Posthistorikk
Oppdateringer til denne nettsidens gjennomgåtte oppføring, ikke en bekreftelse på at universitetet har endret sin policy.
Samsvarende revisjoner: 5
Sideoppdatering
Revisjon: v6-reading-rankings-ten-20261027Sammenlignbar gammel og ny tekst er ikke tilgjengelig.
Shared V6 reading layout and evidence presentation updated. University policy Claims, original evidence, held decisions and snapshot approvals remain unchanged; the institution audit remains PARTIAL.
Vedlikehold av poster
Revisjon: qs35-40-v6-r4-meta-20261022Sammenlignbar gammel og ny tekst er ikke tilgjengelig.
Involverte oppføringer: 33 (16 korrigert / justert · 16 lagt til · 1 på vent)
Revisjon: qs35-40-v6-r3-20261022Involverte oppføringer: 33 (16 korrigert / justert · 16 lagt til · 1 på vent)
Behandling av AI-verktøy · Kildestatus · 5 flere temaer
SNU's AI Guidelines require transparent disclosure of AI use, fact and source verification, copyright/privacy/information security compliance, bias correction, and awareness of accountability.
SNU AI Guidelines Chapter 2 §1 sets general ethical principles: members should share and acknowledge AI use to the extent possible (§1(1)), should verify facts and sources (§1(2)), must comply with copyright, privacy, and information security laws and University rules and ensure inputs do not include personal or rights-infringing content (§1(3)), should make diligent efforts to mitigate bias (§1(4)), and must recognize full personal responsibility for submitted AI-assisted outputs (§1(6)).
SNU's AI Guidelines require compliance with core ethical standards (transparency, accuracy, privacy, information security, accountability) throughout the entire AI use process, with domain-specific considerations for education, research, and administration.
SNU's AI Guidelines (Chapter 2) set forth core ethical standards—transparency, fact and source verification, copyright/privacy/information security compliance, bias mitigation, and personal accountability—along with domain-specific ethical guidelines for teaching and learning, research and development, and administration.
SNU Library provides an AI ethics checklist requiring researchers to cite AI sources, avoid rights infringement, not input sensitive information, cross-verify AI outputs, and use AI only as a supplementary tool.
SNU Central Library provides an advisory AI research ethics self-checklist asking researchers whether they clearly cited generative AI outputs, avoided using text/audio/images that infringe others' rights, refrained from entering sensitive or personal information, cross-checked AI outputs for errors or bias, and used AI as a supplementary research tool.
SNU Library warns that not citing generative AI use in papers risks plagiarism charges; researchers must cite AI use according to journal-specific styles (MLA, APA, Chicago).
SNU Central Library guidance warns that failing to cite generative AI use when writing papers risks being regarded as plagiarism, and advises researchers to cite generative AI appropriately according to each target journal's citation style (introducing MLA, APA, and Chicago examples).
Under SNU AI Guidelines Chapter 2 §2(3), instructors should understand the limitations and imperfections of AI detection tools (AI 탐지 도구의 불완전성을 이해하고) and, except where AI use is explicitly permitted under course policies, take care to prevent students from gaining unfair advantages in assignments or examinations through improper use of AI (the Guidelines do not state a formal sole-evidence prohibition).
Under SNU AI Guidelines Chapter 2 §2(7), students should recognize that using AI in ways prohibited by the instructor may be deemed a violation of academic ethics (학습 윤리 위반으로 인정되어) and may result in academic or disciplinary disadvantages (불이익을 받을 수 있음); this provision uses conditional MAY modality and does not establish an automatic finding or automatic sanction.
SNU requires instructors to communicate AI tool usage policies (permitted/prohibited scope and reporting methods) through syllabi, and students must comply.
Under SNU AI Guidelines Chapter 2 §2(1)–(2) and §2(5), instructors should determine the scope of permitted and prohibited AI use and reporting requirements according to course nature and should clearly state and communicate their policies in course syllabi, whereas students must review and comply with the instructor's syllabus policies and must report their AI use in the prescribed manner when required.
Under SNU AI Guidelines Chapter 2 §2(1), respecting instructors' autonomy and discretion, each instructor should determine, in accordance with the nature of the course, the scope of permitted and prohibited AI use and the reporting requirements for such use; AI tools should support effective learning and must not hinder learners' critical and creative thinking.
Under SNU AI Guidelines Chapter 2 §2(2), instructors should clearly state their policies regarding AI use in course syllabi or equivalent materials and communicate these policies sufficiently to enrolled students.
Under SNU AI Guidelines Chapter 2 §2(4), instructors should avoid relying exclusively on AI when evaluating student performance (Korean: 교수자는 학생 평가를 함에 있어 AI에 전적으로 의존하는 것을 지양한다; this is a normative recommendation SHOULD / 지양한다, not an absolute ban).
Under SNU AI Guidelines Chapter 2 §2(6), students may use AI tools within the scope permitted by the instructor's policy and should bear final responsibility for such use.
Under SNU AI Guidelines Chapter 2 §2(5), students must review and comply with the instructor's course policies as stated in the syllabus or related materials (수업 정책을 확인하고 이를 준수하여야 하며) and must report their use of AI tools in the prescribed manner when required (정해진 방식에 따라 보고해야 한다).
Under SNU AI Guidelines Chapter 2 §2(9), the University should institutionally support the development of alternative teaching and assessment methods that do not rely on AI detection tools (Korean: 제도적으로 지원한다; this is an institutional support recommendation SHOULD, not a mandatory individual student entitlement).
SNU Library states that most e-resource subscription agreements only permit viewing, downloading, and printing; using resources for AI training/analysis or uploading to third-party AI services requires separate authorization.
SNU Central Library states that most electronic resource subscription agreements permit only viewing, downloading, and printing, while input for AI training/analysis or uploading to third-party services is not permitted without separate authorization, and notes that publisher license restrictions may separately prohibit such use even where copyright fair use might otherwise be recognized.
Under SNU AI Guidelines Chapter 2 §3(4), researchers must take care to prevent the leakage of sensitive information directly related to research (including R&D plans, research data, project-related information, and personal data of research personnel), should not unnecessarily enter into or share research data or confidential information with AI tools (불필요하게 입력하거나 공유하지 않으며), and must strictly observe research security requirements and relevant laws and regulations.
SNU's AI Guidelines for research require cross-verification of AI outputs for errors/bias, protection of research data and confidential information, and documentation of AI use for research reproducibility.
Under SNU AI Guidelines Chapter 2 §3(2), §3(4), and §3(5), researchers must review AI outputs and cross-validate them against literature, experiments, and expert judgment; must take care to prevent leakage of sensitive research information, should not unnecessarily enter or share research data or confidential information with AI tools, and must strictly observe research security laws; and should record and preserve the AI usage process (prompts, versions, model names, scope) to the extent possible for reproducibility.
SNU Library guidance states that researchers should use AI to improve research efficiency while maintaining research ethics and practicing responsible AI use.
SNU Central Library AI Literacy guidance states that AI can reduce working time and improve research productivity from topic discovery to editing and summarization, while advising researchers to uphold research ethics and responsible AI use.
SNU Library cites COPE's position that AI tools cannot be listed as authors because they cannot take responsibility for research results and lack legal personality.
SNU Central Library guidance on AI and research/publishing ethics cites COPE's position that AI tools cannot meet authorship requirements because they cannot take responsibility for submitted research results and lack legal personality to manage conflicts of interest, copyright, or license agreements.
SNU Library cites COPE requiring authors to clearly disclose in their methods section which AI tools were used and how, covering manuscript writing, image creation, and data analysis.
SNU Central Library guidance cites COPE's position that authors who use AI tools in manuscript writing, image or graphic production, or data collection and analysis must clearly disclose in the materials and methods (or equivalent) section which AI tool was used and how.
SNU Library advises researchers to check target journal editorial policies from the planning stage, as policies vary on whether LLMs can be listed as authors and whether AI-generated text is permitted.
SNU Central Library guidance (and AI Guidelines Chapter 2 §3(7)) states that researchers must check the editorial policies of target journals and publishers from the research planning stage, as publishers vary on disallowing LLM authorship, restricting AI-generated text, or permitting AI only as a supplementary tool.
Under SNU AI Guidelines Chapter 2 §3(6), AI is a research support tool and cannot replace a researcher's scholarly judgment or critical thinking; core research design and interpretation must be led by human researchers.
Under SNU AI Guidelines Chapter 2 §3(3) Footnote 1, in research and development, where AI is used solely for correcting foreign-language expressions or grammatical review—analogous to traditional language editing services—such use does not in itself constitute research misconduct such as plagiarism merely because AI use is not explicitly disclosed, provided that it does not violate the policies of research funding agencies, affiliated institutions, academic societies, or scholarly journals (this applies to research under Section 3 and is not a coursework exception).
ChatGPT Edu is listed for Seoul National University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.
Seoul National University provides ChatGPT Edu (including Codex software development support) for a 15-month operational period (June 2026 – August 2027) to currently enrolled students and employed faculty and researchers via administrator batch registration (administrative staff apply individually; affiliated school teachers receive ChatGPT Plus by application; members on academic or employment leave (휴학·휴직) are excluded). The SNU press release states the service is provided free of charge to students and excludes user input/output data from model training; accounts inactive for 3 or more months are subject to ID recall.
SNU's AI Guidelines do not uniformly restrict or prohibit AI use; they establish standards to support rational judgment and ethical, creative use based on autonomy and trust.
SNU's AI Guidelines present voluntary principles rather than uniform prohibitions or restrictions on AI use, supporting context-specific judgment, creative approaches, and clear communication grounded in academic autonomy, trust, and social responsibility.
SNU's AI Guidelines establish basic principles requiring members to understand AI tool purposes and characteristics, apply critical thinking, and balance creativity with social responsibility.
SNU's AI Guidelines (Chapter 1) establish usage principles encouraging members to clarify their purposes before using AI, understand each AI technology's performance and limitations, maintain critical thinking without overreliance, and harmonize creative scholarly activity with social responsibility.
Under SNU IT Planning Division Notice 3923, ChatGPT Edu users are instructed to comply with the SNU AI Guidelines, accounts inactive for 3 or more months are recalled (with reuse requests available if needed), and accounts are suspended upon academic or employment leave, or retirement.
Under SNU IT Planning Division Notice 3923 (2026-06-04), the SNU ChatGPT Edu service is operated from June 2026 to August 2027 (15 months) for currently enrolled students and employed faculty and researchers via administrator batch registration (administrative staff apply individually; affiliated school teachers receive ChatGPT Plus by individual application; members on academic or employment leave (휴학·휴직) are excluded).
Under SNU IT Planning Division Notice 3923 and the June 2, 2026 SNU press release, OpenAI Codex is provided as a key feature alongside ChatGPT Edu to support software development tasks including code writing, code review, and testing; the notice requires compliance with the SNU AI Guidelines and does not establish a product-specific coursework or examination restriction (course instructor policy governs under §2(1) and §2(5)).
SNU Library warns that uploading subscribed e-resources to ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or similar AI services, or performing bulk downloads, may exceed publisher license terms and could result in access being blocked for the entire university.
SNU Central Library warns that uploading subscribed electronic resources to generative AI services (such as ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini), or performing bulk downloads, calls, or full-text inputs, may exceed publisher license terms and could result in access suspension or subscription fee increases for the entire university.
SNU Central Library notice (2026-04-20) states that using DOIs or other identifiers to automatically and repeatedly collect subscribed electronic resources exceeds individual viewing and downloading license permissions and constitutes an explicitly prohibited act (including the use of robots, crawlers, and automated tools) under publisher terms of use.
SNU Central Library notice (2026-04-20) states that repeated violations of publisher license agreements may lead publishers to suspend access for the entire university or raise subscription fees, and that repeated fair-use/license violations may be sanctioned under Article 24 (Copyright Compliance) of the SNU Central Library Regulations Enforcement Rules.
SNU hosts official Korean and English PDF versions of the SNU AI Guidelines on its downloads page.
SNU lists Korean and English PDF editions of the enacted SNU AI Guidelines (enacted Jan. 1, 2026) on its central downloads page (published March 18, 2026, where direct attachment links currently return HTTP 404) and serves the working official Korean and English PDF binaries through the Office of Research Affairs notice board (snurnd.snu.ac.kr, published Feb. 19, 2026).
Beholdt historisk tekst; dette betyr ikke at universitetet opphevet en regel.
SNU Library notes that many research institutions lack clear AI policies, and researchers operate in uncertainty or within extremely limited scope.
Holdt tilbake / fjernet fra gjeldende konklusjonerInvolverte oppføringer: 4
Revisjon: public-release-20260715-005Involverte oppføringer: 4
Behandling av AI-verktøy
Sammenlignbar gammel og ny tekst er ikke tilgjengelig.
ChatGPT Edu is listed for Seoul National University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.
Sammenlignbar gammel og ny tekst er ikke tilgjengelig.
마인드로직 인포미 is listed for Seoul National University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.
Sammenlignbar gammel og ny tekst er ikke tilgjengelig.
네이버 클로버 스튜디오 is listed for Seoul National University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.
Sammenlignbar gammel og ny tekst er ikke tilgjengelig.
스누AIChat is listed for Seoul National University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: self hosted system.
Historisk dokumentasjon eller klassifisering er ufullstendig; se revisjonshistorikken.
Åpne revisjonshistorikkInvolverte oppføringer: 3 (3 lagt til)
Revisjon: public-release-20260710-001Involverte oppføringer: 3 (3 lagt til)
Behandling av AI-verktøy
마인드로직 인포미 is listed for Seoul National University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.
네이버 클로버 스튜디오 is listed for Seoul National University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.
스누AIChat is listed for Seoul National University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: self hosted system.
