Verschil van release
Rutgers University–Newark
Geünificeerde trackerdiff voor public-release-20260523-001. De volledige tekst van de bronpagina wordt niet gepubliceerd; korte bewijsfragmenten in de oorspronkelijke taal worden getoond voor citatiecontext.
Geünificeerde diff
Veranderingen in de release-naar-release-tracker gegenereerd uit openbare releasesnapshots.
Rutgers University–Newark public-release-20260523-001 verschil
Eerste getraceerde release.
+37-0
11 # Rutgers University–Newark AI policy diff
22 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
33 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
4+academic_integrity: Rutgers Academic Integrity Policy 10.2.13 applies to all schools and academic units and says students must ensure submitted course, research, or other academic work is their own and created without impermissible technologies, materials, or collaborations.
5+Evidence (en, 30b7a2904557): This Academic Integrity Policy applies to all schools and academic units of Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey. The principles of academic integrity require that a student make sure that all work submitted in a course, academic research, or other activity is the student's own and created without the aid of impermissible technologies, materials, or collaborations.
6+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-20T01:15:00.000Z
47 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
58 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
9+academic_integrity: Rutgers OIT guidance says AI use in academic settings typically varies by discipline, course, or instructor; students should not consider AI tools permissible for coursework unless instructors clearly state or communicate permission.
10+Evidence (en, 6e9ca859b81c): Though AI tools are widely available to students, they should not be considered permissible for coursework unless clearly stated or communicated by instructors. Students are responsible for understanding and abiding by their program and instructors' guidance or rules on the use of AI.
11+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-20T01:08:00.000Z
612 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
713 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
14+research: Rutgers HRPP guidance says researchers using AI in human-subject research must clearly explain in consent forms how AI will be used, what data it will access, and associated risks and limitations.
15+Evidence (en, 6ddec96f85b8): When using AI in research, whether as a supporting investigative tool or a technology with which human subjects directly interact, researchers must clearly explain in consent forms how AI will be used, what kinds of data it will access, and explicitly outline any associated risks and limitations.
16+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-20T01:17:00.000Z
817 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
918 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
19+procurement: Rutgers OIT guidance says anyone considering purchase of an AI application for use at Rutgers must follow the same security processes and risk assessments as other software purchases, as well as Rutgers digital-accessibility standards.
20+Evidence (en, 6e9ca859b81c): If you are considering the purchase of an AI application for use at Rutgers, you must follow the same security processes and risk assessments as for other software purchases, as well as standards for digital accessibility.
21+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-20T01:08:00.000Z
1022 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1123 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
24+ai_tool_treatment: Rutgers IT's central AI page lists Microsoft Copilot Chat, NotebookLM, and Google Gemini as centrally funded AI tools available to Rutgers students, faculty, and staff at no additional cost, while Microsoft 365 Copilot, ChatGPT Edu, and Google AI Pro are listed as subscription-required tools.
25+Evidence (en, 150ff188c140): AI tools (no additional cost): Microsoft Copilot Chat; NotebookLM; Google Gemini. AI tools (subscription required): Microsoft 365 Copilot (apps); ChatGPT Edu; Google AI Pro.
26+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-20T01:09:00.000Z
1227 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1328 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
29+ai_tool_treatment: Rutgers OIT guidance says only Rutgers-approved AI tools should be used at the university to protect university data and ensure appropriate use; Rutgers-approved versions include security and privacy safeguards and do not use Rutgers data to train underlying models.
30+Evidence (en, 6e9ca859b81c): The tools licensed by Rutgers include security and privacy safeguards for appropriate use at the university. By using the Rutgers-approved versions of these tools, your data will not be used to train the models underlying the tools. To protect university data and ensure appropriate use, only Rutgers-approved AI tools should be used at the university.
31+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-20T01:08:00.000Z
1432 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1533 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
34+privacy: Rutgers OIT guidance says confidential information, protected health information, and other proprietary Rutgers information may not be appropriate for use in AI applications and systems, and directs users to Rutgers data-classification and IT policies.
35+Evidence (en, 6e9ca859b81c): Confidential information, Protected Health Information (PHI), and other proprietary Rutgers information may not be appropriate for use in AI applications and systems. For additional guidance, please consult this data classification chart for AI tools, as well as the Information Classification Policy 70.1.2 and other Information Technology policies.
36+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-20T01:08:00.000Z
1637 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1738 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
39+teaching: Rutgers teaching guidance says GenAI detectors should be treated with caution and cites research indicating they cannot currently be recommended for determining academic-integrity violations because of accuracy limits and false-accusation risk.
40+Evidence (en, 439718698e45): The varying performances of GenAI tools and detectors indicate they cannot currently be recommended for determining academic integrity violations due to accuracy limitations and the potential for false accusation which undermines inclusive and fair assessment practices.
41+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-20T01:10:00.000Z
1842 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1943 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
44+teaching: Rutgers teaching guidance recommends clear and transparent course policies around generative AI, class discussion of those policies and rationales, and, when GenAI is permissible, student disclosure and reflection on use plus submission of prompts and outputs.
45+Evidence (en, 439718698e45): Have clear and transparent policies around generative artificial intelligence and discuss them with each class as well as the rationales behind them. If utilizing GenAI is permissible in a course, in addition to having students disclose usage, have students reflect on how they used it and how it impacted their learning. In addition, have students turn in any prompts and outputs.
46+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-20T01:10:00.000Z
2047 ## Source attribution added
2148 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
49+Source https://it.rutgers.edu/ai/ snapshot 150ff188c140ae62c476995f402a10b4776710282d6f8357ee85d189e0e11c68
50+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-20T01:09:00.000Z
2251 ## Source attribution added
2352 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
53+Source https://it.rutgers.edu/ai/guidance-on-the-use-of-ai-at-rutgers/ snapshot 6e9ca859b81c5dbd8b76c39718b26f1a473f11c82895290959117c4d8778128d
54+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-20T01:08:00.000Z
2455 ## Source attribution added
2556 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
57+Source https://policies.rutgers.edu/B.aspx?BookId=11914&PageId=459231&Search=academic%20integrity snapshot 30b7a29045578eae733c945e9a4d01f6363e14d2f2c966a8493adf570fb0bb54
58+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-20T01:15:00.000Z
2659 ## Source attribution added
2760 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
61+Source https://research.rutgers.edu/faculty-staff/compliance/human-research-protection/hrpp-guidance-topics snapshot 6ddec96f85b81cf6baee9d1dc1e436bfb84b4d74a17fa57ff7b30e4f94101b23
62+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-20T01:17:00.000Z
2863 ## Source attribution added
2964 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
65+Source https://teaching.rutgers.edu/genai/ snapshot 439718698e453ba894d43f1b758d14c87fe6e888a482a254325b0cbd81179219
66+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-20T01:10:00.000Z
Hoe deze diff te lezen
Trackerreleasedata, geen direct bewijs van het tijdstip van universitair publiceren.
Zojuist geëxtraheerde beweringen zijn toevoegingen aan de tracker en zijn niet per se recent door de universiteit gepubliceerd. Wijzigingen in bron-snapshots betekenen dat dezelfde URL een andere hash opleverde; dit kan gaan om beleidstekst, lay-out, navigatie of metadata.
Rand
Alleen trackermetadata
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.