Policy presence
Michigan Technological University has 4 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Open, evidence-backed AI policy records for public reuse.
Houghton, United States
Michigan Technological University has 5 source-backed AI policy claims from 4 official source attributions. Review state: agent reviewed; 5 reviewed claims. Last checked May 22, 2026.
v1 public contract
Michigan Technological University has 5 source-backed AI policy claims from 4 official source attributions, including 5 reviewed claims. The record review state is agent reviewed; original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, confidence, and public JSON are preserved for citation. Last checked May 22, 2026. Discovery context: Michigan Technological University is listed as QS 2026 rank 901-950.
As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists Michigan Technological University as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 22, 2026 and last changed on May 22, 2026. The record contains 5 source-backed claims, including 5 reviewed claims, from 4 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/michigan-technological-university.json. The entity-level confidence is 95%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.
This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.
This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.
Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.
Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.
Michigan Technological University has 4 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Michigan Technological University has 1 source-backed public claim for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Michigan Technological University has 4 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Michigan Technological University has 3 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Michigan Technological University has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Michigan Technological University has 1 source-backed public claim for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Michigan Technological University has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: allowed.
Michigan Technological University has 2 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Michigan Technological University has 3 source-backed public claims for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Michigan Technological University has 1 source-backed public claim for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.
5 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Privacy
Normalized value: avoid_tier1_data_with_limited_written-consent_exception
Original evidence
Evidence 1Avoid submitting MTU data classified as tier 1 (confidential or restricted) with AI tools. Where a contract or other legal agreement provides explicit protections to MTU data, tier 1 data may be permissible to be used with an AI tool, but only with the written consent of the Chief Information Officer, Chief Information Security Officer, or General Counsel.
Ai Tool Treatment
Normalized value: disclose_ai_use_when_more_than_25_percent_of_deliverable
Original evidence
Evidence 1Disclose use of AI tools as required by the entity receiving the AI-facilitated content, but in all cases where such use represents a significant component of the final product or deliverable (for the avoidance of doubt, this means more than 25% of the final product/deliverable).
Academic Integrity
Normalized value: prohibited_or_policy_noncompliant_gai_use_is_integrity_violation
Original evidence
Evidence 1Use of generative artificial intelligence technologies (GAI) in ways that are prohibited by the instructor or that do not comport with University Policy 1.20: Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence Tools will also be regarded as an academic integrity violation.
Research
Normalized value: research_ai_use_must_comply_with_sponsor_or_publisher_requirements
Original evidence
Evidence 1It is the University's policy for Michigan Tech faculty, staff, and students to comply with funding sponsor or publisher requirements for the use of generative AI tools in funding applications or reporting of research results.
Teaching
Normalized value: syllabus_templates_general_conditional_prohibition
Original evidence
Evidence 1The AI Working Group at Michigan Technological University has developed the following syllabus templates to guide instructors in establishing generative artificial intelligence (GAI) use policies within their courses. These templates, categorized into three tiers-General Permission, Conditional Permission, and Prohibition-are adaptable based on individual course requirements.
0 machine or needs-review claim
Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.
4 source attribution
mtu.edu
mtu.edu
mtu.edu
mtu.edu
Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.
View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.
Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.
If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.