Policy presence
Flinders University has 1 source-backed public claim for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Adelaide, Australia
Flinders University has 1 source-backed public claim for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Flinders University has 3 source-backed public claims for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: required.
Flinders University has 5 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: required.
Flinders University has 5 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: required.
Flinders University has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Flinders University has 3 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: required.
Flinders University has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Flinders University has 2 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: required.
Flinders University has 2 source-backed public claims for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
No tool-level evidence is published for this record yet. Broad AI tool mentions are not expanded into named tool conclusions.
5 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Academic Integrity
Normalized value: student_ai_use_must_follow_requirements_and_acknowledgement
Original evidence
Evidence 1Students have specific responsibility to: Use AI models in ethical and responsible ways that are consistent with the University’s assessment and academic integrity policies and procedures, and the terms of use of the AI providers.
Academic Integrity
Normalized value: unauthorized_or_unacknowledged_ai_use_is_ai_misuse
Original evidence
Evidence 1Misusing Artificial Intelligence (AI) Tools includes the use of AI tools such as ChatGPT, Gemini, or DALL-E without the permission of your topic coordinator and without appropriate acknowledgement or citations.
Teaching
Normalized value: assessment_scale_template_instructions_with_acknowledgement
Original evidence
Evidence 1For this assessment task, students are permitted to use in-built generative AI such as slide design or grammatical/editing but are required to generate their own responses in line with conditions and expectations of the task outlined in the instructions.
Ai Tool Treatment
Normalized value: responsible_ethical_transparent_ai_use
Original evidence
Evidence 1We also recognise the challenges of this rapidly evolving technology and are committed to using AI in an ethical and transparent manner, consistent with our values of integrity, courage, and excellence.
Teaching
Normalized value: staff_guidance_recommends_designing_for_academic_integrity_and_ai
Original evidence
Evidence 1We recommend that you take the following steps to design for academic integrity and AI.
0 machine or needs-review claim
4 source attribution
students.flinders.edu.au
staff.flinders.edu.au
staff.flinders.edu.au
students.flinders.edu.au