Policy presence
Missouri University of Science and Technology has 4 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Rolla, United States
Missouri University of Science and Technology has 4 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
No source-backed public claim about AI disclosure or acknowledgement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about disclosing, acknowledging, citing, or declaring AI use.
Missouri University of Science and Technology has 4 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: conditionally_allowed.
Missouri University of Science and Technology has 4 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: conditionally_allowed.
Missouri University of Science and Technology has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Missouri University of Science and Technology has 1 source-backed public claim for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: conditionally_allowed.
Missouri University of Science and Technology has 3 source-backed public claims for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Missouri University of Science and Technology has 4 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Missouri University of Science and Technology has 4 source-backed public claims for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Missouri University of Science and Technology has 1 source-backed public claim for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Missouri University of Science and Technology has 5 source-backed public claims for security and procurement; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
6 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Academic Integrity
Normalized value: coursework_ai_requires_instructor_approval
Original evidence
Evidence 1Using AI tools like ChatGPT in coursework requires instructor approval to align with Missouri S&T's academic integrity policies. Unauthorized use may violate university regulations and be considered plagiarism. To maintain academic honesty, students should clarify AI usage guidelines with their instructors before applying these tools.
Privacy
Normalized value: sensitive_data_requires_approval
Original evidence
Evidence 1Prioritize protecting intellectual property and data over results. Do not utilize AI when dealing with sensitive data, unless approved, such as student information, restricted grant information, unpublished research, or other works in progress.
Teaching
Normalized value: um_system_no_ai_checker_endorsement
Original evidence
Evidence 1The UM system does not endorse nor provide an AI checker. These have been shown to be highly unreliable and biased. Faculty are therefore cautioned against attempting to use this type of software.
Ai Tool Treatment
Normalized value: responsible_ai_guidance_and_approved_tools
Original evidence
Evidence 1The campus encourages the responsible and ethical use of AI by students, faculty, and staff. This page provides guidance on how AI can be integrated into academic and workplace settings, outlines compliance considerations, and highlights approved AI tools currently available for use.
Procurement
Normalized value: approved_software_list_and_it_compliance_review
Original evidence
Evidence 1Although many software titles have AI included, not all are approved for use at S&T. Check the approved software list before using. Missouri S&T's IT teams continually monitor emerging technologies... To meet the Board of Curators technology acquisition policy (BPM 12004), IT Compliance must review and approve each software use case.
Teaching
Normalized value: faculty_written_course_gai_policy_levels
Original evidence
Evidence 1The goal was to produce a series of clear and reasonable criteria faculty could use if they deemed necessary for their courses... the GAI task force recommends that faculty include their own written policy regarding students' GAI use... Instructors have academic freedom to set acceptable levels of GAI use in their classroom.
0 machine or needs-review claim
3 source attribution
it.mst.edu
dos.mst.edu
cafe.mst.edu