regulations classify possession of mobile phones, carrying unauthorized notes, communicating with other students, or copying during an assessment as punishable academic dishonesty, with zero marks for offenders.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: PG assessment conduct: specified conduct is academic dishonesty and punishable; zero marks penalty stated.
Original evidence
Evidence 1Possession of a mobile phone, carrying unauthorized notes, communicating with other students, or copying during an assessment shall be considered an act of academic dishonesty and is punishable. Offenders will be awarded zero marks.
Teaching
NITT's 2024 PG Regulations say each course faculty prepares a course plan and that the course plan outlines assessment components, attendance requirements, academic integrity guidelines, and study material information.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: PG course plans include assessment components, attendance requirements, academic integrity guidelines, and study material information.
Original evidence
Evidence 1The course plan shall outline assessment components such as assignments, quizzes, group tasks, field-visit reports, open-book tests, laboratory exercises, mini-projects, and the final assessment, along with attendance requirements, academic integrity guidelines, and study material information.
Academic Integrity
In a 2025 official Parliament QA PDF, NITT described ChatGPT-like generative AI use in higher education and said related policies were being evolved, including Turnitin checks for plagiarism and auto-generated content and plagiarism validation for code.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: AI-related academic-integrity measures described as evolving; Turnitin and code plagiarism validation mentioned.
Original evidence
Evidence 1At our institute, the following policies are being evolved: We use Turnitin software to check for plagiarism which also points out the amount of auto-generated contents from software like ChatGPT. The code (programs) is also validated with plagiarism software to determine the visibility of the code.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Official sources
2 source attribution
Parliament QA 2025
nitt.edu
PG Regulations 2024
nitt.edu