Artificial intelligence tools can be used to generate content for the graduation thesis in case: a) it is not related to the skills and knowledge that the student is required to demonstrate ... c) it is authorized or supported by the study program ... The use of such tools is also not allowed for the formulation of the goal, tasks, and conclusions of the thesis.
RTU FCSITE graduation-thesis guidelines allow artificial-intelligence-generated thesis content only in limited cases and state that use is not allowed for thesis goals, tasks, conclusions, or original solution content.
claim-rtu-fcsite-thesis-ai-limits
Section 11.2, Unreferenced use of content generated by an artificial intelligence tool
Correct referencing methods regarding the content generated by artificial intelligence tools are given in Appendix 7 of these guidelines. In the appendices to the graduation thesis, the student should include a screenshot of the response provided by the artificial intelligence tool.
RTU FCSITE graduation-thesis guidelines give a reference-formatting category for generative artificial intelligence tools and say a screenshot of the artificial-intelligence tool response should be included in the thesis appendices.
claim-rtu-fcsite-generative-ai-referencing
Section 11.2 and Appendix 7, Generative Artificial Intelligence Tools
Artificial intelligence tools can be used to generate content for the graduation thesis in case: a) it is not related to the skills and knowledge that the student is required to demonstrate ... c) it is authorized or supported by the study program ... The use of such tools is also not allowed for the formulation of the goal, tasks, and conclusions of the thesis.
RTU FCSITE graduation-thesis guidelines allow artificial-intelligence-generated thesis content only in limited cases and state that use is not allowed for thesis goals, tasks, conclusions, or original solution content.
claim-rtu-fcsite-thesis-ai-limits
Section 11.2, Unreferenced use of content generated by an artificial intelligence tool
Correct referencing methods regarding the content generated by artificial intelligence tools are given in Appendix 7 of these guidelines. In the appendices to the graduation thesis, the student should include a screenshot of the response provided by the artificial intelligence tool.
RTU FCSITE graduation-thesis guidelines give a reference-formatting category for generative artificial intelligence tools and say a screenshot of the artificial-intelligence tool response should be included in the thesis appendices.
claim-rtu-fcsite-generative-ai-referencing
Section 11.2 and Appendix 7, Generative Artificial Intelligence Tools
The Journal "Scriptus Manet" mandates the transparent disclosure of any utilization of artificial intelligence (AI) tools in manuscript preparation ... The utilization of AI tools for the generation of scholarly content, encompassing the development of ideas, arguments, interpretations, data, or conclusions, is prohibited.
The RTU-hosted Scriptus Manet journal policy requires transparent disclosure of AI-tool use in manuscript preparation, prohibits AI tools from generating scholarly content such as ideas, arguments, interpretations, data, or conclusions, and allows auxiliary technical uses such as editing, translation, corpus analysis, and visualization.
claim-rtu-scriptus-ai-manuscripts
Policy on the Utilization of Artificial Intelligence
The Journal "Scriptus Manet" mandates the transparent disclosure of any utilization of artificial intelligence (AI) tools in manuscript preparation ... The utilization of AI tools for the generation of scholarly content, encompassing the development of ideas, arguments, interpretations, data, or conclusions, is prohibited.
The RTU-hosted Scriptus Manet journal policy requires transparent disclosure of AI-tool use in manuscript preparation, prohibits AI tools from generating scholarly content such as ideas, arguments, interpretations, data, or conclusions, and allows auxiliary technical uses such as editing, translation, corpus analysis, and visualization.
claim-rtu-scriptus-ai-manuscripts
Policy on the Utilization of Artificial Intelligence
The author(s) are entirely accountable for the accuracy, originality, and integrity of all content within the submitted manuscript, including sections generated with the aid of AI tools. Authors remain ethically and legally accountable for issues such as plagiarism, data validity, and research transparency, regardless of AI usage.
The RTU-hosted Scriptus Manet journal policy states that authors remain accountable for accuracy, originality, integrity, plagiarism, data validity, and research transparency regardless of AI usage.
claim-rtu-scriptus-ai-author-accountability
Policy on the Utilization of Artificial Intelligence
Artificial intelligence tools can be used to generate content for the graduation thesis in case: a) it is not related to the skills and knowledge that the student is required to demonstrate ... c) it is authorized or supported by the study program ... The use of such tools is also not allowed for the formulation of the goal, tasks, and conclusions of the thesis.
RTU FCSITE graduation-thesis guidelines allow artificial-intelligence-generated thesis content only in limited cases and state that use is not allowed for thesis goals, tasks, conclusions, or original solution content.
claim-rtu-fcsite-thesis-ai-limits
Section 11.2, Unreferenced use of content generated by an artificial intelligence tool
Correct referencing methods regarding the content generated by artificial intelligence tools are given in Appendix 7 of these guidelines. In the appendices to the graduation thesis, the student should include a screenshot of the response provided by the artificial intelligence tool.
RTU FCSITE graduation-thesis guidelines give a reference-formatting category for generative artificial intelligence tools and say a screenshot of the artificial-intelligence tool response should be included in the thesis appendices.
claim-rtu-fcsite-generative-ai-referencing
Section 11.2 and Appendix 7, Generative Artificial Intelligence Tools
The author(s) are entirely accountable for the accuracy, originality, and integrity of all content within the submitted manuscript, including sections generated with the aid of AI tools. Authors remain ethically and legally accountable for issues such as plagiarism, data validity, and research transparency, regardless of AI usage.
The RTU-hosted Scriptus Manet journal policy states that authors remain accountable for accuracy, originality, integrity, plagiarism, data validity, and research transparency regardless of AI usage.
claim-rtu-scriptus-ai-author-accountability
Policy on the Utilization of Artificial Intelligence
No source-backed public claim about teaching guidance is present in this profile.
Teaching guidanceRiga Technical University
Not mentioned in reviewed sources
Status & scope
Scope stated in the cited claims
Original official evidence
No reviewed evidence is included for this topic. This does not establish that no rule exists.
Security and procurement
Not mentioned in reviewed sources
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
Security and procurementRiga Technical University
Not mentioned in reviewed sources
Status & scope
Scope stated in the cited claims
Original official evidence
No reviewed evidence is included for this topic. This does not establish that no rule exists.
Record updatesLast 90 days
Updates to this site's reviewed record, not confirmation that the university changed its policy.
Update records are not available for this page yet.
Reviewed record
Reviewed claims
4 reviewed claims
Academic Integrity 2 reviewed claims
Academic Integrity
RTU FCSITE graduation-thesis guidelines allow artificial-intelligence-generated thesis content only in limited cases and state that use is not allowed for thesis goals, tasks, conclusions, or original solution content.
Artificial intelligence tools can be used to generate content for the graduation thesis in case: a) it is not related to the skills and knowledge that the student is required to demonstrate ... c) it is authorized or supported by the study program ... The use of such tools is also not allowed for the formulation of the goal, tasks, and conclusions of the thesis.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
59eff265…
Retrieved
May 20, 2026
Evidence locator
Section 11.2, Unreferenced use of content generated by an artificial intelligence tool
Academic Integrity
RTU FCSITE graduation-thesis guidelines give a reference-formatting category for generative artificial intelligence tools and say a screenshot of the artificial-intelligence tool response should be included in the thesis appendices.
Correct referencing methods regarding the content generated by artificial intelligence tools are given in Appendix 7 of these guidelines. In the appendices to the graduation thesis, the student should include a screenshot of the response provided by the artificial intelligence tool.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
59eff265…
Retrieved
May 20, 2026
Evidence locator
Section 11.2 and Appendix 7, Generative Artificial Intelligence Tools
Research 2 reviewed claims
Research
The RTU-hosted Scriptus Manet journal policy requires transparent disclosure of AI-tool use in manuscript preparation, prohibits AI tools from generating scholarly content such as ideas, arguments, interpretations, data, or conclusions, and allows auxiliary technical uses such as editing, translation, corpus analysis, and visualization.
The Journal "Scriptus Manet" mandates the transparent disclosure of any utilization of artificial intelligence (AI) tools in manuscript preparation ... The utilization of AI tools for the generation of scholarly content, encompassing the development of ideas, arguments, interpretations, data, or conclusions, is prohibited.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
cd2edb4d…
Retrieved
May 20, 2026
Evidence locator
Policy on the Utilization of Artificial Intelligence
Research
The RTU-hosted Scriptus Manet journal policy states that authors remain accountable for accuracy, originality, integrity, plagiarism, data validity, and research transparency regardless of AI usage.
The author(s) are entirely accountable for the accuracy, originality, and integrity of all content within the submitted manuscript, including sections generated with the aid of AI tools. Authors remain ethically and legally accountable for issues such as plagiarism, data validity, and research transparency, regardless of AI usage.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
cd2edb4d…
Retrieved
May 20, 2026
Evidence locator
Policy on the Utilization of Artificial Intelligence
Source record
Official sources
3 sources
3 official URLs; 3 source attributions and their captured versions retained.
Formatting and Style Guidelines for Graduation Theses
ebooks.rtu.lv
University official source
ebooks.rtu.lv
Hash and captured version
Formatting and Style Guidelines for Graduation Theses · 2026-05-20T01:21:00.000Z
Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.
Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "Riga Technical University AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked May 20, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/riga-technical-university
Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.
Saved from University AI Policy Tracker. This record summarizes the cited sources; it is not an official university statement or assessment permission. Source and review dates are listed above. Hashes identify retained content, not authorization.
Questions students ask
Questions students ask
Can I use AI for my coursework?
Riga Technical University has 2 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
