Policy presence
Inha University has 2 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Incheon, South Korea
Inha University
Inha University has 3 source-backed AI policy claims from 2 official source attributions. Review state: agent reviewed; 3 reviewed claims. Last checked May 17, 2026.
Inha University AI policy short answer
v1 public contract
Inha University has 3 source-backed AI policy claims from 2 official source attributions, including 3 reviewed claims. The record review state is agent reviewed; original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, confidence, and public JSON are preserved for citation. Last checked May 17, 2026. Discovery context: Inha University is listed as QS 2026 rank =643.
Citation-ready summary
As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists Inha University as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 17, 2026 and last changed on May 17, 2026. The record contains 3 source-backed claims, including 3 reviewed claims, from 2 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/inha-university.json. The entity-level confidence is 91%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy signals in this record
- Evidence includes Academic integrity claims.
- Evidence includes AI tool treatment claims.
- Named AI services detected in public claims: ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini.
- Teaching, assessment, coursework, or syllabus-related language appears in the public claim text.
Review: Agent reviewed
This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.
This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy profile
Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.
Review: Machine candidate
Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.
Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.
AI disclosure
Inha University has 1 source-backed public claim for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Coursework
Inha University has 2 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: allowed.
Exams
Inha University has 3 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: allowed.
Privacy and data entry
No source-backed public claim about privacy or data-entry restrictions is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about personal, confidential, sensitive, regulated, or student data entry into AI tools.
Academic integrity
Inha University has 2 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Approved tools
Inha University has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: allowed.
Named AI services
Inha University has 1 source-backed public claim for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: allowed.
Teaching guidance
No source-backed public claim about teaching guidance is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about instructor, classroom, assessment-design, or syllabus guidance.
Research guidance
No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.
Security and procurement
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.
Evidence-backed claims
3 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Academic Integrity
For ICAC 2026, Inha's official notice lists misconduct as receiving direct help from outside the organizers, interfering with other participants, sharing answers, code, or prompts, attempting prompt injection or grading-system hacking, or other organizer-recognized cheating.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: event_specific_ai_challenge_misconduct_rules
Original evidence
Evidence 1운영진 외 외부의 직접적 도움을 받는 경우 ... 답안·코드·프롬프트를 공유하는 경우 ... 프롬프트 인젝션 등 채점 시스템 해킹 시도
Localized display only
The misconduct section covers outside direct help, sharing answers/code/prompts, and prompt-injection or grading-system hacking attempts.
Ai Tool Treatment
Inha University's official ICAC 2026 recruitment notice says Inha undergraduate participants in that AI challenge may freely use generative-AI services such as Upstage Document Parse, Solar Pro3, ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude to solve the event's campus-document problems.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: event_specific_genai_tool_use_allowed_for_icac_2026
Original evidence
Evidence 1Upstage Document Parse · Solar Pro3, ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude 등 생성형 AI를 자유롭게 활용하여 캠퍼스 속 실전 문서 문제를 해결
Localized display only
The notice says participants may freely use generative AI services such as Upstage Document Parse, Solar Pro3, ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude to solve campus document problems.
Academic Integrity
Inha University's 2025 academic guide says students disciplined for exam misconduct receive grade invalidation consequences ranging from an F in the affected course to F grades for all courses in the semester, depending on the disciplinary sanction.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: general_exam_misconduct_grade_invalidation_sanctions
Original evidence
Evidence 1시험부정행위로 징계처분을 받은 학생은 ... 근신 : 부정행위를 한 교과목만 ‘F’ 처리 ... 유기정학 30일 이상 및 무기정학 : 당해 학기 모든 성적 ‘F’ 처리
Localized display only
The academic guide says grade invalidation for exam misconduct ranges from F in the affected course to F grades for all courses in the semester.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.
Official sources
2 source attribution
2025 학사 안내
inha.ac.kr
2026년 SW중심대학 AI 문제해결 챌린지 「ICAC 2026」참여자 모집 (4.28.~5.8.)
inha.ac.kr
Change log
Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.
View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.
Corrections and missing evidence
Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.
If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.