Policy presence
Kazan (Volga region) Federal University has 2 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Kazan, Russia
Kazan (Volga region) Federal University has 2 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
No source-backed public claim about AI disclosure or acknowledgement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about disclosing, acknowledging, citing, or declaring AI use.
Kazan (Volga region) Federal University has 2 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: conditionally_allowed.
Kazan (Volga region) Federal University has 2 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
No source-backed public claim about privacy or data-entry restrictions is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about personal, confidential, sensitive, regulated, or student data entry into AI tools.
No source-backed public claim about academic-integrity treatment of AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about AI use under academic integrity, misconduct, dishonesty, plagiarism, or cheating rules.
No source-backed public claim identifying approved or licensed AI tools is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence that identifies institutionally approved, licensed, procured, or enterprise AI tools.
No source-backed public claim naming a specific AI service is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence naming a specific AI service.
Kazan (Volga region) Federal University has 2 source-backed public claims for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
No tool-level evidence is published for this record yet. Broad AI tool mentions are not expanded into named tool conclusions.
3 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Teaching
Normalized value: ai_included_in_digital_departments_training_programs
Original evidence
Evidence 1эффективно использовать генеративный искусственный интеллект (ИИ) для решения профессиональных задач (создание контента, анализ информации)... применять искусственный интеллект в обучении: использовать AI-сервисы для генерации и обработки контента, анализа успеваемости и персонализации образовательных траекторий.
Localized display only
The page lists AI and generative AI competencies in Digital Departments training programs.
Source Status
Normalized value: no_central_binding_ai_policy_found_in_official_discovery
Original evidence
Evidence 1Доклад был посвящен результатам исследований и экспериментов по использованию ИИ-ассистентов в разработке ПО, проводившихся сотрудниками и студентами лаборатории Smart Education Lab ИТИС в 2024-2025 гг.
Localized display only
The article frames the material as research and experiments by ITIS staff and students, not as a university-wide policy.
Original evidence
Evidence 2Программа предназначена для студентов 2 курса и старше следующих направлений подготовки... В ходе обучения слушатель научится... использовать искусственный интеллект в образовании: писать промты, работать с API LLM, разрабатывать умных чат-ботов;
Localized display only
The official Digital Departments page presents AI as course/program content for eligible students, not a university-wide policy rule.
Teaching
Normalized value: limited_itis_article_reports_caution_for_ai_in_basic_programming_instruction
Original evidence
Evidence 1Поможет временный отказ от инструментов генерации кода для обучения базовому программированию, стимулирование у студентов способности к проектированию решения без ИИ... При этом важно найти баланс использования нейросетей...
Localized display only
The ITIS article reports a cautious teaching view for basic programming, while emphasizing balance for later AI use.
0 machine or needs-review claim
2 source attribution
kpfu.ru
ck.kpfu.ru