Policy presence
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee (IITR) has 2 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Open, evidence-backed AI policy records for public reuse.
Roorkee, India
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee (IITR) is listed as QS 2026 rank =339. Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee (IITR) has 2 source-backed AI policy claim records from 2 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
v1 public contract
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee (IITR) is listed as QS 2026 rank =339. Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee (IITR) has 2 source-backed AI policy claim records from 2 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee (IITR) as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 16, 2026 and last changed on May 16, 2026. The record contains 2 source-backed claims, including 2 reviewed claims, from 2 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/indian-institute-of-technology-roorkee-iitr.json. The entity-level confidence is 91%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.
This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.
This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.
Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.
Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee (IITR) has 2 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
No source-backed public claim about AI disclosure or acknowledgement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about disclosing, acknowledging, citing, or declaring AI use.
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee (IITR) has 2 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: required.
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee (IITR) has 1 source-backed public claim for exams; deterministic analysis status: required.
No source-backed public claim about privacy or data-entry restrictions is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about personal, confidential, sensitive, regulated, or student data entry into AI tools.
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee (IITR) has 1 source-backed public claim for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: required.
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee (IITR) has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: allowed.
No source-backed public claim naming a specific AI service is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence naming a specific AI service.
No source-backed public claim about teaching guidance is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about instructor, classroom, assessment-design, or syllabus guidance.
No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.
2 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Academic Integrity
Normalized value: Academic ethics policy addresses plagiarism and pre-submission plagiarism checks; the source is not AI-specific.
Original evidence
Evidence 1Plagiarism is often considered as owning of others ideas, conclusions, code, data, design, figure, etc., without their permission or due acknowledgement. Self-plagiarism occurs when the same word or a significant part of the work is reproduced again. The extent and type of plagiarism can be variable and sometimes it can also be unintentional, however, it is unacceptable. IIT Roorkee observes "zero tolerance" against those indulging in plagiarism.
Localized display only
The policy defines plagiarism broadly, says it is unacceptable even when unintentional, and says IIT Roorkee observes zero tolerance against plagiarism.
Source Status
Normalized value: AI-related public source found; no institutional AI-use policy located in this run.
Original evidence
Evidence 1Generative AI & Large Language Model Engineering using Python. In today's AI-driven world, Generative AI and Large Language Models (LLMs) are at the forefront of innovation, powering applications ranging from chatbots to recommendation engines, speech recognition, and intelligent automation. Python is the most widely used programming language in the world of Gen-AI and Data Science owing to its simplicity, versatility, and a vast ecosystem of powerful libraries.
Localized display only
The official IITR iHUB page is a Generative AI and LLM Engineering course page, not a public institutional AI-use policy.
0 machine or needs-review claim
Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.
2 source attribution
iitr.ac.in
tih.iitr.ac.in
Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.
View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.
Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.
If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.