Policy presence
Missouri University of Science and Technology has 4 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Rolla, United States
Missouri University of Science and Technology
Missouri University of Science and Technology has 6 source-backed AI policy claims from 3 official source attributions. Review state: agent reviewed; 6 reviewed claims. Last checked May 17, 2026.
Missouri University of Science and Technology AI policy short answer
v1 public contract
Missouri University of Science and Technology has 6 source-backed AI policy claims from 3 official source attributions, including 6 reviewed claims. The record review state is agent reviewed; original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, confidence, and public JSON are preserved for citation. Last checked May 17, 2026. Discovery context: Missouri University of Science and Technology is listed as QS 2026 rank =628.
Citation-ready summary
As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists Missouri University of Science and Technology as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 17, 2026 and last changed on May 17, 2026. The record contains 6 source-backed claims, including 6 reviewed claims, from 3 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/missouri-university-of-science-and-technology.json. The entity-level confidence is 94%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy signals in this record
- Evidence includes Academic integrity claims.
- Evidence includes Privacy claims.
- Evidence includes Teaching claims.
- Evidence includes AI tool treatment claims.
- Evidence includes Procurement claims.
- Named AI services detected in public claims: ChatGPT.
- Teaching, assessment, coursework, or syllabus-related language appears in the public claim text.
- Privacy, sensitive-data, or security language appears in the public claim text.
Review: Agent reviewed
This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.
This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy profile
Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.
Review: Machine candidate
Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.
Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.
AI disclosure
No source-backed public claim about AI disclosure or acknowledgement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about disclosing, acknowledging, citing, or declaring AI use.
Coursework
Missouri University of Science and Technology has 4 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: conditionally_allowed.
Exams
Missouri University of Science and Technology has 4 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: conditionally_allowed.
Privacy and data entry
Missouri University of Science and Technology has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Academic integrity
Missouri University of Science and Technology has 1 source-backed public claim for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: conditionally_allowed.
Approved tools
Missouri University of Science and Technology has 3 source-backed public claims for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Named AI services
Missouri University of Science and Technology has 4 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Teaching guidance
Missouri University of Science and Technology has 4 source-backed public claims for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Research guidance
Missouri University of Science and Technology has 1 source-backed public claim for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Security and procurement
Missouri University of Science and Technology has 5 source-backed public claims for security and procurement; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.
Evidence-backed claims
6 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Academic Integrity
Missouri S&T's Dean of Students academic-integrity resource says using AI tools like ChatGPT in coursework requires instructor approval, and unauthorized AI use may violate university regulations and be considered plagiarism.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: coursework_ai_requires_instructor_approval
Original evidence
Evidence 1Using AI tools like ChatGPT in coursework requires instructor approval to align with Missouri S&T's academic integrity policies. Unauthorized use may violate university regulations and be considered plagiarism. To maintain academic honesty, students should clarify AI usage guidelines with their instructors before applying these tools.
Privacy
Missouri S&T's Information Technology AI best practices caution users not to use AI with sensitive data unless approved, including student information, restricted grant information, unpublished research, or other works in progress.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: sensitive_data_requires_approval
Original evidence
Evidence 1Prioritize protecting intellectual property and data over results. Do not utilize AI when dealing with sensitive data, unless approved, such as student information, restricted grant information, unpublished research, or other works in progress.
Teaching
Missouri S&T's CAFE GAI Guidelines state that the UM System does not endorse or provide an AI checker and caution faculty against trying to use this type of software because the tools have been shown to be unreliable and biased.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: um_system_no_ai_checker_endorsement
Original evidence
Evidence 1The UM system does not endorse nor provide an AI checker. These have been shown to be highly unreliable and biased. Faculty are therefore cautioned against attempting to use this type of software.
Ai Tool Treatment
Missouri S&T's Information Technology AI page encourages responsible and ethical AI use by students, faculty, and staff and frames the page as guidance for academic and workplace AI use, compliance considerations, and approved AI tools.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: responsible_ai_guidance_and_approved_tools
Original evidence
Evidence 1The campus encourages the responsible and ethical use of AI by students, faculty, and staff. This page provides guidance on how AI can be integrated into academic and workplace settings, outlines compliance considerations, and highlights approved AI tools currently available for use.
Procurement
Missouri S&T's Information Technology AI page says users should check the approved software list before using AI-including software with embedded AI-and that IT Compliance must review and approve each software use case to meet the Board of Curators technology acquisition policy.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: approved_software_list_and_it_compliance_review
Original evidence
Evidence 1Although many software titles have AI included, not all are approved for use at S&T. Check the approved software list before using. Missouri S&T's IT teams continually monitor emerging technologies... To meet the Board of Curators technology acquisition policy (BPM 12004), IT Compliance must review and approve each software use case.
Teaching
Missouri S&T's CAFE GAI Guidelines say a faculty task force developed criteria for course policies on student GAI use, recommend that faculty include a written policy, and state that instructors set acceptable levels of GAI use in their classrooms.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: faculty_written_course_gai_policy_levels
Original evidence
Evidence 1The goal was to produce a series of clear and reasonable criteria faculty could use if they deemed necessary for their courses... the GAI task force recommends that faculty include their own written policy regarding students' GAI use... Instructors have academic freedom to set acceptable levels of GAI use in their classroom.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.
Official sources
3 source attribution
AI at S&T - Information Technology | Missouri S&T
it.mst.edu
Faculty Resources for Academic Integrity - Dean of Students | Missouri S&T
dos.mst.edu
GAI Guidelines - Center for Advancing Faculty Excellence | Missouri S&T
cafe.mst.edu
Change log
Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.
View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.
Corrections and missing evidence
Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.
If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.