Incheon, South Korea

Inha University

Record status

Policy statusReviewed evidence-backed recordReview: Agent reviewedClaim coverage3 reviewedEvidence-backed claims3Reviewed3Candidate0Official sources2Source languagekoPublic JSON/api/public/v1/universities/inha-university.json

Policy profile

Coverage score75/100Coverage labelbroad public coverageReview: Machine candidateAnalysis confidence77%

AI disclosure

Inha University has 1 source-backed public claim for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: recommended.

RecommendedMachine candidateConfidence77%Evidence1Sources1

Privacy and data entry

No source-backed public claim about privacy or data-entry restrictions is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about personal, confidential, sensitive, regulated, or student data entry into AI tools.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Approved tools

Inha University has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: allowed.

AllowedMachine candidateConfidence77%Evidence1Sources1

Named AI services

Inha University has 1 source-backed public claim for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: allowed.

AllowedMachine candidateConfidence77%Evidence1Sources1

Teaching guidance

No source-backed public claim about teaching guidance is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about instructor, classroom, assessment-design, or syllabus guidance.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Research guidance

No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Security and procurement

No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

AI tools

Derived tool records3

ChatGPT

Inha University

Tool
ChatGPT
About
Not specified
Access
Not specified
Cost
Not specified
Availability
Unknown
Review
Agent reviewed

Claude

Inha University

Tool
Claude
About
Not specified
Access
Not specified
Cost
Not specified
Availability
Unknown
Review
Agent reviewed

Gemini

Inha University

Tool
Gemini
About
Not specified
Access
Not specified
Cost
Not specified
Availability
Unknown
Review
Agent reviewed

Evidence-backed claims

3 reviewed evidence-backed public claim

Academic Integrity

For ICAC 2026, Inha's official notice lists misconduct as receiving direct help from outside the organizers, interfering with other participants, sharing answers, code, or prompts, attempting prompt injection or grading-system hacking, or other organizer-recognized cheating.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence91%

Normalized value: event_specific_ai_challenge_misconduct_rules

Original evidence

Evidence 1
운영진 외 외부의 직접적 도움을 받는 경우 ... 답안·코드·프롬프트를 공유하는 경우 ... 프롬프트 인젝션 등 채점 시스템 해킹 시도

Localized display only

The misconduct section covers outside direct help, sharing answers/code/prompts, and prompt-injection or grading-system hacking attempts.

Ai Tool Treatment

Inha University's official ICAC 2026 recruitment notice says Inha undergraduate participants in that AI challenge may freely use generative-AI services such as Upstage Document Parse, Solar Pro3, ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude to solve the event's campus-document problems.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%

Normalized value: event_specific_genai_tool_use_allowed_for_icac_2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Upstage Document Parse · Solar Pro3, ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude 등 생성형 AI를 자유롭게 활용하여 캠퍼스 속 실전 문서 문제를 해결

Localized display only

The notice says participants may freely use generative AI services such as Upstage Document Parse, Solar Pro3, ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude to solve campus document problems.

Academic Integrity

Inha University's 2025 academic guide says students disciplined for exam misconduct receive grade invalidation consequences ranging from an F in the affected course to F grades for all courses in the semester, depending on the disciplinary sanction.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%

Normalized value: general_exam_misconduct_grade_invalidation_sanctions

Original evidence

Evidence 1
시험부정행위로 징계처분을 받은 학생은 ... 근신 : 부정행위를 한 교과목만 ‘F’ 처리 ... 유기정학 30일 이상 및 무기정학 : 당해 학기 모든 성적 ‘F’ 처리

Localized display only

The academic guide says grade invalidation for exam misconduct ranges from F in the affected course to F grades for all courses in the semester.

Candidate claims

0 machine or needs-review claim

Official sources

2 source attribution

Change log

Last checkedMay 17, 2026Last changedMay 17, 2026Open change log

Corrections

Back to universities