Adelaide, Australia

Flinders University

Record status

Policy statusReviewed evidence-backed recordReview: Agent reviewedClaim coverage5 reviewedEvidence-backed claims5Reviewed5Candidate0Official sources4Source languageenPublic JSON/api/public/v1/universities/flinders-university.json

Policy profile

Coverage score100/100Coverage labelbroad public coverageReview: Machine candidateAnalysis confidence79%

Privacy and data entry

Flinders University has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: recommended.

RecommendedMachine candidateConfidence78%Evidence1Sources1

Approved tools

Flinders University has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: recommended.

RecommendedMachine candidateConfidence78%Evidence1Sources1

Research guidance

No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Security and procurement

No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

AI tools

Derived tool records0

No tool-level evidence is published for this record yet. Broad AI tool mentions are not expanded into named tool conclusions.

Evidence-backed claims

5 reviewed evidence-backed public claim

Academic Integrity

Flinders states that students are responsible for using AI consistently with University, course, topic, assessment, and academic integrity requirements, including acknowledging generative AI use.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%

Normalized value: student_ai_use_must_follow_requirements_and_acknowledgement

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Students have specific responsibility to: Use AI models in ethical and responsible ways that are consistent with the University’s assessment and academic integrity policies and procedures, and the terms of use of the AI providers.

Academic Integrity

Flinders' student academic integrity page states that misusing AI tools includes using tools such as ChatGPT, Gemini, or DALL-E without topic coordinator permission and without appropriate acknowledgement or citations.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%

Normalized value: unauthorized_or_unacknowledged_ai_use_is_ai_misuse

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Misusing Artificial Intelligence (AI) Tools includes the use of AI tools such as ChatGPT, Gemini, or DALL-E without the permission of your topic coordinator and without appropriate acknowledgement or citations.

Teaching

Flinders provides staff with AI assessment scale template instructions that range from no AI permitted through prompted, assisted, task-completion, and full AI use, with acknowledgement expectations attached to permitted use.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%

Normalized value: assessment_scale_template_instructions_with_acknowledgement

Original evidence

Evidence 1
For this assessment task, students are permitted to use in-built generative AI such as slide design or grammatical/editing but are required to generate their own responses in line with conditions and expectations of the task outlined in the instructions.

Ai Tool Treatment

Flinders University's AI position statement says AI should be used responsibly, ethically, and transparently, with attention to privacy, security, stakeholder needs, and ongoing evaluation.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%

Normalized value: responsible_ethical_transparent_ai_use

Original evidence

Evidence 1
We also recognise the challenges of this rapidly evolving technology and are committed to using AI in an ethical and transparent manner, consistent with our values of integrity, courage, and excellence.

Teaching

Flinders' staff good-practice guide recommends that staff take steps to design for academic integrity and artificial intelligence.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%

Normalized value: staff_guidance_recommends_designing_for_academic_integrity_and_ai

Original evidence

Evidence 1
We recommend that you take the following steps to design for academic integrity and AI.

Candidate claims

0 machine or needs-review claim

Official sources

4 source attribution

Change log

Last checkedMay 16, 2026Last changedMay 16, 2026Open change log

Corrections

Back to universities