Policy presence
No source-backed public AI policy or guidance record is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain a source-backed claim that establishes a policy or guidance source.
Prague, Czechia
Czech University of Life Sciences in Prague
Czech University of Life Sciences in Prague has 3 source-backed AI policy claims from 1 official source attribution. Review state: agent reviewed; 3 reviewed claims. Last checked May 19, 2026.
Czech University of Life Sciences in Prague AI policy short answer
v1 public contract
Czech University of Life Sciences in Prague has 3 source-backed AI policy claims from 1 official source attribution, including 3 reviewed claims. The record review state is agent reviewed; original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, confidence, and public JSON are preserved for citation. Last checked May 19, 2026. Discovery context: Czech University of Life Sciences in Prague is listed as QS 2026 rank 761-770.
Citation-ready summary
As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists Czech University of Life Sciences in Prague as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 19, 2026 and last changed on May 19, 2026. The record contains 3 source-backed claims, including 3 reviewed claims, from 1 official source attribution. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/czech-university-of-life-sciences-in-prague.json. The entity-level confidence is 92%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy signals in this record
- Evidence includes Privacy claims.
- Evidence includes Academic integrity claims.
- Evidence includes AI tool treatment claims.
- No specific AI service name is highlighted by the current public claim text.
- Privacy, sensitive-data, or security language appears in the public claim text.
Review: Agent reviewed
This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.
This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy profile
Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.
Review: Machine candidate
Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.
Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.
AI disclosure
Czech University of Life Sciences in Prague has 1 source-backed public claim for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: required.
Coursework
Czech University of Life Sciences in Prague has 3 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Exams
Czech University of Life Sciences in Prague has 2 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Privacy and data entry
Czech University of Life Sciences in Prague has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Academic integrity
Czech University of Life Sciences in Prague has 1 source-backed public claim for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: required.
Approved tools
Czech University of Life Sciences in Prague has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Named AI services
Czech University of Life Sciences in Prague has 2 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Teaching guidance
Czech University of Life Sciences in Prague has 3 source-backed public claims for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Research guidance
Czech University of Life Sciences in Prague has 1 source-backed public claim for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Security and procurement
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.
Evidence-backed claims
3 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Privacy
For FAPPZ CZU final theses, the 2026 dean's instruction says unpublished data, sensitive or personal data, and confidential information must not be entered into AI tools.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: faculty_final_theses_no_sensitive_data_in_ai_tools
Original evidence
Evidence 1Do AI nastroju nesmi byt zadavana: a) nepublikovana data; b) citlive nebo osobni udaje; c) duverne informace ziskane v ramci spoluprace s externimi partnery, grantovych projektu, firem nebo internich fakultnich vyzkumu.
Localized display only
Unpublished data, sensitive or personal data, and confidential information from partners, projects, companies, or internal faculty research must not be entered into AI tools.
Academic Integrity
For FAPPZ CZU final theses, the 2026 dean's instruction requires students to state whether AI tools were used and to list the specific tools if AI materially affects thesis content or wording.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: faculty_final_theses_ai_disclosure_required
Original evidence
Evidence 1Student je povinen: a) uvest, zda pri zpracovani zaverecne prace vyuzil nastroje AI; b) uvest konkretni pouzite nastroje AI. Pokud AI zasahuje do obsahu nebo formulace casti zaverecne prace, je student povinen tento prispevek transparentne priznat.
Localized display only
The student must state whether AI tools were used and list the specific AI tools; if AI affects thesis content or wording, that contribution must be transparently acknowledged.
Ai Tool Treatment
For FAPPZ CZU final theses, the 2026 dean's instruction allows AI tools only as support and says AI must not replace the student's own expert work, analysis, interpretation, or argumentation.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: faculty_final_theses_ai_support_only
Original evidence
Evidence 1AI lze vyuzivat pouze jako podpurny nastroj pri zpracovani zaverecne prace. Student je povinen pri zpracovani zaverecne prace pracovat samostatne a prokazat vlastni odborne schopnosti. AI nesmi nahrazovat klicove kompetence studenta, jako jsou odborna analyza, interpretace dat a formulace zaverecnych argumentu.
Localized display only
AI may be used only as a support tool for final thesis work; the student must work independently and AI must not replace expert analysis, data interpretation, or final arguments.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.
Official sources
1 source attribution
Pokyn dekanky c. 01/2026: Pokyny k vyuzivani nastroju umele inteligence pri zpracovani zaverecnych praci na FAPPZ CZU
af.czu.cz
Change log
Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.
View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.
Corrections and missing evidence
Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.
If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.