Policy presence
Inha University has 2 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Incheon, South Korea
Inha University has 2 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Inha University has 1 source-backed public claim for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Inha University has 2 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: allowed.
Inha University has 3 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: allowed.
No source-backed public claim about privacy or data-entry restrictions is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about personal, confidential, sensitive, regulated, or student data entry into AI tools.
Inha University has 2 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Inha University has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: allowed.
Inha University has 1 source-backed public claim for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: allowed.
No source-backed public claim about teaching guidance is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about instructor, classroom, assessment-design, or syllabus guidance.
No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
3 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Academic Integrity
Normalized value: event_specific_ai_challenge_misconduct_rules
Original evidence
Evidence 1운영진 외 외부의 직접적 도움을 받는 경우 ... 답안·코드·프롬프트를 공유하는 경우 ... 프롬프트 인젝션 등 채점 시스템 해킹 시도
Localized display only
The misconduct section covers outside direct help, sharing answers/code/prompts, and prompt-injection or grading-system hacking attempts.
Ai Tool Treatment
Normalized value: event_specific_genai_tool_use_allowed_for_icac_2026
Original evidence
Evidence 1Upstage Document Parse · Solar Pro3, ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude 등 생성형 AI를 자유롭게 활용하여 캠퍼스 속 실전 문서 문제를 해결
Localized display only
The notice says participants may freely use generative AI services such as Upstage Document Parse, Solar Pro3, ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude to solve campus document problems.
Academic Integrity
Normalized value: general_exam_misconduct_grade_invalidation_sanctions
Original evidence
Evidence 1시험부정행위로 징계처분을 받은 학생은 ... 근신 : 부정행위를 한 교과목만 ‘F’ 처리 ... 유기정학 30일 이상 및 무기정학 : 당해 학기 모든 성적 ‘F’ 처리
Localized display only
The academic guide says grade invalidation for exam misconduct ranges from F in the affected course to F grades for all courses in the semester.
0 machine or needs-review claim
2 source attribution
inha.ac.kr
inha.ac.kr