Policy presence
American University of Central Asia has 3 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan
American University of Central Asia has 3 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
No source-backed public claim about AI disclosure or acknowledgement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about disclosing, acknowledging, citing, or declaring AI use.
American University of Central Asia has 2 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: required.
American University of Central Asia has 3 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
No source-backed public claim about privacy or data-entry restrictions is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about personal, confidential, sensitive, regulated, or student data entry into AI tools.
American University of Central Asia has 1 source-backed public claim for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
No source-backed public claim identifying approved or licensed AI tools is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence that identifies institutionally approved, licensed, procured, or enterprise AI tools.
No source-backed public claim naming a specific AI service is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence naming a specific AI service.
American University of Central Asia has 2 source-backed public claims for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
No tool-level evidence is published for this record yet. Broad AI tool mentions are not expanded into named tool conclusions.
3 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Teaching
Normalized value: ai_policy_statement_and_code_link_required_in_program_syllabi
Original evidence
Evidence 1In addition, such statement and the link https://auca.kg/en/code_of_conduct1/ to the Code of Student Rights, Responsibilities, and Conduct shall be a mandatory component in every academic program syllabus of AUCA.
Teaching
Normalized value: course_level_instructor_ai_policy_allowed_with_syllabus_notice
Original evidence
Evidence 1Instructors can set individual policies on regulating the utility of generative AI and other tools in their courses provided they: Set clear policies, whether permitting or prohibiting some or all tools; Communicate them clearly in their individual course syllabi.
Academic Integrity
Normalized value: ai_referenced_in_plagiarism_policy_and_prohibited_exam_resources
Original evidence
Evidence 1Usage of AI can be found in the AUCA AI Policy. 2.3. Cheating. This involves using prohibited resources during a proctored exam, including but not limited to cheat sheets, notes, books, internet, AI, instant messaging services or other students.
0 machine or needs-review claim
2 source attribution
auca.kg
auca.kg