Ottawa, Canada

Carleton University

Record status

Policy statusReviewed evidence-backed recordReview: Agent reviewedClaim coverage4 reviewedEvidence-backed claims4Reviewed4Candidate0Official sources4Source languageenPublic JSON/api/public/v1/universities/carleton-university.json

Policy profile

Coverage score100/100Coverage labelbroad public coverageReview: Machine candidateAnalysis confidence79%

Research guidance

No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

AI tools

Derived tool records0

No tool-level evidence is published for this record yet. Broad AI tool mentions are not expanded into named tool conclusions.

Evidence-backed claims

4 reviewed evidence-backed public claim

Procurement

Carleton identifies Microsoft Copilot as its only approved GenAI platform because it offers Enterprise Data Protection and has completed the university's Data Protection Risk Assessment process.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%

Normalized value: microsoft_copilot_only_approved_genai_platform_dpra

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Microsoft Copilot is Carleton’s only approved GenAI platform because it offers Enterprise Data Protection and has successfully completed the university’s Data Protection Risk Assessment (DPRA) process.

Academic Integrity

Carleton guidance says using AI tools to generate assignment content and presenting it as one's own work, or copying or paraphrasing AI-produced content without proper citations and instructor consent, is considered a violation of academic integrity.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%

Normalized value: ai_generated_work_without_citation_or_consent_academic_integrity_violation

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Using AI tools to generate content for assignments and presenting it as one’s own original work, as well as copying or paraphrasing the content produced by AI tools without proper citations and the instructor’s consent, are both considered to be in violation of academic integrity.

Privacy

Carleton instructor guidance says confidential, sensitive, or institutional data should use only Carleton-approved AI tools, and discourages adopting third-party tools that have not been cleared for privacy and security by the university.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%

Normalized value: approved_ai_tools_for_sensitive_institutional_data

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Use only Carleton-approved AI tools for confidential, sensitive or institutional data in line with the Data Protection and Risk Management Policy and the AI Framework for Carleton University.

Teaching

Carleton instructor guidance recommends syllabus and assignment instructions that specify how AI tools should be used, including clear parameters for how a tool may and may not be used.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence88%

Normalized value: course_specific_ai_use_parameters_recommended

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Include detailed instructions for individual tasks that provide clear parameters for how the tool may and may not be used.

Candidate claims

0 machine or needs-review claim

Official sources

4 source attribution

Change log

Last checkedMay 20, 2026Last changedMay 20, 2026Open change log

Corrections

Back to universities