Houghton, United States

Michigan Technological University

Record status

Policy statusReviewed evidence-backed recordReview: Agent reviewedClaim coverage5 reviewedEvidence-backed claims5Reviewed5Candidate0Official sources4Source languageenPublic JSON/api/public/v1/universities/michigan-technological-university.json

Policy profile

Coverage score100/100Coverage labelbroad public coverageReview: Machine candidateAnalysis confidence79%

AI disclosure

Michigan Technological University has 1 source-backed public claim for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: recommended.

RecommendedMachine candidateConfidence80%Evidence1Sources1

Privacy and data entry

Michigan Technological University has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.

RestrictedMachine candidateConfidence81%Evidence1Sources1

Academic integrity

Michigan Technological University has 1 source-backed public claim for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: restricted.

RestrictedMachine candidateConfidence80%Evidence1Sources1

Approved tools

Michigan Technological University has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: allowed.

AllowedMachine candidateConfidence80%Evidence1Sources1

Research guidance

Michigan Technological University has 1 source-backed public claim for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.

RecommendedMachine candidateConfidence78%Evidence1Sources1

Security and procurement

No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

AI tools

Derived tool records1

AI tools

Michigan Technological University

Tool
AI tools
About
Not specified
Access
Not specified
Cost
Not specified
Availability
Unknown
Review
Agent reviewed

Evidence-backed claims

5 reviewed evidence-backed public claim

Privacy

Michigan Tech Policy 1.20 tells university affiliates to avoid submitting tier 1 confidential or restricted MTU data to AI tools, with limited use only when explicit contractual protections exist and written consent is obtained from the CIO, CISO, or General Counsel.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%

Normalized value: avoid_tier1_data_with_limited_written-consent_exception

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Avoid submitting MTU data classified as tier 1 (confidential or restricted) with AI tools. Where a contract or other legal agreement provides explicit protections to MTU data, tier 1 data may be permissible to be used with an AI tool, but only with the written consent of the Chief Information Officer, Chief Information Security Officer, or General Counsel.

Ai Tool Treatment

Michigan Tech Policy 1.20 requires AI tool use to be disclosed when the use represents a significant component of the final product or deliverable, defined by the policy as more than 25%.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%

Normalized value: disclose_ai_use_when_more_than_25_percent_of_deliverable

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Disclose use of AI tools as required by the entity receiving the AI-facilitated content, but in all cases where such use represents a significant component of the final product or deliverable (for the avoidance of doubt, this means more than 25% of the final product/deliverable).

Academic Integrity

Michigan Tech's academic integrity policy treats use of generative AI technologies as an academic integrity violation when the use is prohibited by the instructor or does not comply with University Policy 1.20.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%

Normalized value: prohibited_or_policy_noncompliant_gai_use_is_integrity_violation

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Use of generative artificial intelligence technologies (GAI) in ways that are prohibited by the instructor or that do not comport with University Policy 1.20: Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence Tools will also be regarded as an academic integrity violation.

Research

Michigan Tech's research AI guidance says faculty, staff, and students must comply with funding sponsor or publisher requirements for generative AI use in funding applications or research-result reporting.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%

Normalized value: research_ai_use_must_comply_with_sponsor_or_publisher_requirements

Original evidence

Evidence 1
It is the University's policy for Michigan Tech faculty, staff, and students to comply with funding sponsor or publisher requirements for the use of generative AI tools in funding applications or reporting of research results.

Teaching

Michigan Tech Academic Affairs provides AI Working Group syllabus templates for instructors, organized into General Permission, Conditional Permission, and Prohibition tiers for course-level generative AI use policies.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%

Normalized value: syllabus_templates_general_conditional_prohibition

Original evidence

Evidence 1
The AI Working Group at Michigan Technological University has developed the following syllabus templates to guide instructors in establishing generative artificial intelligence (GAI) use policies within their courses. These templates, categorized into three tiers-General Permission, Conditional Permission, and Prohibition-are adaptable based on individual course requirements.

Candidate claims

0 machine or needs-review claim

Official sources

4 source attribution

Change log

Last checkedMay 22, 2026Last changedMay 22, 2026Open change log

Corrections

Back to universities