Change log

Stanford University

Release-to-release tracker diff with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

Stanford University currently has 9 source-backed claim records and 13 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 6, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.

Diff categories

Semantic classification for this release diff.

Policy text0Newly extracted0Evidence0Source snapshots0Source text0Source added0Source removed0

Release diff

Unified tracker diff generated from the previous and current public release snapshots.

No tracker claim/evidence/source changes are recorded for this university in the latest public release.

Claim changes

9 claim records

academic_integrity

Stanford's BCA issued guidance on generative AI use, and the Office of Community Standards recommends that instructors give advance notice to students when using AI detection software.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

Stanford's Bechtel Center for Advising (BCA) provides guidance on generative AI in the context of the Honor Code, noting that acceptable AI use depends on individual instructor and course policies.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesen

teaching

For Stanford Graduate School of Business (GSB) MBA and MSx courses, instructors may not ban student use of AI tools for take-home coursework, including assignments and exams. Instructors may choose whether to allow AI for in-class work. For PhD and undergraduate courses, GSB follows the university-wide Generative AI Policy Guidance from the Office of Community Standards.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence1Languagesen

teaching

Stanford School of Medicine MD and MSPA programs have a formal AI policy: students may use AI for learning, clarification, and grammar/style editing unless contrary to assignment instructions. AI use for closed-book exams or assignments where internet is restricted is prohibited unless explicitly authorized by faculty. Students are responsible for all AI-generated content they submit, must disclose and cite substantial AI contributions, and violations may result in disciplinary action.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence1Languagesen

privacy

Stanford School of Medicine MD and MSPA programs strictly prohibit entering confidential research data, patient data, or protected health information (PHI) into public AI platforms. Use of patient-identifying information or PHI in public AI tools is strictly forbidden. Students must use Stanford-approved AI platforms (e.g., Stanford Healthcare Secure GPT, Stanford AI Playground) when handling sensitive data.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence1Languagesen

teaching

Stanford Law School instructors set their own AI policies; in the absence of a course-specific policy, students may use generative AI to support learning and develop or refine their own ideas, but may not use AI to generate content presented as their own work. Using AI during an exam or to draft/revise submitted work is not permitted unless disclosed in advance and explicitly authorized in writing by the instructor. Unauthorized use may result in an F grade and/or referral to Stanford's Office of Community Standards.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence1Languagesen

teaching

Stanford's Program in Writing and Rhetoric (PWR) prohibits students from using generative AI or LLMs to compose drafts or revisions for any major assignment in PWR courses, including composing or revising portions of essays or scripts, including paraphrases of LLM-generated writing. Students may not rely on generative AI summaries of sources. Violation of PWR's AI policy is treated as an Honor Code violation and results in referral to the Office of Community Standards.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence1Languagesen

other

Stanford University IT (UIT) advises users to avoid inputting Moderate or High Risk Data into third-party AI platforms or tools not covered by a Stanford Business Associates Agreement, whether using a personal or Stanford account. Users should opt out of sharing chat data with third-party AI providers when possible.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesen

other

Stanford University Communications (UComm) has issued AI guidelines for marketing and communications staff requiring: human oversight of all AI-generated content (non-delegable personal responsibility), adherence to university policies, prohibition on inputting confidential or legally privileged information into generative AI tools, prohibition on using AI to promote for-profit organizations or engage in political advocacy, and prohibition on using high-risk data in prompts. Stanford AI Playground is recommended as the primary platform. These guidelines apply to all regular staff, interns, casual employees, and consultants in marketing and communications functions.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesen

Source snapshots

13 source attributions

AI Meets Education at Stanford (AIMES)

official_guidance Tracker checked at May 6, 2026, 1:07 AM

Snapshot hash
57e3fd0e204837f5675b4d7574bc0e80c8a3ea77ed35f25d633d980877f8d2f9

AI Playground Quick Start Guide - University IT

official_guidance Tracker checked at May 6, 2026, 1:07 AM

Snapshot hash
56d7c59c0b23d411ad4aa7ec660eadd239c0a02c6f4bbf186cd75e79054971e6

University IT AI Hub

official_guidance Tracker checked at May 6, 2026, 1:07 AM

Snapshot hash
4a81586fe631363a2723400e8cb208bdae6a10b4967630ca57c30a7c94b76005